Assessment rubrics: towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice

References

• Andrade, H., and Y. Du. 2005. “Student Perspectives on Rubric-referenced Assessment.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 10 (3): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., and C. Tang. 2007. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and R. Soler. 2015. “Sustainable Assessment Revisited.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.  Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, P. 2014. “Beyond a Definition: Toward a Framework for Designing and Specifying Mentoring Models.” Educational Researcher 43 (3): 137–145. doi:10.3102/0013189x14528751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimopoulos, I., O. Petropoulou, and S. Retalis. 2013. Assessing Students’ Performance Using the Learning Analytics Enriched Rubrics. Paper presented at the proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Dornisch, M. M., and A. S. McLoughlin. 2006. “Limitations of Web-based Rubric Resources: Addressing the Challenges.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 11 (3): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Fluckiger, J. 2010. “Single Point Rubric: A Tool for Responsible Student Self-assessment.” Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin 76 (4): 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Google Books Ngram Viewer. 2015. “Google Ngram Viewer.” Accessed April 28, 2015. https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=assessment+rubric&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cassessment.rubric%3B%2Cc0
   Google Scholar
• Google Images. 2015. “Assessment Rubric – Google Search.” Accessed April 28, 2015. https://www.google.com.au/search?q=assessment+rubric&espv=2&biw=1280&bih=1255&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAWoVChMI__mRkJKMxwIVxWGmCh010ARN
   Google Scholar
• Google Scholar. 2015. “Assessment Rubric – Google Scholar.” Accessed April 28, 2015. https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?q="assessment+rubric"
   Google Scholar
• Hafner, J., and P. Hafner. 2003. “Quantitative Analysis of the Rubric as an Assessment Tool: An Empirical Study of Student Peer-group Rating.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (12): 1509–1528. doi:10.1080/0950069022000038268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMS Global Learning Consortium. 2005. “IMS Rubric Specification.” Version 1.0 Final Specification. Accessed June 2, 2005. http://www.imsglobal.org/ep/epv1p0/imsrubric_specv1p0.html
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. L., J. Penny, and B. Gordon. 2000. “The Relation between Score Resolution Methods and Interrater Reliability: An Empirical Study of an Analytic Scoring Rubric.” Applied Measurement in Education 13 (2): 121–138. doi:10.1207/S15324818AME1302_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A., and G. Svingby. 2007. “The Use of Scoring Rubrics: Reliability, Validity and Educational Consequences.” Educational Research Review 2 (2): 130–144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. J., and K. W. Heaton. 1997. “Stool Form Scale as a Useful Guide to Intestinal Transit Time.” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 32 (9): 920–924. doi:10.3109/00365529709011203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B. 2011. “The Morphing of Academic Practice: Unbundling and the Rise of the Para-academic.” Higher Education Quarterly 65 (1): 59–73. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00467.x.
   Google Scholar
• Magno, C. 2012. “Assessing Higher Education Teachers through Peer Assistance and Review.” The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment 9 (2): 104–120.
   Google Scholar
• Makel, M. C., and J. A. Plucker. 2014. “Facts are more Important than Novelty: Replication in the Education Sciences.” Educational Researcher 43 (6): 304–316. doi:10.3102/0013189x14545513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordrum, L., K. Evans, and M. Gustafsson. 2013. “Comparing Student Learning Experiences of In-text Commentary and Rubric-articulated Feedback: Strategies for Formative Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (8): 919–940. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.758229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., and M. Romero. 2014. “To Rubric or not to Rubric? The Effects of Self-assessment on Self-regulation, Performance and Self-efficacy.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 21 (2): 133–148. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. 2006. Evidence-based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. 1997. What’s Wrong – and What’s Right – with Rubrics. Educational Leadership 55 (2): 72–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, Y. M., and H. Andrade. 2010. “A Review of Rubric Use in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (4): 435–448. doi:10.1080/02602930902862859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2009a. “Indeterminacy in the Use of Preset Criteria for Assessment and Grading.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2): 159–179. doi:10.1080/02602930801956059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2009b. “Transforming Holistic Assessment and Grading into a Vehicle for Complex Learning.” In Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education, edited by G. Joughin, 1–19. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-8905-3
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., C. I. Voils, J. Leeman, and J. L. Crandell. 2012. “Mapping the Mixed Methods-mixed Research Synthesis Terrain.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 6 (4): 317–331. doi:10.1177/1558689811427913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, R., and M. Simon. 2004. “What’s Still Wrong with Rubrics: Focusing on the Consistency of Performance Criteria across Scale Levels.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 9 (2): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Timmerman, B. E. C., D. C. Strickland, R. L. Johnson, and J. R. Payne. 2010. “Development of a ‘Universal’ Rubric for Assessing Undergraduates’ Scientific Reasoning Skills Using Scientific Writing.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (5): 509–547. doi:10.1080/02602930903540991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. 2007. “Assessment as Learning? How the Use of Explicit Learning Objectives, Assessment Criteria and Feedback in Post-secondary Education and Training can come to Dominate Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 14 (3): 281–294. doi:10.1080/09695940701591867.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzlaff, T. L., J. J. Fager, and M. J. Coleman. 1999. “What is a Rubric? Do Practitioners and the Literature Agree?” Contemporary Education 70 (4): 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, G., G. Westhorp, R. Pawson, and T. Greenhalgh. 2013. “Realist Synthesis: RAMESES Training Materials.” Accessed January 26, 2015. http://www.ramesesproject.org/index.php?pr=Project_outputs
   Google Scholar