Bibliography

• Ai Lin 哀林 – Shen Tongheng 沈同衡. 1990. Chengyu diangu 成语典故 [Chinese Idiomatic Expressions]. Shenyang: Liaoning jiaoyu chubanshe.
   Google Scholar
• Birkenmaier, Walter. 1976. “Die Funktion von odin im Russischen.” Zeitschrift für slavische Philologie 39 (1976) 1, pp. 43–59.
   Google Scholar
• Boltz, William G. 1985. “Desultory Notes on Language and Semantics in Ancient China” (A Review of Chad Hansen, Language and Logic in Ancient China). JAOS 105 (1985) 2, pp. 309–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borer, Hagit. 2005. In Name Only. Structuring Sense, 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brindley, Erica Fox. 2010. Individualism in Early China: Human Agency and the Self in Thought and Politics. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, Lewis. 1965. The Annotated Alice: Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass. Ed. Martin Gardner et al. London: The Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Fu’an 陈复庵 (trans.). 1981. Alisi manyou qijing ji 阿丽思慢游奇境记 [Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland]. Beijing: Zhongguo duiwai fanyi chubanshe.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Shou 陳壽. 1973. San guo zhi 三國志 [Records of the Three Kingdoms]. Ed. Chen Naiqian 陳乃乾. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Lisa L.-S. – Rint Sybesma. 1998. “Yi-wan tang, yi-ge Tang: Classifiers and Massifiers.” Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 28 (1998) 3, pp. 385–412.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Lisa L.-S. – Rint Sybesma. 1999. “Bare and Not-So-Bare Nouns and the Structure of NP.” Linguistic Inquiry 30 (1999) 4, pp. 509–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Lisa L.-S. – Jenny Doetjes – Rint Sybesma. 2008. “How Universal is the Universal Grinder?” Linguistics in the Netherlands 25 (2008), pp. 50–62. https://online resource, doi:10.1075/avt.2508che
   Google Scholar
• Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998a. “Plurality of Mass Nouns and the Notion of ‘Semantic Parameter’.” In: Susan Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 53–103.
   Google Scholar
• Chierchia, Gennaro.. 1998b. “Reference to Kinds across Languages.” Natural Language Semantics 6 (1998), pp. 339–405.
   Google Scholar
• Chierchia, Gennaro.. 2010. “Mass Nouns, Vagueness and Semantic Variation.” Synthese 174 (2010), pp. 99–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fei Xu. 1997. “From Lot’s Wife to a Pillar of Salt: Evidence that Physical Object is a Sortal Concept.” Mind and Language 12 (1997) 3–4, pp. 365–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, Paul 2012. “Erica Fox Brindley, Individualism in Early China (A Review).” The Journal of Religion 92 (2012) 1, pp. 158–159.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Chris. 2007. “Language and Ontology in Early Chinese Thought.” PEW 57 (2007) 4, pp. 420–456.
   Google Scholar
• Givón, Talmy. 1981. “On the Development of the Numeral ‘One’ as an Indefinite Marker.” Folia Linguistica Historica 2 (1981) 1, pp. 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Gorishneva, Elena. 2016. The Variety of Functions of the Numeral and Indefinite Marker “One” in Bulgarian and Russian. Herne: Gabriele Schäfer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gu Xuejie 顾学颉 (ed.). 1979. Bai Juyi ji 白居易集 [Collected Works by Bai Juyi]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.
   Google Scholar
• Guan Shaochun 管绍淳 – Zhao Mingfei 赵明菲 (trans.). 1981. Ailisi qiyu ji 爱丽丝奇遇记 [Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland]. Ürümci: Xinjiang renmin chubanshe.
   Google Scholar
• Guder, Andreas. 2005. “Eine Sprache ohne Numerus: Zur Pluralität im modernen Chinesisch.” In: Martina Maria Eglauer – Clemens Treter (eds.), Einheit und Vielfalt in China: Beiträge zum Pluralismus in der chinesischen Geistes- und Sozialgeschichte. Jahrbuch der Deutschen Vereinigung für Chinastudien, 1. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 245–268.
   Google Scholar
• Gurevič, Izabella (Изабелла Гуревич). 2008. Istoričeskaja grammatika kitajskogo jazyka: jazyk prozy na bajhua perioda Sun-Yuan – pinhua Историческая грамматика китайского языка: язык прозы на байхуа периода Сун-Юань – пинхуа [A Historical Grammar of Chinese: The baihua Language of Song and Yuan – pinghua]. St. Petersburg: Orientalia.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Chad. 1983. Language and Logic in Ancient China. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Chad.. 1985. “Individualism in Chinese Thought.” In: Donald J. Munro (ed.), Individualism and Holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist Values. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan, pp. 35–55.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Chad.. 1992. “Mass Terms and Scope Metaphysics.” In: id., A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 46–49.
   Google Scholar
• Harbsmeier, Christoph. 1991. “The Mass Noun Hypothesis and the Part-Whole Analysis of the White Horse Dialogue.” In: Henry Rosemont (ed.), Chinese Texts and Philosophical Contexts: Essays Dedicated to Angus C. Graham. La Salle: Open Court, pp. 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Harbsmeier, Christoph.. 1998. Science and Civilisation in China, Volume 7, Part 1: Language and Logic. Ed. Kenneth Robinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• He Ning 何宁 (ed.). 1998. Huainanzi ji shi 淮南子集釋 [The Masters of Huainan with Commentaries]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, Kenneth W. 2012. “Erica Fox Brindley, Individualism in Early China, A Review.” JAS 71 (2012) 1, pp. 199–200.
   Google Scholar
• Imai Mutsumi – Dedre Gentner. 1997. “A Cross-Linguistic Study of Early Word Meaning: Universal Ontology and Linguistic Influence.” Cognition 62 (1997), pp. 169–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii Mutsumi 石井睦美 (trans.). 2008. Fushigi no kuni no Arisu 不思議の国のアリス. Zürich: BL Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jespersen, Otto. 1992 [1924]. The Philosophy of Grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuang Peihua 匡佩华 – Liu Jun 刘军 (eds.). 2000. Hanyu chengyu yongfa cidian 汉语成语用法词典 [A Practical Dictionary of Chinese Idioms]. Beijing: Huayu jiaoxue chubanshe.
   Google Scholar
• Legge, James (ed., trans.). 1960a. The Chinese Classics, vol. 4: The She King. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Legge, James. (ed., trans.). 1960b. The Chinese Classics, vol. 2: The Works of Mencius. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liao Wenkui (trans.). 1939–1959. The Complete Works of Han Fei Tsu. London: Probsthain.
   Google Scholar
• Lin Jing – Jeannette Schaeffer. 2018. “Nouns are Both Mass and Count: Evidence from Unclassified Nouns in Adult and Child Mandarin Chinese.” Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3 (2018) 1, pp. 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Lydia H. 1996. “Translingual Practice: The Discourse of Individualism between China and the West.” In: Wimal Dissanayake (ed.), Narratives of Agency: Self-Making in China, India, and Japan. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, Edward Jonathan. 2015. More Kinds of Being: A Further Study of Individuation, Identity, and the Logic of Sortal Terms. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Loy Hui-Chieh. 2011. “Erica Fox Brindley, Individualism in Early China, A Review.” JCR 39 (2011), pp. 101–105.
   Google Scholar
• Ma Lin – Jaap van Brakel. 2016. Fundamentals of Comparative and Intercultural Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ma Teng 马腾 (trans.). 2016. Ailisi meng you xianjing 爱丽丝梦游仙境 [Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland]. Beijing: Lianhe chuban gongsi.
   Google Scholar
• Mengzi 孟子. In: Zhu Xi 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Mögling, Wilmar (trans.). 1984. Die Kunst der Staatsführung: Die Schriften des Meisters Han Fei. Leipzig: Gustav Kiepenheuer.
   Google Scholar
• Mou Bo. 1999. “The Structure of the Chinese Language and Ontological Insights: A Collective Noun Hypothesis.” PEW 49 (1999) 1, pp. 45–62.
   Google Scholar
• Nan Shan 南山 (ed.). 1991. Chengyu gushi 成语故事 (Idiomatic Stories). Xi’an: Shaanxi shifan daxue chubanshe.
   Google Scholar
• Pelletier, Francis Jeffry. 1975. “Non-Singular Reference: Some Preliminaries.” Philosophia 5 (1975) 4, pp. 451–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier, Francis Jeffry.. 2012. “Lexical Nouns Are Both MASS and COUNT, But They Are Neither MASS Nor COUNT.” In: Diane Massam (ed.), Count and Mass across Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–26.
   Google Scholar
• Perlmutter, David M. 1970. “On the Article in English.” In: Manfred Bierwisch – Karl Erich Heidolph (eds.), Progress in Linguistics: A Collection of Papers. The Hague – Paris: Mouton, pp. 233–248.
   Google Scholar
• Peyraube, Alain. 1991. “Some Remarks on the History of Chinese Classifiers.” In: Patricia M. Clancy and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Asian Discourse and Grammar. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, 3. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California, Santa Barbara, pp. 106–126.
   Google Scholar
• Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1995. Outline of Classical Chinese Grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, Willard. 1960. Word and Object. New York – London: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, Dan. 2000. “Mass Nouns and Count Nouns in Classical Chinese.” EC 25 (2000), pp. 147–184.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, Eleanor – Carolyn B. Mervis et al. 1976. “Basic Objects in Natural Categories.” Cognitive Psychology 7 (1976), pp. 573–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, Susan (ed.). 1998. Events and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, Susan. 2010. “Counting and the Mass/Count Distinction.” Journal of Semantics 27 (2010), pp. 343–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, Susan. 2017. Semantics for Counting and Measuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkissian, Hagop. 2012. “Erica Fox Brindley, Individualism in Early China, A Review.” PEW 62 (2012) 3, pp. 408–410.
   Google Scholar
• Seriu Hajime 芹生一 (trans.). 1979. Fushigi no kuni no Arisu ふしぎの国のアリス [Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland]. Tokyo: Kaiseisha.
   Google Scholar
• Sharvy, Richard. 1978. “Maybe English Has No Count Nouns: Notes on Chinese Semantics. An Essay in Metaphysics and Linguistics.” Studies in Language 2 (1978) 3, pp. 345–365.
   Google Scholar
• Shōno Kōkichi 生野幸吉 (trans.). 1971. Fushigi no kuni no Arisu ふしぎの国のアリス [Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland]. Tokyo: Fukuinkan bunko.
   Google Scholar
• Sima Qian 司馬遷. 1955. Shiji huizhu kaozheng 史記會注考證 [Records of the Grand Historian, A Commentated Edition]. Kametarō Takigawa 瀧川資言 (ed., comm.). Beijing: Wenxue guji chubanshe.
   Google Scholar
• Soja, Nancy – Susan Carey – Elizabeth S. Spelke. 1991. “Ontological Categories Guide Young Children’s Inductions of Word Meaning: Object Terms and Substance Terms.” Cognition 38 (1991), pp. 179–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tada Kōzō 多田幸蔵 (trans.). 1975. Fushigi no kuni no Arisu 不思議の国のアリス [Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland]. Tokyo: Obunsha.
   Google Scholar
• Tillemans, Tom J.F. 2016. “Count Nouns, Mass Nouns, and Translatability: The Case of Tibetan Buddhist Logical Literature.” In: Arindam Chakrabarti and Ralph Weber (eds.), Comparative Philosophy without Borders. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Waki Akiko 脇明子 (trans.). 1998. Fushigi no kuni no Arisu 不思議の国のアリス [Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Qiangheng 王强横 (ed.). 1993. Liezi 列子. Guiyang: Guizhou renmin chubanshe.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Shouqian 王守谦 – Yu Fangkui 喻芳葵 et al. (eds.). 1992. Zhanguo ce 戰國策 [The Strategies of the Warring States]. Guiyang: Guizhou renmin chubanshe.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Tianming 王天明 (ed.). 1991. Zhongguo gudai chengyu gushi xuan (Han Ying dui zhao) 中国古代成语故事选 (英汉对照) / Selected Tales from Ancient Chinese Set Phrases (Chinese/English). Beijing: Xueyuan chubanshe.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Xianshen 王先慎 (ed.). 1998. Hanfeizi ji jie 韓非子集解 [The Commentated Hanfeizi]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, Anna. 1985. “‘Oats’ and ‘Wheat’: The Fallacy of Arbitrariness.” In: John Hayman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax: Proceedings on a Symposium on Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 311–342.
   Google Scholar
• Willman, Marshall D. 2018. “On the Comparative Analysis of Chinese Measure Words: Insights from Evolutionary Theory.” In: Mou Bo 牟博 (ed.), Philosophy of Language, Chinese Language, Chinese Philosophy. Leiden et al.: Brill, pp. 170–186.
   Google Scholar
• Wisniewski, Edward – Christopher Lamb – Erica Middleton. 2003. “On the Conceptual Basis for the Count and Mass Noun Distinction.” Language and Cognitive Processes 18 (2003) 5–6, pp. 583–624.
   Google Scholar
• Yan Yunxiang. 2000. “Introduction: Conflicting Images of the Individual and Contested Process of Individualization.” In: Mette Halskov Hansen – Rune Starverud (eds.), iChina: The Rise of the Individual in Modern Chinese Society. Copenhagen: NIAS Press, pp. 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Xiaomei. 2011. “Do Differences in Grammatical Form between Languages Explain Differences in Ontology between Different Philosophical Traditions? – A Critique of the Mass-Noun Hypothesis.” Dao 10 (2011), pp. 149–166.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Niina Ning. 2013. Classifier Structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Yuanren [Chao Yuen Ren 趙元任]. 1970. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Yuanren [Chao Yuen Ren 趙元任. (trans.). 1988 [1921]. Alisi manyou qijing ji 阿丽思慢游奇境记 [Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland]. Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu Haoyi 朱浩一 (trans.). 2016. Ailisi mengyou xianjing 愛麗絲夢遊仙境 [Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland]. Taipei: Zhiji tushu.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu Hongguo 朱洪国 (trans.). 1987. Ailisi manyou qijing ji 艾丽思慢游奇境记 [Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland]. Chengdu: Sichuan shaonian ertong chubanshe.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu Xi 朱熹 (ed.). 2008. Sishu zhangju jizhu 四書章句集注. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.
   Google Scholar
• Zhuangzi 莊子. 1999. Ed. Wu Zhaoji 吳兆基. Beijing: Jinghua chubanshe.
   Google Scholar