Literacy, power and practices: taking a discourse-ethnographic approach to exploring adult literacy practices in Pakistan and the UK

References

• Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Mediatization and sociolinguistic change: Key concepts, research traditions, open issues. In J. Androutsopoulos (Ed.), Mediatization and sociolinguistic change (pp. 3–48). Berlin: Mouton De Grutyer.
   Google Scholar
• Author. (2018). Home literacies: The access and availability of written material in the homes of mirpuri migrants in Pakistan and the UK. In S. Bahun & B. Petrić Eds., Thinking home: Interdisciplinary dialogues (pp. 116–119). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, B., & Heller, M. (2007). Bilingualism: A social approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy practices. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanič (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7–15). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D., & Lee, C. (2013). Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgardner, R. J. (ed.). (1993). The english language in Pakistan. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackledge, A. (2005). Discourse and power in a multilingual world. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. (2008). Grassroots literacy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, D., & Clinton, K. (2002). Limits of the local: Expanding perspectives on literacy as a social practice. Journal of Literacy Research, 34(3), 337–356. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3403_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capstick, T. (2016a). Multilingual literacies, identities and ideologies: Exploring chain migration from Pakistan to the UK. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Capstick, T. (2016b). Literacy mediation in marriage migration from Pakistan to the United Kingdom: Appropriating bureaucratic discourses to get a visa. Discourse and Society, 27(5), 481–499. doi:10.1177/0957926516651220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, H., & Capstick, T. (2012). Language in education in Pakistan: Policy recommendations. Islamabad: British Council Pakistan. Retrieved from http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/Language%20In%20Education%20in%20Pakistan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Duckworth, V, & Tett, L. (2019). Transformative and emancipatory literacy to empower. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Goodhart, D. (2013). The British dream: Successes and failures of post-war immigration. London: Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Harriss, K., & Shaw, A. (2008). Kinship obligations, gender and the life course: re-writing migration from Pakistan to Britain. In V. S. Kalra (Ed.), Pakistani diasporas: Culture, conflict, and change (pp. 19–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalman, J. (2005). Discovering literacy: Access routes to written culture for a group of women in Mexico. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M. (2008). Analysing focus group discussions. In R. Wodak & M. Krzyżanowski (Eds.), Qualitative discourse analysis in the socials sciences (pp. 162–181). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2011). Political strategies and language policies: The ‘rise and fall’ of the EU Lisbon Strategy and its implications for the Union’s multilingualism policy. Language Policy, 10(2), 115–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lothers, M., & Lothers, L. (2007). Pahari/Potwari Survey report. FLA Language and culture series, No. 2 Rawalpindi, Pakistan: Frontier Language Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Maybin, J. (2000). The new literacy studies: Context, intertextuality and discourse. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanič (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 197–209). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papen, U. (2005). Adult literacy as social practice: More than skills. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203347119
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, T. (2004). Denizens of alien worlds: A study of education, inequality and polarization in pakistan. OUP Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 87–122). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Street, Brian. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. (2013). Global initiative on out-of-school children. New York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (1984). Prejudice in discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of discourse. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2008). Introduction: Discourse studies – Important concepts and terms. In R. Wodak & M. Krzyżanowski (Eds.), Qualitative discourse analysis in the social sciences (pp. 1–29). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2011). ‘Us’ and ‘them’: Inclusion and exclusion – Discrimination via discourse. In G. Delanty, R. Wodak, & P. Jones (Eds.), Identity, belonging and migration (pp. 54–77). Liverpool: University of Liverpool Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., Krzyżanowski, M., & Forchtner, B. (2012). The interplay of language ideologies and contextual cues in multilingual interactions: Language choice and code-switching in european union institutions. Language in Society, 41(2), 157–186. doi:10.1017/S0047404512000036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolard, K. A. (1998). Simultaneity and bivalency as strategies in bilingualism. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 8(1), 3–29. doi:10.1525/jlin.1998.8.issue-1
   Google Scholar