14,537
Views
151
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Assessment rubrics: towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice

References

  • Andrade, H., and Y. Du. 2005. “Student Perspectives on Rubric-referenced Assessment.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 10 (3): 1–11.
  • Biggs, J., and C. Tang. 2007. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Boud, D., and R. Soler. 2015. “Sustainable Assessment Revisited.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.  Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133.
  • Dawson, P. 2014. “Beyond a Definition: Toward a Framework for Designing and Specifying Mentoring Models.” Educational Researcher 43 (3): 137–145. doi:10.3102/0013189x14528751.
  • Dimopoulos, I., O. Petropoulou, and S. Retalis. 2013. Assessing Students’ Performance Using the Learning Analytics Enriched Rubrics. Paper presented at the proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Leuven.
  • Dornisch, M. M., and A. S. McLoughlin. 2006. “Limitations of Web-based Rubric Resources: Addressing the Challenges.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 11 (3): 1–8.
  • Fluckiger, J. 2010. “Single Point Rubric: A Tool for Responsible Student Self-assessment.” Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin 76 (4): 18–25.
  • Google Books Ngram Viewer. 2015. “Google Ngram Viewer.” Accessed April 28, 2015. https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=assessment+rubric&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cassessment.rubric%3B%2Cc0
  • Google Images. 2015. “Assessment Rubric – Google Search.” Accessed April 28, 2015. https://www.google.com.au/search?q=assessment+rubric&espv=2&biw=1280&bih=1255&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAWoVChMI__mRkJKMxwIVxWGmCh010ARN
  • Google Scholar. 2015. “Assessment Rubric – Google Scholar.” Accessed April 28, 2015. https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?q="assessment+rubric"
  • Hafner, J., and P. Hafner. 2003. “Quantitative Analysis of the Rubric as an Assessment Tool: An Empirical Study of Student Peer-group Rating.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (12): 1509–1528. doi:10.1080/0950069022000038268.
  • IMS Global Learning Consortium. 2005. “IMS Rubric Specification.” Version 1.0 Final Specification. Accessed June 2, 2005. http://www.imsglobal.org/ep/epv1p0/imsrubric_specv1p0.html
  • Johnson, R. L., J. Penny, and B. Gordon. 2000. “The Relation between Score Resolution Methods and Interrater Reliability: An Empirical Study of an Analytic Scoring Rubric.” Applied Measurement in Education 13 (2): 121–138. doi:10.1207/S15324818AME1302_1.
  • Jonsson, A., and G. Svingby. 2007. “The Use of Scoring Rubrics: Reliability, Validity and Educational Consequences.” Educational Research Review 2 (2): 130–144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002.
  • Lewis, S. J., and K. W. Heaton. 1997. “Stool Form Scale as a Useful Guide to Intestinal Transit Time.” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 32 (9): 920–924. doi:10.3109/00365529709011203.
  • Macfarlane, B. 2011. “The Morphing of Academic Practice: Unbundling and the Rise of the Para-academic.” Higher Education Quarterly 65 (1): 59–73. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00467.x.
  • Magno, C. 2012. “Assessing Higher Education Teachers through Peer Assistance and Review.” The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment 9 (2): 104–120.
  • Makel, M. C., and J. A. Plucker. 2014. “Facts are more Important than Novelty: Replication in the Education Sciences.” Educational Researcher 43 (6): 304–316. doi:10.3102/0013189x14545513.
  • Nordrum, L., K. Evans, and M. Gustafsson. 2013. “Comparing Student Learning Experiences of In-text Commentary and Rubric-articulated Feedback: Strategies for Formative Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (8): 919–940. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.758229.
  • Panadero, E., and M. Romero. 2014. “To Rubric or not to Rubric? The Effects of Self-assessment on Self-regulation, Performance and Self-efficacy.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 21 (2): 133–148. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872.
  • Pawson, R. 2006. Evidence-based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: Sage.
  • Popham, W. J. 1997. What’s Wrong – and What’s Right – with Rubrics. Educational Leadership 55 (2): 72–75.
  • Reddy, Y. M., and H. Andrade. 2010. “A Review of Rubric Use in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (4): 435–448. doi:10.1080/02602930902862859.
  • Sadler, D. R. 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714.
  • Sadler, D. R. 2009a. “Indeterminacy in the Use of Preset Criteria for Assessment and Grading.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2): 159–179. doi:10.1080/02602930801956059.
  • Sadler, D. R. 2009b. “Transforming Holistic Assessment and Grading into a Vehicle for Complex Learning.” In Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education, edited by G. Joughin, 1–19. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-8905-3
  • Sandelowski, M., C. I. Voils, J. Leeman, and J. L. Crandell. 2012. “Mapping the Mixed Methods-mixed Research Synthesis Terrain.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 6 (4): 317–331. doi:10.1177/1558689811427913.
  • Tierney, R., and M. Simon. 2004. “What’s Still Wrong with Rubrics: Focusing on the Consistency of Performance Criteria across Scale Levels.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 9 (2): 1–10.
  • Timmerman, B. E. C., D. C. Strickland, R. L. Johnson, and J. R. Payne. 2010. “Development of a ‘Universal’ Rubric for Assessing Undergraduates’ Scientific Reasoning Skills Using Scientific Writing.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (5): 509–547. doi:10.1080/02602930903540991.
  • Torrance, H. 2007. “Assessment as Learning? How the Use of Explicit Learning Objectives, Assessment Criteria and Feedback in Post-secondary Education and Training can come to Dominate Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 14 (3): 281–294. doi:10.1080/09695940701591867.
  • Wenzlaff, T. L., J. J. Fager, and M. J. Coleman. 1999. “What is a Rubric? Do Practitioners and the Literature Agree?” Contemporary Education 70 (4): 41–46.
  • Wong, G., G. Westhorp, R. Pawson, and T. Greenhalgh. 2013. “Realist Synthesis: RAMESES Training Materials.” Accessed January 26, 2015. http://www.ramesesproject.org/index.php?pr=Project_outputs

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.