Exploring behavioural differences between certificate achievers and explorers in MOOCs

References

• Aldowah, H., Al-Samarraie, H., Alzahrani, A.I., & Alalwan, N. (2020). Factors affecting student dropout in MOOCs: A cause and effect decision-making model. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32, 429–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Shabandar, R., Hussain, A., Laws, A., Keight, R., Lunn, J., & Radi, N. (2017, May). Machine learning approaches to predict learning outcomes in Massive open online courses. In Proceedings of 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (pp. 713–720). Anchorage, AK, USA. doi: 10.1109/ijcnn.2017.7965922
   Google Scholar
• Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J.M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2014). (Dis)organization and success in an economics MOOC. American Economic Review, 104(5), 446–460. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.5.514 5 104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B.S. (1974). An introduction to mastery learning theory. In J.H. Block (Ed.), Schools, society and mastery learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 3-14
   Google Scholar
• Coetzee, D., Fox, A., Hearst, M.A., & Hartmann, B. (2014). Should your MOOC forum use a reputation system? In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 1176–1187). Baltimore, Maryland, USA. doi: 10.1145/2531602.2531657
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D., Chen, G., Hauff, C., & Houben, G.J. (2016). Gauging MOOC learners’ adherence to the designed learning path. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 54–61). Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. Retrieved January 2, 2020, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED592664.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis, S.I., Liparas, D., & Tsolaki, M.N. (2018). Random forest feature selection, fusion and ensemble strategy: Combining multiple morphological MRI measures to discriminate among healhy elderly, MCI, cMCI and alzheimer’s disease patients: From the alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI) database. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 302, 14–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do, C.B., Chen, Z., Brandman, R., & Koller, D. (2013). Self-driven mastery in massive open online courses. MOOCs FORUM, 1, 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K., Aggarwal, H., Williams, T.V., Fan, Y., & Bermel, P. (2018). Comparison of live, late and archived mode learner behavior in an advanced engineering MOOC. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–7). San Jose, CA, USA. doi: 10.1109/fie.2018.8658884
   Google Scholar
• Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M.L., & García-Peñalvo, F.J. (2015). Methodological approach and technological framework to break the current limitations of MOOC model. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 21(5), 712–734. Retrieved January 2, 2020, from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6408/8aebbff1b8aa366a5704323fe9c78b921f51.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formanek, M., Wenger, M.C., Buxner, S.R., Impey, C.D., & Sonam, T. (2017). Insights about large-scale online peer assessment from an analysis of an astronomy MOOC. Computers & Education, 113, 243–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S.E., & Savage, T. (2016). Comparing learner community behavior in multiple presentations of a massive open online course. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(3), 358–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genuer, R., Poggi, J.M., & Tuleau-Malot, C. (2010). Variable selection using random forests. Pattern Recognition Letters, 31(14), 2225–2236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31. Retrieved January 2, 2020, from http://eprints.glos.ac.uk/3609/.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, P.J., & Reinecke, K. (2014). Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp. 21–30). Atlanta, Georgia, USA. doi: 10.1145/2556325.2566247
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A.D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D.T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., & Chuang, I. (2014). HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses (HarvardX and MITx Working Paper No. 1). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2381263
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, J., & Nelson, B. (2014). Learner engagement-the lasting effect of announcements in online courses. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 334–340). Jacksonville, Florida, USA. Retrieved January 2, 2020, from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/130767/
   Google Scholar
• Hou, H.T., Chang, K.E., & Sung, Y.T. (2010). Applying lag sequential analysis to detect visual behavioural patterns of online learning activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), E25–E27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G.H., Chen, B., Chen, R.S., Wu, T.T., & Lai, Y.L. (2019). Differences between students’ learning behaviors and performances of adopting a competitive game-based item bank practice approach for learning procedural and declarative knowledge. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(5–6), 740–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, C. (2020). MOOC student dropout prediction model based on learning behavior features and parameter optimization. Interactive Learning Environments. doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1802300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, T., Soffer, T., & Nachmias, R. (2017). Types of participant behavior in a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizilcec, R.F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 170–179). Leuven, Belgium. doi: 10.1145/2460296.2460330
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Sharma, K., Pérez-Álvarez, R., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., & Broisin, J. (2019, September). Analyzing learners’ behavior beyond the MOOC: An exploratory study. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 40–54). Delft, Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_4
   Google Scholar
• Poellhuber, B., Roy, N., & Bouchoucha, I. (2019). Understanding participant’s behaviour in massively open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1), 221–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl, M., Wallner, G., & Kriglstein, S. (2016). Using lag-sequential analysis for understanding interaction sequences in visualizations. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 96, 54–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pursel, B.K., Zhang, L., Jablokow, K.W., Choi, G.W., & Velegol, D. (2016). Understanding MOOC students: Motivations and behaviours indicative of MOOC completion. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 202–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiperez-Valiente, J.A., Alexandron, G., Chen, Z., & Pritchard, D.E. (2016, April). Using multiple accounts for harvesting solutions in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the third ACM conference on learning@ scale (pp. 63–70). Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. doi: 10.1145/2876034.2876037
   Google Scholar
• Tan, Y., Zhang, X., Luo, H., Sun, Y., & Xu, S. (2018). Learning profiles, behaviors and outcomes: Investigating international students’ learning experience in an English MOOC. In 2018 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp. 214–218). Osaka, Japan. doi: 10.1109/iset.2018.00055
   Google Scholar
• Tang, S., Peterson, J.C., & Pardos, Z.A. (2016). Modelling student behavior using granular large scale action data from a MOOC. Retrieved January 2, 2020, from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.04789.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, S.F., Tsao, Y.W., Yu, L.C., Chan, C.L., & Lai, K.R. (2016). Who will pass? Analyzing learner behaviors in MOOCs. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(1), 8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watson, S.L., Watson, W.R., Yu, J.H., Alamri, H., & Mueller, C. (2017). Learner profiles of attitudinal learning in a MOOC: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Computers & Education, 114, 274–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehill, J., Mohan, K., Seaton, D., Rosen, Y., & Tingley, D. (2017). Delving deeper into MOOC student dropout prediction. Retrieved January 2, 2020, from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.06404.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wholey, J.S. (1996). Formative and summative evaluation: Related issues in performance measurement. American Journal of Evaluation, 17(2), 145–149.
   Google Scholar
• Woodgate, A., Macleod, H., Scott, A.M., & Haywood, J. (2015). Differences in online study behaviour between sub-populations of MOOC learners. Educación XX1, 18(2), 147–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, B., Liang, M., & Ma, J. (2018). The application of CART algorithm in analyzing relationship of MOOC learning behavior and grades. In 2018 International Conference on Sensor Networks and Signal Processing (pp. 250–254). Xi'an, China. doi: 10.1109/snsp.2018.00055
   Google Scholar
• Yang, T.C., Chen, S.Y., & Hwang, G.J. (2015). The influences of a two-tier test strategy on student learning: A lag sequential analysis approach. Computers & Education, 82, 366–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., & Yuan, B. (2016). Visualizing MOOC user behaviors: A case study on XuetangX. In International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning (pp. 89–98). Yanzhou, China. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46257-8_10
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Davis, D., Chen, G., Lofi, C., Hauff, C., & Houben, G.J. (2017). Certificate achievement unlocked: How does MOOC learners’ behaviour change? In Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (pp. 83–88). Bratislava, Slovakia. doi: 10.1145/3099023.3099063
   Google Scholar