589
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Do those who benefit the most need it the least? A four-year experiment in enquiry-based feedback

&
Pages 803-815 | Published online: 24 Aug 2012

References

  • Adcroft, A. 2009. “The motivations to study of undergraduate students in management: The impact of degree programme and level of study.” International Journal of Management Education 9(1): 11–20.
  • Adcroft, A. 2010. “Speaking the same language? Perceptions of feedback amongst academics and students in a school of law.” The Law Teacher: The International Journal of Legal Education 44(3): 250–266.
  • Adcroft, A. 2011a. “The mythology of feedback.” Higher Education Research and Development 30(4): 405–419.
  • Adcroft, A. 2011b. “The motivations to study and expectations of studying of undergraduate students in business and management.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 35(4): 521–543.
  • Barrow, M. 2006. “Assessment and student transformation: Linking character and intellect.” Studies in Higher Education 31(3): 357–372.
  • Bone, A. 1999. Ensuring successful assessment, national centre for legal education. Coventry: University of Warwick.
  • Brew, A. 2003. “Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education.” Higher Education Research and Development 22(1): 3–18.
  • Burke, D. 2009. “Strategies for using feedback students bring to higher education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 24(1): 41–50.
  • Carless, D. 2006. “Differing perceptions in the feedback process.” Studies in Higher Education 31(2): 219–233.
  • Crisp, B. R. 2007. “Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students’ subsequent submission of assessable work.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32(5): 571–581.
  • Dweck, C. S. 2006. Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
  • Edelson, D. C., D. N. Gordin, and R. D. Pea. 1999. “Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 8(3–4): 391–450.
  • Entwistle, N. 2003. Concepts and conceptual frameworks underpinning the ETL project, occasional report 3. Edinburgh: ETL Project.
  • Gibbs, G., and C. Simpson. 2005. “Conditions under which assessment supports student learning.” Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 1: 3–31.
  • Handley, K., M. Price and J. Millar 2009. Engaging students with assessment feedback. Oxford: FDTL5 Project Report, Higher Education Academy
  • Hodgson, J. and V. Bermingham 2004. Feedback on assessment: Can a better student experience of feedback be achieved by working smarter rather than harder? Brighton: UK Centre for Legal Education, Higher Education Academy
  • Holmes, K., and G. Papageorgiou. 2009. “‘Good, bad and insufficient’ students’ expectations, perceptions and uses of feedback.” Journal of Hospitality Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education 8(1): 85–96.
  • Hyatt, D. F. 2005. “‘Yes, a very good point!’ a critical genre analysis of a corpus of feedback commentaries on master of education assignments.” Teaching in Higher Education 10(3): 339–353.
  • Kahn, P., and K. O’Rourke. 2005. “Understanding enquiry based learning.” In Handbook of enquiry and problem based learning, edited by T. Barrett, I. Mac Labhrainn and H. Fallon, 1–12. Galway: CELT.
  • Miller, T. 2009. “Formative computer based assessment in higher education: The effectiveness of feedback in supporting student learning.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34(2): 181–192.
  • Nicol, D. J., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31(2): 199–218.
  • Orrell, J. 2006. “Feedback on learning achievement: Rhetoric and reality.” Teaching in Higher Education 11(4): 441–456.
  • Parikh, A., K. McReelis, and B. Hodges. 2001. “Student feedback in problem based learning: A survey of 103 final year students across five Ontario medical schools.” Medical Education 35: 632–636.
  • Vardi, I. 2009. “The relationship between feedback and change in tertiary student writing in the disciplines.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 44(4): 350–361.
  • Woolf, H. 2004. “Assessment criteria: Reflections on current practices.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29(4): 479–493.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.