Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in‐class and online surveys: their effects on response rates and evaluations

References

• Bosnjak , M and Tuten , TL . (2003) . Prepaid and promised incentives in Web surveys . Social Science Computer Review , 21 (2) : 208 – 217 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centra JA (1993) Reflective faculty evaluation: enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness (San Francisco, CA, Jossey‐Bass)
   Google Scholar
• Cobanoglu , C and Cobanoglu , N . (2003) . The effect of incentives in web surveys: application and ethical considerations . International Journal of Market Research , 45 (4) : 475 – 488 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costin , F . (1968) . A graduate course in the teaching of psychology: description and evaluation . Journal of Teacher Education , 19 (4) : 425 – 432 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford , SD , Couper , MP and Lamias , MJ . (2001) . Web surveys: perceptions of burden . Social Science Computer Review , 19 (2) : 146 – 162 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dommeyer , CJ , Baum , P , Chapman , KS and Hanna , RW . (2002a) . Attitudes of business faculty toward two methods of collecting teaching evaluations: paper vs. online . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 27 (5) : 445 – 462 .
   Google Scholar
• Dommeyer , CJ , Baum , P and Hanna , RW . (2002b) . College students' attitudes towards methods of collecting teaching evaluations: in‐class vs. online . Journal of Education for Business , 78 (1) : 11 – 15 .
   Google Scholar
• Feldman , KA . (1979) . The significance of circumstances for college students' ratings of their teachers and courses . Research in Higher Education , 10 (2) : 149 – 172 .
   Google Scholar
• Franklin J Theall M (1989) Who reads ratings: knowledge, attitudes, and practice of users of student ratings of instruction paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association San Francisco, April
   Google Scholar
• Ha TS Marsh J (1998) Using the web for student evaluation of teaching: COSSET & OSTEI paper presented at the Quality in Teaching and Learning Conference Hong Kong, December
   Google Scholar
• Ha TS Marsh J Jones J (1998) A Web‐based system for teaching evaluation paper presented at the NCITT'98 Conference Hong Kong, May
   Google Scholar
• Henderson T (2001) Classroom assessment techniques in asynchronous learning networks The Technology Source Sept./Oct. Available online at: http://ts.mivu.org/default.asp?show= article&id=908
   Google Scholar
• Hmieleski K Champagne MV (2000) Plugging in to course evaluation The Technology Source Sept./Oct. Available online at: http://ts.mivu.org/default.asp?show= article&id=795
   Google Scholar
• Kronholm EA Wisher RA Curnow CK Poker F (1999) The transformation of a distance learning enterprise to an Internet base: from advertising to evaluation paper presented at the Northern Arizona University NAU/Web99 Conference Flagstaff, AZ
   Google Scholar
• Ku S (2002/2003) Marshall online teaching evaluation system Faculty Forum 4 (1) Available online at: http://www.usc.edu/academe/acsen/resources/newsletter/0203v4n1/0203v4n1_ article06.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Layne , BH , DeCristoforo , JR and McGinty , D . (1999) . Electronic versus traditional student ratings of instruction . Research in Higher Education , 40 (2) : 221 – 232 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss , J and Hendry , G . (2002) . Use of electronic surveys in course evaluation . British Journal of Educational Technology , 33 (5) : 583 – 592 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ory J (1990) Student ratings of instruction: ethics and practice in: Theall, M. & Franklin, J. (Eds) Student ratings of instruction: issues for improving practice (San Francisco, CA, Jossey‐Bass) 63 74
   Google Scholar
• Reid , IC . (2001) . Reflections on using the Internet for the evaluation of course delivery . The Internet and Higher Education , 4 (1) : 61 – 75 .
   Google Scholar
• Simpson , PM and Siguaw . (2000) . Student evaluations of teaching: an exploratory study of the faculty response . Journal of Marketing Education , 22 (3) : 199 – 213 .
   Google Scholar