Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: an attempt to deepen learning?

References

• Ballantyne , R. , Hughes , K. and Mylonas , A. 2002 . Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 27 ( 5 ) : 427 – 41 .
   Google Scholar
• Boud , D. 1995 . “ Assessment and learning: Contradictory or complimentary? ” . In Assessment for learning in Higher Education , Edited by: Knight , P. 35 – 48 . London : Kogan Page .
   Google Scholar
• Boud , D. and Holmes , H. 1995 . “ Self and peer marking in a large technical subject ” . In Enhancing learning through self assessment , Edited by: Boud , D. 63 – 78 . London : Kogan page .
   Google Scholar
• Bourner , T. 2003 . Assessing reflective practice . Journal of Education and Training , 45 ( 5 ) : 267
   Google Scholar
• Brown , S. , Rust , C. and Gibbs , G. 1994 . “ Involving students in the assessment process ” . In Strategies for diversifying assessments in Higher Education , Oxford : Oxford Centre for Staff Development .
   Google Scholar
• Davies , P. 2006 . Peer assessment: Judging the quality of students’ work by comments rather than marks . Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 43 ( 1 ) : 69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson , A. and Topping , K. 1996 . Promoting peer assisted learning amongst students in Higher and Further Education , paper 96 Birmingham : Staff and Educational Development Association Conference .
   Google Scholar
• Elliott , N. and Higgins , A. 2005 . Self and peer assessment: Does it make a difference to student group work? . Nurse Education in Practice , 5 ( 1 ) : 40 – 48 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elwood , J. 2006 . Formative assessment: Possibilities, boundaries and limitations . Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice , 13 ( 2 ) : 215 – 32 .
   Google Scholar
• Grieves , J. , McMillan , J. and Wilding , P. 2006 . Barriers to learning: Conflicts that occur between and within organisational systems . International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital , 3 ( 1 ) : 86 – 103 .
   Google Scholar
• Hartley , J. 1998 . Learning and studying , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Hawk , T. and Shah , A. 2007 . Using learning style instruments to enhance student learning: Decision sciences . Journal of Innovative Education , 5 ( 1 ) : 1 – 19 .
   Google Scholar
• Janes , D. 2007 . Self, peer and group assessment in e‐learning . British Journal of Educational Technology , 38 ( 1 ) : 175 – 76 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laverick , A. 2007 . Motivation, metacognition, mentors, and money: Ingredients that support teaching expertise . Early Childhood Education Journal , 34 ( 4 ) : 247 – 49 .
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom , S. , Pihlajamaki , S. and Kotkas , T. 2006 . Self, peer and teacher assessment of student essays . Active Learning in Higher Education , 7 ( 1 ) : 51
   Google Scholar
• Liu , N. and Carless , D. 2006 . Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment . Teaching in Higher Education , 11 ( 3 ) : 279 – 90 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall , C. and Rossman , G. 2006 . Designing qualitative research , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• McDowell , L. and Mowl , G. 1996 . “ Innovative assessment: Its impact on students ” . In Improving student learning through assessment and evaluation , Edited by: Gibbs , G. 131 – 147 . Oxford : The Oxford Centre for Staff Development .
   Google Scholar
• Morris , J. 2001 . Peer assessment: A missing link between teaching and learning? A review of the literature . Nurse Education Today , 21 : 507 – 15 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsmond , P. 2006 . Self‐ and peer assessment: Guidance on practice in the biosciences , York : Higher Education Academy .
   Google Scholar
• Papinczak , T. , Young , L. and Groves , M. 2007 . Peer assessment in problem‐based learning: A qualitative study . Advances in Health Sciences Education , 12 ( 2 ) : 169 – 86 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Race , P. 1995 . The art of assessing . New Academic , Autumn 2005 : 3 – 5 .
   Google Scholar
• Race , P. 1998 . “ Practical pointers in peer assessment ” . In Peer assessment in practice , (Staff and Educational Development Association paper 102) Edited by: Brown , S. 113 – 122 . Birmingham : Staff and Educational Development Association Conference .
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden , P. 1992 . Learning to teach in Higher Education , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Rayner , S. 2007 . A teaching elixir, learning chimera or just fool’s gold? Do learning styles matter? . Support for Learning , 22 ( 1 ) : 24 – 30 .
   Google Scholar
• Robson , C. 2002 . Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner researchers , London : Blackwell .
   Google Scholar
• Roulston , K. , Legette , R. and Deloach , M. 2005 . What is research for teacher‐researchers? . Educational Action Research , 13 ( 2 ) : 169 – 189 .
   Google Scholar
• Rowland , S. 2000 . The enquiring university teacher , Buckinghamshire : Open University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans , D. 2006 . A conceptual framework for integrating peer assessment in teacher education . Studies in Educational Evaluation , 32 ( 1 ) : 6
   Google Scholar
• Stefani , L. 1994 . Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities . Studies in Higher Education , 19 ( 1 ) : 69 – 75 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping , K. 1996 . Effective peer tutoring in Further and Higher Education , (Staff Educational Development Association Paper 95) Birmingham : Staff Educational Development Association Conference .
   Google Scholar
• Truman , C. 2003 . Ethics and the ruling relations of research production . Sociological Research Online , 8 ( 1 ) http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/1/truman.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Berg , I. 2006a . Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in Higher Education . Studies in Higher Education , 31 ( 3 ) : 341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Berg , I. 2006b . Peer assessment in university teaching: Evaluating seven course designs . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 31 ( 1 ) : 19
   Google Scholar
• Wen , L. 2006 . Attitudes towards peer assessment: A comparison of the perspectives of pre‐service and in‐service teachers . Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 43 ( 1 ) : 83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorke , M. 1998 . Capability and quality in Higher Education , London : Kogan page .
   Google Scholar
• Zariski , A. Student peer assessment in tertiary education: Promise, perils and practice. In Teaching and learning within and across disciplines . Proceedings of the 5th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, February 1996 . Perth : Murdoch University .
   Google Scholar