2,302
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

School-based curriculum development in Singapore: a case study of a primary school

, &
Pages 518-532 | Received 20 Jun 2015, Accepted 09 Sep 2018, Published online: 29 Oct 2018

References

  • Beech, H., & Abdoolcarim, Z. (2015). Exclusive: Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong speaks candidly with TIME. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Singapore. Retrieved from: https://www.mfa.gov.sg/content/mfa/overseasmission/geneva/press_statements_speeches/2015/201507/press_20150723.html.
  • Bezzina, M. (1991). Teachers’ perceptions of their participation in school based curriculum development: A case study. Curriculum Perspectives, 11, 39‒47.
  • Biccum, A.R. (2015). The politics of education for globalization: Managed activism in a time of crisis. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 69(3), 321–338.
  • Bolstad, R. (2004). School-based curriculum development: Principles, processes, and practices. Retrieved February 23, 2015, from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/content/download/1096/7496/file/SBDCbackgroundpaper.doc
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  • Chang, C.Y., & Hwang, J.J. (2010). School-based curriculum development in Taiwan. In E.H.F. Law & N. Niveen (Eds.), Schools as curriculum agencies: Asian and European perspectives on school-based curriculum development (pp. 151‒164). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Chua, B.H. (1997). Communitarian ideology and democracy in Singapore. London: Routledge.
  • Delpish, A., Holmes, A., Knight-McKenna, M., Mihans, R., Darby, A., King, K., & Felten, P. (2010). Equalizing voices: Student-faculty partnership in course design. In C. Werder & M.M. Otis (Eds.), Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning (pp. 96–114). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Elliot, J. (1997). School-based curriculum development and action research in the United Kingdom. In S. Hollingsworth (Ed.), International action research: A casebook for educational reform (pp. 17‒28). London: Falmer Press.
  • Fullan, M.G. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depth of educational reform. London: Falmer Press.
  • Fullan, M.G. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
  • Fullan, M.G. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Fullan, M.G. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University.
  • Goh, J.W.P. (2006). “To niche or not niche?” – A caveat on the development of niche areas in Singapore schools. Policy in Education, 34(3), 51–62.
  • Gopinathan, S. (2007). Globalisation, the Singapore developmental state and education policy: A thesis revisited. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 5(1), 53–70.
  • Gopinathan, S., & Deng, Z. (2006). Fostering school-based curriculum development in the context of new educational initiatives in Singapore planning and changing. Educational Leadership and Policy Journal, 37, 93–110.
  • Gorodnichenko, Y., Svejnar, J., & Terrell, K. (2008). Globalization and innovation in emerging markets. Retrieved February 9, 2015, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w14481.pdf.
  • Hairon, S. (2006). Action research in Singapore education –constraints and sustainability. Educational Action Research, 14(4), 513–23.
  • Hairon, S., & Dimmock, D. (2012). Singapore schools and professional learning communities: Teacher professional development and school leadership in an Asian hierarchical system. Educational Review, 64(4), 405‒424.
  • Hairon, S., & Goh, J.W.P. (2015). Pursuing the elusive constructof distributed leadership: Is the search over?. EducationalManagement, Administration and Leadership, 43(5), 693‒718.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Jeffrey, B., & Troman, G. (2004). Time for ethnography. British Educational Research Journal, 30, 535–548.
  • Jeong, Y.K. (2010). The practice of school-based curriculum development in Korea. In E.H.F. Law & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Schools as curriculum agencies: Asian and European perspectives on school-based curriculum development (pp. 113‒130). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Keiny, S. (2006). School-based curriculum development as a process of teachers’ professional development. Educational Action Research, 1, 65‒93.
  • Kennedy, K.J., & Lee, J.C. (2008). The changing role of schools in Asian societies: Schools for the knowledge society. New York: Routledge.
  • Kuh, G. (2008). High-impact educational practices. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  • Leong, K.L., Sim, J.B.Y., & Chua, S.H. (2011). School-based curriculum development in Singapore: Bottom-up perspectives of a top-down policy. Curriculum Perspectives, 31, 51‒61.
  • Liew, W.C. (2009). More funds for autonomous schools. Retrieved January 3, 2015, from http://news.asiaone.com/News/Education/Story/A1Story20090526-143945.html
  • Markee, N. (1997). Managing curricular innovation. USA: Cambridge University press.
  • Marsh, C., Day, C., Hannay, L., & McCutcheon, G. (1990). Reconceptualizing school-based curriculum development. London: Falmer Press.
  • Marsh, C.J. (1992). Key concepts for understanding curriculum. London: Palmer Press.
  • Marsh, C.J. (1997). Planning, management & ideology: Key concepts for understanding curriculum. London: Falmer.
  • Marsh, C.J. (2009). How school-based curriculum development (SBCD) can facilitate curriculum differentiation. Proceedings of International Conference on Primary Education in Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 25–27 November 2009. Retrieved from http:www.ied.edu.hk/primaryed/eproceedings/fullpaer/RN334.pdf.
  • Mauzy, D.K., & Milne, R.S. (2002). Singapore politics under the people’s action party. London: Routledge.
  • Merriam, S.B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Ministry of Education (MOE) (2005). Speech by Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Minister for Education, at the MOE Work Plan Seminar 2004, Ngee Ann Polytechnic Convention Centre, Thursday 22 September, 10:00 a.m. Retrieved September 30, 2006, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/2005/sp20050922.htm
  • Ministry of Education (MOE) (2014). Nurturing students. Retrieved August 5, 2014, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/nurturing-students.
  • Morris, P., Cogan, J.J., & Liu, M.H. (2002). A comparative overview: Civic education across the six societies. In J.J. Cogan, P. Morris, & M. Print (Eds.), Civic education in the Asia-Pacific region: Case studies across six societies (pp. 167‒190). New York: Routledge.
  • Nowell, L.S., Norris, J.M., White, D.E., & Moules, N.J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13.
  • Parkay, F.W., Anctil, E.J., & Hass, G. (2006). Curriculum planning: A contemporary approach. Pearson: Boston.
  • Reid, W. (1987). Where is the habit of deliberation? In N. Sabar, J. Rudduck, & W. Reid (Eds.), Partnership and autonomy in school-based curriculum development (pp. 110‒114). Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield, Division of Education.
  • Rudduck, J. (2007). Student voice, student engagement and school reform. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 587‒610). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Sinagatullin, I.M. (2006). The impact of globalization on education: The impact of globalization on education. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  • Skilbeck, M. (1984). School-based curriculum development. London: Harper and Row.
  • Skilbeck, M. (1990). Curriculum reform: An overview of trends. Washington, DC: OECD.
  • Smith, W.E. (1993). Teachers’ perceptions of role change through shared decision making: A two year case study. Retrieved January 4, 2015, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED360299.pdf
  • Tan, K. P. (2012). The ideology of pragmatism: neo-liberal globalisation and political authoritarianism in singapore. 42(1), 67-92.
  • Tan, K. P. (2017, May 22). Resisting authoritarian populism: Lessons from and for Singapore. The Straits Times. Retrieved from: http://www.todayonline.com/commentary/resisting-authoritarianpopulism-lessons-and-singapore.
  • Teo, N., & Osbourne, M. (2010). An emergent culture of school-based curriculum development in Singapore. In E.H.F. Law & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Schools as curriculum agencies: Asian and European perspectives on school-based curriculum development (pp. 131‒149). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • The Association of Academics of Sciences in Asia (AASA). (2011). Towards a sustainable Asia: The cultural perspective. Korea: Springer.
  • Wang, L.Y., & Neo, W.L. (2012). Through the lens of schools: An examination of school-based curriculum innovation (SCI) in technology-driven schools in Singapore. Proceedings of the The Asian Conference on Education 2012: Learning and Teaching Through Transformative Spaces, October 24–28, Osaka, Japan.
  • White, R.V. (1992). Innovation in second language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 244‒259.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.