Post-graduate student performance in ‘supervised in-class’ vs. ‘unsupervised online’ multiple choice tests: implications for cheating and test security

References

• Alexander, M., J. Bartlett, A. Truell, and K. Ouwenga. 2001. “Testing in a Computer Technology Course: An Investigation of Equivalency in Performance between Online and Paper and Pencil Methods.” Journal of Career and Technical Education 18 (1): 69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Anakwe, B. 2008. “Comparison of Student Performance in Paper-based versus Computer-based Testing.” Journal of Education for Business 84 (1): 13–17.10.3200/JOEB.84.1.13-17
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, A., C. Barton, and K. Mullen. (2014). The five faces of online education: What students and parents want. BCG Perspectives. Retrieved from http://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/education_consumer_insight_five_faces_online_education_what_students_parents_want/.
   Google Scholar
• Bugbee, Jr., A. 1996. “The Equivalence of Paper-and Pencil and Computer Based Testing.” The Journal of Research on Computing in Education 28: 282–290.
   Google Scholar
• Dille’, E. 2011. “A Multi-institutional Investigation into Cheating on Tests in College Online Courses.” Doctor of Philosophy, University of South Carolina, SC (UMI 3488362).
   Google Scholar
• Eplion, D., Keefe, T. 2005. “Best Practices for Preventing Cheating on On-line Exams.” Paper presented at the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, Chesapeake, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Erturk, I., Y. Ozden, and R. Sanli. 2004. “Students’ Perceptions of Online Assessment: A Case Study.” Journal of Distance Education 19: 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Fask, A., F. Englander, and Z. Wang. 2014. “Do Online Exams Facilitate Cheating? An Experiment Designed to Separate Possible Cheating from the Effect of the Online Test Taking Environment.” Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (2): 101–112.10.1007/s10805-014-9207-1
   Google Scholar
• Granger, M., and McGarry, N. 2003. “Incorporating On-line Testing into Face-to-face Traditional Information Systems Courses.” Paper presented at the International Academy for Information Management, Annual Conference, International Conference on Informatics Education and Research, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Grijalva, T., C. Nowell, and J. Kerkvliet. 2006. “Academic Honesty and Online Courses.” College Student Journal 40 (1): 180–185.
   Google Scholar
• Harkins, A., and G. Kubik. 2010. “‘Ethical’ Cheating in Formal Education.” On the Horizon 18 (2): 138–146.10.1108/10748121011050487
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, O., and J. Lambrinos. 2008. “Are Online Exams an Invitation to Cheat?” The Journal of Economic Education 39 (2): 116–125.10.3200/JECE.39.2.116-125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, M. 2006. “High Tech Cheating.” Nurse Education in Practice 6: 364–371.10.1016/j.nepr.2006.07.008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hensley, L. 2013. “To Cheat or Not to Cheat: A Review with Implications for Practice.” The Community College Enterprise 19 (2): 22–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hollister, K., and M. Berenson. 2009. “Proctored versus Unproctored Online Exams: Studying the Impact of Exam Environment on Student Performance.” Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 7 (1): 271–294.10.1111/dsji.2009.7.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Kibble, J. 2007. “Use of Unsupervised Online Quizzes as Formative Assessment in a Medical Physiology Course: Effects of Incentives on Student Participation and Performance.” AJP: Advances in Physiology Education 31: 253–260.10.1152/advan.00027.2007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolowich, S. 2013. Behind the Webcam’s Watchful Eye, Online Proctoring Takes Hold. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://chronicle.com/article/Behind-the-Webcams-Watchful/138505/.
   Google Scholar
• Ladyshewsky, R., and R. Taplin. 2013. “Factors Influencing Mode of Study Preferences in Post-graduate Business Students.” The International Journal of Management Education 11 (1): 34–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2012.12.001.10.1016/j.ijme.2012.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S. 2008. “Design and Use of Assessment Tasks in Online Graduate Courses: Instructors’ Practices, Reflections, and Perceptions.” Doctor of Philosophy, Indiana University, IN (UMI 3330791).
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, K., D. Smith, S. Brallier, and L. Palm. 2010. “Computer-based Testing: A Comparison of Computer-based and Paper-and-Pencil Assessment.” Academy of Educational Leadership Journal 14 (4): 117–125.
   Google Scholar
• Peled, Y., C. Barczyk, Y. Eshet, and K. Grinautski. 2012. “Learning Motivation and Student Academic Dishonesty – A Comparison between Face-to-face and Online Courses.” Paper presented at the Chais Conference on Instructional Technologies Research, Raanana, Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, Z. 2007. “Giving Online Quizzes in Corporate Finance and Investments for a Better Use of Seat Time.” The Journal of Educators Online 4 (2): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, R. 2012. “Proctored versus Non-proctored: How does Assessment Setting Affect Student Achievement on Web-based Assessments?” Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Denver, June.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, D., R. Fulton, and T. Garsombke. 2009. “Comparisons of Proctored versus Non-proctored Testing Strategies in Graduate Distance Education Curriculum.” Journal of College Teaching & Learning 7 (6): 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Rakes, G., V. Fields, and K. Cox. 2006. “The Influence of Teachers’ Technology Use on Instructional Practices.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 38 (4): 411–426.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, M., J. Schultz, and G. Round. 2008. “Online Non-proctored Testing and Its Affect on Final Course Grades.” The Business Review, Cambridge 9 (2): 11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Styron, J., and R. Styron. 2010. “Student Cheating and Alternative Web-based Assessment.” Journal of College Teaching 7 (5): 37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Trenholm, S. 2007. “A Review of Cheating in Fully Asynchronous Online Courses: A Math or Fact-based Course Perspective.” Journal of Educational Technology Systems 35 (3): 281–300.10.2190/Y78L-H21X-241N-7Q02
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, J. 2006. Digital Technologies and Dishonesty in Examinations and Tests, 1–24. Report of the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, UK. Accessed April 4, 2014. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/6987/1/qca-06_digital-technologies-dishonesty-exams-tests-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, G. 2005. “Comparing Learning Style to Performance in On-line Teaching: Impact of Proctored v. Un-proctored Testing.” Journal of Interactive Online Learning 4 (1): 20–39.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R., J. Lloyd, and D. Simonton. 1990. “Sources of OSCE Examination Information and Perceived Helpfulness: A Study of the Grapevine.” Paper presented at the Current Developments in Assessing Clinical Competence, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, R., and B. Beaudrie. 2009. “The Impact of Online Assessment on Grades in Community College Distance Education Mathematics Courses.” American Journal of Distance Education 23 (2): 62–70.10.1080/08923640902850601
   Google Scholar