The “What Is Happening in This Class” Questionnaire: A Qualitative Examination in Elementary Classrooms

References

• Adamski, A., Fraser, B. J., & Peiro, M. M. (2013). Parental involvement in schooling, classroom environment and student outcomes. Learning Environments Research, 16, 315–328. doi:10.1007/s10984-012-9121-7
   Google Scholar
• Adelman, H. S., & Taylor, L. (2005). Classroom climate. In S. W. Lee (Ed.), Encyclopedia of school psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). A cross-cultural study of classroom learning environments in Australia and Taiwan. Learning Environments Research, 3, 101–134. doi:10.1023/A:1026599727439
   Google Scholar
• Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Outcomes-focused learning environments: Determinants and effects ( Advances in Learning Environments Research series). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Huang, I. T.-C. (1999). Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research methods. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 48–62. doi:10.1080/00220679909597628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Ntuli, S. (2009). Utilising learning environment assessments to improve teaching practices among in-service teachers undertaking a distance-education programme. South African Journal of Education, 29, 147–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexiadou, N. (2001). Researching policy implementation: Interview data analysis in institutional contexts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 4, 51–69. doi:10.1080/13645570118105
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D., & Fraser, B. J. (2007). Parent and student perceptions of the classroom learning environment and its association with student outcomes. Learning Environments Research, 10, 67–82. doi:10.1007/s10984-007-9018-z
   Google Scholar
• Barter, C., & Renold, E. (2000). “I wanna tell you a story”: Exploring the application of vignettes in qualitative research with children and young people. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3, 307–323. doi:10.1080/13645570050178594
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2006). Introduction to qualitative research in education (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Boudrislis, N., & Avgerinou, M. (2004). Πλεονεκτήματα και μειονεκτήματα εφαρμογής της μεθόδου project στην Περιβαλλοντική Εκπαίδευση και στην Αγωγή Υγείας [Advantages and disadvantages of the application of project-based learning in environmental and health education]. Modern Education, 137, 116–120.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, D., & Murphy, K. (2009). Issues in using methodological triangulation in research. Nurse Researcher, 16, 40–55. doi:10.7748/nr2009.07.16.4.40.c7160
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chapman, F. (2012). Use of exchange-of-knowledge method for enhancing classroom environment and students’ attitudes and achievements in mathematics ( Unpublished doctoral thesis). Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Charalambous, K., & Kokkinos, C. M. (2011b, April). The model of interpersonal teacher behavior: A qualitative cross-cultural validation within the Greek elementary education context. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana.
   Google Scholar
• Charalampous, K., & Kokkinos, C. M. (2011a, January). A cross-cultural adaptation of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction for Greek elementary students with the application of mixed-methods approach. Paper presented at the 24th International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Limassol, Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Charalampous, K., & Kokkinos, C. M. (2013). The model of interpersonal teacher behavior: A qualitative cross-cultural validation within the Greek elementary education context. British Educational Research Journal, 39, 182–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching-Tse, D. L. (2013). Learning environments in English classrooms in Singapore: Determinants and effects ( Unpublished doctoral thesis). Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Chionh, Y. H., & Fraser, B. J. (2009). Classroom environment, achievement, attitudes and self-esteem in geography and mathematics in Singapore. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 18, 29–44. doi:10.1080/10382040802591530
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Democritus University of Thrace. (2014). Undergraduate program of studies. Alexandroupolis, Greece: Department of Primary Education, School of Educational Sciences, Democritus University of Thrace.
   Google Scholar
• Den Brok, P., Fisher, D. L., Rickards, T., & Bull, E. (2006). Californian science students’ perceptions of their classroom learning environments. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 3–25. doi:10.1080/13803610500392053
   Google Scholar
• Dimopoulos, K., Dalkavouki, K., & Koulaidis, V. (2015). Job realities of primary school principals in Greece: Similarities and variations in a highly centralized system. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 18, 197–224. doi:10.1080/13603124.2014.954627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman, J. P. (2003). Cross-national validation of the What Is Happening In This Class? (WIHIC) Questionnaire using confirmatory factor analysis. Learning Environments Research, 6, 231–245. doi:10.1023/A:1027355123577
   Google Scholar
• Dorman, J. P. (2008). Use of multitrait-multimethod modelling to validate actual and preferred forms of the What Is Happening In This Class? (WIHIC) Questionnaire. Learning Environments Research, 11, 179–193. doi:10.1007/s10984-008-9043-6
   Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kungäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fen, G. S. (2014). The learning environment in Singapore primary science classrooms: The ideal and the real ( Unpublished doctoral thesis). Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, P. D., & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Changes in learning environment during the transition from primary to secondary school. Learning Environments Research, 1, 369–383. doi:10.1023/A:1009976529957
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1983). Use of WES to assess science teachers’ perceptions of school environment. European Journal of Science Education, 5, 231–233. doi:10.1080/0140528830050210
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. L., & Khine, M. S. (Eds.). (2006). Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. L., Waldrip, B., Dorman, J., & Den Brok, P. (2007, April). Interpersonal behaviour styles of science teachers in primary education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. (1986). Classroom environment. London, England: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. (1998a). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity, and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7–33. doi:10.1023/A:1009932514731
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. (1998b). Science learning environments: Assessments, effects and determinants. In B. J. Fraser, & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 527–564). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. (2007). Classroom learning environments. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 103–124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1191–1239). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J., Aldridge, J. M., & Adolphe, F. G. (2010). A cross-national study of secondary science classroom environments in Australia and Indonesia. Research in Science Education, 40, 551–571. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9133-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J., & McRobbie, C. J. (1995). Science laboratory classroom environments at schools and universities: A cross-national study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 1, 289–317. doi:10.1080/1380361950010401
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1996, April). Development, validation and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (1991). Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences. London, England: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Freiberg, H. J. (Ed.). (1999). School climate: Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments. London, England: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Freiberg, H. J., & Stein, T. A. (1999). Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments. In H. J. Freiberg (Ed.), School climate: Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments (pp. 11–29). London, England: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, S. C., & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Teacher interpersonal behaviour, classroom environment and student outcomes in primary mathematics in Singapore. Learning Environments Research, 1, 199–229. doi:10.1023/A:1009910017400
   Google Scholar
• Goh, S. C., & Khine, M. S. (Eds.). (2002). Studies in educational learning environments. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Haney, W., Russell, M., Gulek, C., & Fierros, E. (1998). Drawing on education: Using student drawings to promote middle school improvement. Schools in the Middle, 7, 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldi, S., Filippatou, D., & Govaris, C. (2011). Project-based learning in primary schools: Effects on pupils’ learning and attitudes. Education 3-13, 39, 35–47. doi:10.1080/03004270903179538
   Google Scholar
• Kokkinos, C. M., Charalambous, K., & Davazoglou, A. (2009). Interpersonal teacher behaviour in primary school classrooms: A cross-cultural validation of a Greek translation of the questionnaire on teacher interaction. Learning Environments Research, 12, 101–114. doi:10.1007/s10984-009-9056-9
   Google Scholar
• Koul, R. (2003). Teacher-student interactions and classroom learning environments in India ( Unpublished doctoral thesis). Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Koutsampelas, C., & Tsakloglou, P. (2015). The progressivity of public education in Greece: Empirical findings and policy implications. Education Economics, 23, 596–611. doi:10.1080/09645292.2014.884999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. (1992). Group child interviews as a research tool. British Educational Research Journal, 18, 413–421. doi:10.1080/0141192920180407
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, C. (Ed.). (2014). Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments: Procedures, measures, findings and policy implications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Moos, R. H., & Trickett, E. J. (1986). Classroom environment scale manual: An overview. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1993). Qualitative content analysis: A guide to paths not taken. Qualitative Health Research, 3, 112–121. doi:10.1177/104973239300300107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. (2014). Updated program of studies for the 2014-2015 academic year. Athens, Greece: National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Department of Primary Education.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, D. G., Serovich, J. M., & Mason, T. L. (2005). Constraints and opportunities with interview transcription: Towards reflection in qualitative research. Social Forces, 84, 1273–1289. doi:10.1353/sof.2006.0023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). Education policy advice for Greece: Strong performers and successful reformers in education. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Paoletti, I. (1990). Interpreting classroom climate: A study in a year five and six class. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3, 113–137. doi:10.1080/0951839900030202
   Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou, E. C., & Angeli, C. (2008). Evaluating the use of ICT in education: Psychometric properties of the Survey of Factors Affecting Teachers Teaching with Technology (SFA-T3). Educational Technology & Society, 11, 69–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peer, J. (2011). Gender, grade-level and stream differences in learning environment and student attitudes in primary science classrooms in Singapore ( Unpublished doctoral thesis). Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett, L. H., & Fraser, B. J. (2002, April). The role of learning environment, achievement, and student and teacher attitudes in a science mentoring program for beginning elementary school teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Rainer, J., & Guyton, E. (1999). Democratic practices in teacher education and the elementary classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 121–132. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00039-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society, 8, 165–187. doi:10.1177/0957926597008002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, R. H., & Fisher, D. L. (2004). Development, validation and application of a Malay translation of an elementary version of the questionnaire on teacher interaction. Research in Science Education, 34, 173–194. doi:10.1023/B:RISE.0000033759.09807.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, Β. Β., & Fraser, Β. J. (2002). Changing classroom environments in urban middle schools. Learning Environments Research, 5, 301–328. doi:10.1023/A:1021976307020
   Google Scholar
• Stetson, R. (2005). The relationships among student social acceptance, learning characteristics, and perception of classroom environment in a Canadian middle school ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Telli, S., Den Brok, P., & Cakiroglu, J. (2007). Students’ perceptions of science teachers’ interpersonal behaviour in secondary schools: Development of a Turkish version of the questionnaire on teacher interaction. Learning Environments Research, 10, 115–129. doi:10.1007/s10984-007-9023-2
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, R. M. (2005). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal of Quality in Health Care, 19, 349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. General Accounting Office. (1996). Content analysis: A methodology for structuring and analyzing written material. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Walberg, H. J., & Anderson, G. J. (1968). Classroom climate and individual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 414–419. doi:10.1037/h0026490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, M., & Ebbutt, D. (1987). More than the sum of parts: Research methods in group interviewing. British Educational Research Journal, 13, 25–34. doi:10.1080/0141192870130103
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38, 321–341. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9052-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wubbels, T., Créton, H., Brekelmans, J. M. G., & Hooymayers, H. P. (1987). De perceptie van de leraar-leerling relatie; constructie en kenmerken van een instrument [The perception of the teacher-pupil relationship; construction and characteristics of an instrument]. Tijdschrift Voor Onderwijsresearch, 12, 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Wubbels, T., Créton, H., Levy, J., & Hooymayers, H. (1993). The model for interpersonal behaviour. In T. Wubbels & J. Levy (Eds.), Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relations in education (pp. 13–28). London, England: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., & Campbell, T. (2012). An exploration of the potential impact of the integrated experiential learning curriculum in Beijing, China. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 1093–1123. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.625057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar