Are the principles of effective feedback transferable across disciplines? A comparative study of written assignment feedback in Languages and Technology

References

• Anderson, J. R. 1976. Language, memory and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. 1989. “Practice, working memory, and the ACT∗ theory of skill acquisition: A comment on Carlson, Sullivan and Schneider.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 15: 527–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. 2000. Cognitive psychology and its implications. 5th ed. New York, NY: Worth.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. C. 1972. “Optimizing the learning of a second-language vocabulary.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 96: 123–129.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. C., and R. M. Shiffrin. 1968. “Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes.” In The psychology of learning and motivation, edited by K. W. Spence and J. T. Spence, 89–195. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and classroom learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5(1): 7–74.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., and L. Campbell. 2010. “Generating dialogue in assessment feedback: Exploring the use of interactive cover sheets.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35(3): 291–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, E., and C. Glover. 2006. “Evaluating written feedback.” In Innovative assessment in higher education, edited by C. Bryan and K. Clegg, 81–91. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, D. 2009. “Strategies for using feedback students bring to higher education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34(1): 41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2006. “Differing perceptions in the feedback process.” Studies in Higher Education 31(2): 219–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetwynd, F., and C. Dobbyn. 2011. “Assessment, feedback and marking guides in distance education.” Open Learning 26(1): 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 2000. “The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior.” Psychological Inquiry 11(4): 227–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, R., P. Hartley, and A. Skelton. 2002. “The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning.” Studies in Higher Education 27(1): 53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higher Education Funding Council for England. 2010. National Student Survey. Findings and trends 2006 to 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, F. 2003. “Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback.” System 31(2): 217–230.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M. R., and B. V. Street. 1998. “Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach.” Studies in Higher Education 23(2): 157–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunt, T., and J. Curran. 2010. “‘Are you listening please?’ The advantages of electronic audio feedback compared to written feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35(7): 759–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merry, S. and P., Orsmond 2008. Students’ attitudes to and usage of academic feedback provided via audio files. Bioscience Education. www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol11/beej-11-3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. 2009. “Assessment for learner self-regulation: Enhancing achievement in the first year using learning technologies.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34(3): 335–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. 2010. “From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35(5): 501–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., and S. Merry. 2011. “Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36(2): 125–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaprasad, A. 1983. “On the definition of feedback.” Behavioural Science 28: 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. 2000. “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25(1): 54–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 1989. “Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems.” Instructional Science 18: 119–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. 1992. “Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14: 57–85.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., and R. M. Shiffrin. 1977. “Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention.” Psychological Review 84(1): 1–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M., and W. Schneider. 1977. “Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.” Psychological Review 84(2): 127–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallerand, R. J., and G. Reid. 1984. “On the causal effects of perceived competence on intrinsic motivation: A test of cognitive evaluation theory.” Journal of Sport Psychology 6: 94–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, M. 2009. “An investigation into written comments on assignments: Do students find them usable?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31(1): 67–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar