2,510
Views
79
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

An inventory of peer assessment diversity

, &
Pages 137-155 | Published online: 25 Jan 2010

References

  • Ballantyne , R. , Hughes , K. and Mylonas , A. 2002 . Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 27 : 427 – 41 .
  • Bloxham , S. and West , A. 2004 . Understanding the rules of the game: Marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students' conceptions of assessment . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 29 : 721 – 33 .
  • Boud , D. 2000 . Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society . Studies in Continuing Education , 22 : 151 – 67 .
  • Cheng , W. and Warren , M. 1999 . Peer and teacher assessment of the oral and written tasks of a group project . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 24 : 301 – 14 .
  • Cheng , W. and Warren , M. 2000 . Making a difference: Using peers to assess individual students' contributions to a group project . Teaching in Higher Education , 5 : 243 – 55 .
  • Cho , K. , Schunn , C.D. and Wilson , R.W. 2006 . Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives . Journal of Educational Psychology , 98 : 891 – 901 .
  • Falchikov , N. 1995 . “ Improving feedback to and from students ” . In Assessment for learning in higher education , Edited by: Knight , P. 157 – 66 . London : Kogan Page .
  • Falchikov , N. and Goldfinch , J. 2000 . Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta‐analysis comparing peer and teacher marks . Review of Educational Research , 70 : 287 – 322 .
  • Gibbs , G. 1999 . “ Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn ” . In Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches , Edited by: Brown , S. and Glasner , A. 41 – 53 . Buckingham : SRHE/Open University Press .
  • Gielen , S. 2007 . “ Peer assessment as a tool for learning ” . Katholieke Universiteit . Doctoral diss.
  • Langan , A.M. , Wheater , C.P. , Shaw , E.M. , Haines , B.J. , Cullen , W.R. , Boyle , J.C. Penney , D. 2005 . Peer assessment of oral presentations: Effects of student gender, university affiliation and participation in the development of assessment criteria . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 30 : 21 – 34 .
  • Lockhart , C. and Ng , P. 1995 . Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions and content . Language Learning , 45 : 605 – 55 .
  • Magin , D. and Helmore , P. 2001 . Peer and teacher assessments of oral presentation skills: How reliable are they? . Studies in Higher Education , 26 : 287 – 98 .
  • Malcolmson , C. and Shaw , J. 2005 . The use of self‐ and peer‐contribution assessments within a final year pharmaceutics assignment . Pharmacy Education , 5 : 169 – 74 .
  • McGourty , J. 2000 . Using multisource feedback in the classroom: A computer‐based approach . IEEE Transactions on Education , 43 : 120 – 4 .
  • Miller , P. 2003 . The effect of scoring criteria specificity on peer and self‐assessment . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 28 : 383 – 94 .
  • Nicol , D.J. and Macfarlane‐Dick , D. 2006 . Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice . Studies in Higher Education , 31 : 199 – 218 .
  • Norcini , J.J. 2003 . Peer assessment of competence . Medical Education , 37 : 539 – 43 .
  • Oldfield , K.A. and MacAlpine , J.M.K. 1995 . Peer and self‐assessment at tertiary level: An experiential report . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 20 : 125 – 31 .
  • Omelicheva , M. 2005 . Self and peer evaluation in undergraduate education: Structuring conditions that maximize its promises and minimize the perils . Journal of Political Science Education , 1 : 191 – 205 .
  • Orsmond , P. , Merry , S. and Reiling , K. 1996 . The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 21 : 239 – 50 .
  • Orsmond , P. , Merry , S. and Reiling , K. 2000 . The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self‐assessment . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 25 : 23 – 38 .
  • Orsmond , P. , Merry , S. and Reiling , K. 2002 . The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using student derived marking criteria in peer and self‐assessment . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 27 : 309 – 23 .
  • Pâquet , M.R. and Des Marchais , J.E. 1998 . Students' acceptance of peer assessment . Education for Health: Change in Training and Practice , 11 : 25 – 35 .
  • Pope , N.K.L. 2005 . The impact of stress in self‐ and peer assessment . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 30 : 51 – 63 .
  • Prins , F. , Sluijsmans , D. and Kirschner , P.A. 2006 . Feedback for general practitioners in training: Quality, styles, and preferences . Advances in Health Sciences Education , 11 : 289 – 303 .
  • Prins , F. , Sluijsmans , D. , Kirschner , P.A. and Strijbos , J.W. 2005 . Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: A case study . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 30 : 417 – 44 .
  • Purchase , H.C. 2000 . Learning about interface design through peer assessment . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 25 : 341 – 52 .
  • Rada , R. and Hu , K. 2002 . Patterns in student–student commenting . IEEE Transactions on Education , 45 : 262 – 7 .
  • Robinson , J.M. 2002 . In search of fairness: An application of multi‐reviewer anonymous peer review in a large class . Journal of Further and Higher Education , 26 : 183 – 92 .
  • Sadler , D.R. 1989 . Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems . Instructional Science , 18 : 119 – 44 .
  • Sadler , P. and Good , E. 2006 . The impact of self‐ and peer‐grading on student learning . Educational Assessment , 11 : 1 – 31 .
  • Saito , H. and Fujita , T. 2004 . Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms . Language Teaching Research , 8 : 31 – 54 .
  • Schelfhout , W. , Dochy , F. and Janssens , S. 2004 . The use of self, peer and teacher assessment as a feedback system in a learning environment aimed at fostering skills of cooperation in an entrepreneurial context . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 29 : 177 – 201 .
  • Searby , M. and Ewers , T. 1997 . An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: A case study in the School of Music, Kingston University . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 22 : 371 – 83 .
  • Segers , M. and Dochy , F. 2001 . New assessment forms in problem‐based learning: The value‐added of the students' perspective . Studies in Higher Education , 26 : 327 – 43 .
  • Sitthiworachart , J. and Joy , M. Deepening computer programming skills by using web‐based peer assessment . Paper presented at the proceedings of the 4th annual conference of the LTSN Centre for Information and Computer Sciences . August , Galway, Ireland.
  • Sivan , A. 2000 . The implementation of peer assessment: An action research approach . Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice , 7 : 193 – 213 .
  • Sluijsmans , D. 2002 . “ Student involvement in assessment: The training of peer assessment skills ” . Open Universiteit Nederland . PhD diss.
  • Sluijsmans , D. , Brand‐Gruwel , S. , van Merriënboer , J.J.G. and Bastiaens , T. 2002 . The training of peer assessment skills to promote the development of reflection skills in teacher education . Studies in Educational Evaluation , 29 : 23 – 42 .
  • Sluijsmans , D. and Prins , F. 2006 . A conceptual framework for integrating peer assessment in teacher education . Studies in Educational Evaluation , 32 : 6 – 22 .
  • Smith , H. , Cooper , A. and Lancaster , L. 2002 . Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case for student and staff development . Innovations in Education & Teaching International , 39 : 71 – 81 .
  • Somervell , H. 1993 . Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: The case for self‐, peer and collaborative assessment . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 18 : 221 – 33 .
  • Stefani , L.A.J. 1998 . Assessment in partnership with learners . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 23 : 339 – 50 .
  • Strachan , I.B. and Wilcox , S. 1996 . Peer and self assessment of group work: Developing an effective response to increased enrolment in a third‐year course in microclimatology . Journal of Geography in Higher Education , 20 : 343 – 53 .
  • Topping , K. 1998 . Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities . Review of Educational Research , 68 : 249 – 76 .
  • Topping , K.J. , Smith , E.F. , Swanson , I. and Elliot , A. 2000 . Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 25 : 149 – 69 .
  • Trahasch , S. Towards a flexible peer assessment system . Proceedings of the 5th international conference on information technology based higher education and training . Edited by: Akpýnar , Y. and Hagler , M. pp. 516 – 20 . Istanbul : Bođaziçi University .
  • van den Berg , I. , Admiraal , W. and Pilot , A. 2006a . Peer assessment in university teaching: Evaluating seven course designs . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 31 : 19 – 36 .
  • van den Berg , I. , Admiraal , W. and Pilot , A. 2006b . Designing student peer assessment in higher education: Analysis of written and oral peer feedback . Teaching in Higher Education , 11 : 135 – 47 .
  • Venables , A. and Summit , R. 2003 . Enhancing scientific essay writing using peer assessment . Innovations in Education & Teaching International , 40 : 281 – 90 .
  • Yorke , M. 2003 . Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice . Higher Education , 45 : 477 – 501 .
  • Zhang , S. 1995 . Re‐examining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class . Journal of Second Language Writing , 4 : 209 – 22 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.