A Stacked Approach to Reading Intervention: Increasing 2nd- and 3rd-Graders’ Independent Reading Levels With an Intervention Program

References

• Afflerbach, P. (2016). Reading assessment: Looking ahead. The Reading Teacher, 69(4), 413–419. doi:10.1002/trtr.2016.69.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, R. D. (1972). A comparison of the neurological impress method: The language experience approach, and classroom teaching for children with reading disabilities. Final report. Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 073428)
   Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J. E., Nolan, G., & Zanotti, R. J. (1980). Training auditory perceptions problems: The NIM helps. Academic Therapy, 15, 473–481.
   Google Scholar
• Dooley, C. M., & Assaf, L. C. (2009). Contexts matter: Two teachers’ language arts instruction in this high-stakes era. Journal of Literacy Research, 41, 354–391. doi:10.1080/10862960903133743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldredge, J. L. (1990). Increasing reading performance of poor readers in the third grade by using a group assisted strategy. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 69–77. doi:10.1080/00220671.1990.10885995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldredge, J. L., & Butterfield, D. D. (1986). Alternatives to traditional reading instruction. The Reading Teacher, 40, 32–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldredge, J. L., & Quinn, W. (1988). Increasing reading performance of low-achieving second graders by using dyad reading groups. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 40–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, E. (1966). Listen, my children, and you shall read. English Journal, 55, 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckelman, R. G. (1966). Using the neurological impress remedial reading method. Academic Therapy, 1, 235–239.
   Google Scholar
• Heckelman, R. G. (1969). A neurological-impress method of remedial-reading instruction. Academic Therapy, 4, 277–282. doi:10.1177/105345126900400406
   Google Scholar
• Henk, W. A. (1981). Neurological impress and reading: How? and Why? In The thirteenth annual three rivers reading conference proceedings, Pittsburgh, PA. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED220815)
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, P. M. (1970). An experiment with the impress method of teaching reading. The Reading Teacher, 24, 112–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, P. M. (1978). An experimental approach to the impress method of teaching reading. The Reading Teacher, 31, 624–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Educational Sciences. (2015). Nation’s report card. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2015/#reading/acl?grade=4
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. D., Johnson, B., Farenga, S. J., & Ness, D. (2008). Stop high-stakes testing: An appeal to America’s conscience. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., & Samuels, J. (1974). Towards a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathes, P. G. (2007). ISIP concurrent and predicative validity. Dallas, TX: Istation. Retrieved from http://www1.istation.com/research/pdfs/isipcv.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mathes, P. G., & Fuchs, E. S. (1993). Peer-mediated reading instruction in special education resource rooms. Learning Disability Research and Practice, 8(4), 233–243.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, C. D., Campbell, K. U., Miller, M. D., Mercer, K. D., & Lane, H. B. (2000). Effects of a reading fluency intervention for middle schoolers with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disability Research and Practice, 15(4), 179–189. doi:10.1207/SLDRP1504_2
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, K. A. J., Dixon, K., & Young, C. J. (2012). Effective and efficient: Maximizing literacy assessment and instruction. In E. T. Ortlieb & E. H. Cheek Jr. (Eds.), Literacy research, practice, and evaluation: Vol. 1. Using informative assessments for effective literacy practices. Bingley, England: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the national reading panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH publication no. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 317–344. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(83)90019-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J. (2005). Fluency: Bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58, 510–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T., & Young, C. (2014). Assisted reading – A bridge from fluency to comprehension. New England Reading Association Journal, 50(1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 41, 756–760.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406. doi:10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadasy, P. F., & Sanders, E. A. (2008). Repeated reading intervention: Outcomes and interactions with readers’ skills and classroom instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 272–290. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valencia, S. W., & Buly, M. R. (2004). Behind test scores: What struggling readers really need. The Reading Teacher, 57, 520–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Chard, D. J., Bryant, D. P., Coleman, M., & Kouzekanani, K. (2000). Fluency and comprehension interventions for third-grade students. Remedial and Special Education, 21(6), 325–335. doi:10.1177/074193250002100602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., & Denckla, M. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 601–638. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilfong, L. G. (2008). Building fluency, word-recognition ability, and confidence in struggling readers: The poetry academy. The Reading Teacher, 62(1), 4–13. doi:10.1598/RT.62.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, C., Mohr, K A. J., & Rasinski, T. (2015). Reading together: A successful reading fluency intervention. Literacy Research and Instruction, 54(1), 67–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, C., & Rasinski, T. (2009). Implementing readers theatre as an approach to classroom fluency instruction. Reading Teacher, 63(1), 4–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, C., Rasinski, T., & Mohr, K. A. J. (2016). Read Two Impress: An intervention for disfluent readers. Reading Teacher, 69(6), 633–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, C., Valadez, C., & Gandara, C. (2016). Using performance methods to enhance students’ reading fluency. Journal of Educational Research, 109(6), 624–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zutell, J., & Rasinski, T. V. (1991). Training teachers to attend to their students’ oral reading fluency. Theory Into Practice, 30(3), 211–217.
   Google Scholar