Argumentation and education: notes for a debate / Argumentación y educación: apuntes para un debate

References / Referencias

• Andriessen, J., Baker, M. J., & Suthers, D. (2003). Argumentation, computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognitions. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 1–25). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Barlett, F. (1958). Thinking. An experimental and social study. Londres: Allen and Unwin. [Spanish trans. by Cristina Simón Cordero Pensamiento: un estudio experimental y social. Madrid: Síntesis, 1988].
   Google Scholar
• Bell, P., & Linn, M. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 797–817. doi:10.1080/095006900412284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.) (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Company, Inc
   Google Scholar
• Cano, M., & Castelló, M. (2011). Polifonia e dialogismo nas práticas argumentativas dos estudantes universitários em resposta a diferentes demandas. In S. Leitão, & M. C. Damianovic (Eds.), Argumentação na escola: O conhecimento em construção. Campinas, São Paulo: Pontes editores.
   Google Scholar
• Cano, M., & Castelló, M. (2016). Argumentar para aprender: Evolución del discurso argumentativo en función de la demanda de aprendizaje. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 39, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Chater, N., & Oaksford, M. (2012). Normative systems: Logic, probability, and rational choice. In K. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning. Oxford: Oxfrord University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0002
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Anderson, R. A. (1998). The structure of discussions intended to promote reasoning. The Teachers College Record, 100, 315–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (2001). Models of data: A theory of how people evaluate data. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 323–393. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI1903_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. J. (1981). Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 317–333. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00009092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., & Garcia-Mila, M. (2015). Epistemic practices and thinking in science. Fostering teachers’ development in scientific argumentation. In R. Wegerif, L. Li, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Research on teaching Thinking. New York: Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.routledge.com/books/search/author/rupert_wegerif/
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J.-Y. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in science education: A journal content analysis from 1998-2014. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1). doi:10.1186/s40594-015-0020-1
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., Charnerss, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (2006). Recommendation of the European parliament and of the council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union, 30–12–2006, L 394/10–L 394/18. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32006H0962
   Google Scholar
• Felton, M., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S. (2009). Effective argumentation: The impact of discourse goals on learning outcomes in the science classroom. Informal Logic, 29, 417–446.
   Google Scholar
• Felton, M., Garcia-Mila, M., Villarroel, C., & Gilabert, S. (2015). Arguing collaboratively: Argumentative discourse types and their potential for knowledge building. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 372–386. doi:10.1111/bjep.12078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton, M., & Kuhn, D. (2001). The development of argumentive discourse skills. Discourse Processes, 32, 135–153. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2001.9651595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabucio, F. (2002). Pensamiento, argumentación y significado. Estudios de Psicología, 23, 359–372. doi:10.1174/021093902762224434
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Mila, M., Pérez Echeverría, M. P., Postigo, Y., Martí, E., Villarroel, C., & Gabucio, F. (2016). Centrales nucleares ¿Sio No? ¡Gracias¡ El uso argumentativo de tablas y gráficas. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 39, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., & Pachur, T. (Eds.). (2011). Heuristics: The foundations of adaptive behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• González-Lamas, J., Cuevas, I., & Mateos, M. (2016). Argumentar a partir de fuentes: Diseño y evaluación de un programa para mejorar la argumentación escrita y su impacto en función de las creencias acerca de la escritura académica que mantienen los estudiantes. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 39, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Hornikx, J., & Hahn, U. (2012). Reasoning and argumentation: Towards an integrated psychology of argumentation. Thinking & Reasoning, 18, 225–243. doi:10.1080/13546783.2012.674715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Bugallo-Rodriguez, A., & Duschl, R. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84, 757–792. doi:10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Pereiro-Muñoz, C. (2002). Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1171–1190. doi:10.1080/09500690210134857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R., & Blair, J. A. (1977). Logical and self-defense (3rd ed.). 1993. Toronto: McGraw Hill Ryerson.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. H. (2000). Manifest rationality. A pragmatic theory of argument. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. H., & Blair, A. (1994). Logical self-defense. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Towards a cognitive science on language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G., Druker, S., & Chen, C. (1998). Students’ reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 849–871. doi:10.1080/0950069980200707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 212–218. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 155–179. doi:10.17763/haer.62.2.9r424r0113t670l1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28, 16–46. doi:10.3102/0013189X028002016
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking. Psychological Science, 22, 545–552. doi:10.1177/0956797611402512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., & Khait, K. (2016). Dialogic argumentation as a bridge to argumentive thinking and writing. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 39, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2007). Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument. Thinking & Reasoning, 13, 90–104. doi:10.1080/13546780600625447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitão, S. (2001). Analyzing changes in view during argumentation: A quest for method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research/ SOZIALFORSCHUNG, 2(3). Art.12. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/
   Google Scholar
• Malpique, A., & Veiga-Simão, A. M. (2016). Argumentative writing by junior high-school students: Discourse knowledge and writing performance. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 39, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier, H. (2013). The function of reasoning: Argumentative and pragmatic alternatives. Thinking & Reasoning, 19, 488–494. doi:10.1080/13546783.2013.819036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 57–74. doi:10.1017/S0140525X10000968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M., & Sinatra, G. M. (2003). Argument and conceptual engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 384–395. doi:10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00038-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2007). Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994–1020. doi:10.1002/tea.20035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? Science Education, 95, 627–638. doi:10.1002/sce.20438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1931–35). Collected papers of charles sanders peirce. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. N., Faraday, M., & Bushey, B. (1991). Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 83–105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pozo, J. I. (2014). Psicología del aprendizaje humano. Adquisición de conocimiento y cambio personal. Madrid: Morata.
   Google Scholar
• Rapanta, C., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S. (2013). What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education. Review of Educational Research, 83, 483–520. doi:10.3102/0034654313487606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapanta, C., & Walton, D. (2016). Influencia de la formación académica, la temática, el género y la cultura sobre la producción de paralogismos por estudiantes universitarios. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 39, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Fowler, S. R. (2006). A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation. Science Education, 90, 986–1004. doi:10.1002/sce.20165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, D. (2000). Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In D. Sperber (Ed.), Metarepresentations: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 117–37). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, N. L., & Miller, C. A. (1993). The development of memory and reasoning skill in argumentative contexts: Evaluating, explaining, and generating evidence. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1958/2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trapp, R., Yingling, J., & Wanner, J. (1987). Measuring argumentative competence. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Argumentation: Across the lines of discipline (pp. 253–261). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris. doi:10.1515/9783110867718.253
   Google Scholar
• Uhn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2012). Rational argument. In K. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0015
   Google Scholar
• van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2002). Argumentation. Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 101–131. doi:10.1002/tea.20213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. N. (1987). Informal fallacies. Towards a theory of argument criticisms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. N. (1989). Informal Logic: A handbook for critical argumentation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. N. (1996). Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. N. (2000). Case study of the use of a circumstantial ad hominem in political argumentation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 33, 101–115. doi:10.1353/par.2000.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2010). What counts as evidence of educational achievement? The role of constructs in the pursuit of equity in assessment. Review of Research in Education, 34, 254–284. doi:10.3102/0091732X09351544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35–62. doi:10.1002/tea.10008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar