Assessment for learning: a catalyst for student self-regulation

References

• Ackroyd, S., and J. Hughes. 1992. Data Collection in Context. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy. The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. 2015. “Formative Assessment – An Optimistic but Incomplete Vision.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 22 (1): 161–177. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.999643.10.1080/0969594X.2014.999643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., and R. McCormick. 2010. “Reflections and New Directions.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 493–499. doi:10.1080/02602938.2010.493696.10.1080/02602938.2010.493696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 5 (1): 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D., and P. Winne. 1995. “Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis.” Review of Educational Research 65 (3): 245–281. doi:10.3102/00346543065003245.10.3102/00346543065003245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2007. “Learning-Oriented Assessment: Conceptual Bases and Practical Implications.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 44 (1): 57–66. doi:10.1080/14703290601081332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2013. “Trust and Its Role in Facilitating Dialogic Feedback.” In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education, edited by D. Boud and E. Molloy, 90–103. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2015. Excellence in University Assessment. Learning from Award Winning Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, K., and C. MacArthur. 2010. “Student Revision with Peer and Expert Reviewing.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 328–338. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, I. 2012. “Formative Assessment: Assessment is for Self-Regulated Learning.” Educational Psychology Review 24 (2): 205–249. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6.10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covington, M. V. 1984. “The Self-Worth Theory of Achievement Motivation: Findings and Implications.” The Elementary School Journal 85 (1): 4–20. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1001615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. 1986. “Motivational Processes Affecting Learning.” American Psychologist 41: 1040–1048. http://www.nisdtx.org/cms/lib/TX21000351/Centricity/Domain/21/j%20carlisle/Motivational%20Processes.pdf.10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezzy, D. 2002. Qualitative Analysis. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 2005. Improving Assessment through Student Involvement. London: Routledge-Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawe, E., and J. Parr. 2014. “Assessment for Learning in the Writing Classroom: An Incomplete Realization.” The Curriculum Journal 25 (2): 201–237. doi:10.1080/09585176.2013.862172.
   Google Scholar
• Hendry, G., and J. Anderson. 2013. “Helping Students Understand the Standards of Work Expected in an Essay: Using Exemplars in Mathematics Pre-Service Education Classes.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 754–768. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.703998.10.1080/02602938.2012.703998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, G. H., N. Bromberger, and S. Armstrong. 2011. “Constructive Guidance and Feedback for Learning: The Usefulness of Exemplars, Marking Sheets and Different Types of Feedback in a First Year Law Subject.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1080/02602930903128904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, M., and D. Pedder. 2006. “Professional Learning as a Condition for Assessment for Learning.” In Assessment and Learning, edited by J. Gardner, 27–43. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., and F. Johnson. 2013. Joining Tougher: Group Theory and Group Skills. 11th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Klenowski, V. 2009. “Assessment for Learning Revisited: An Asia-Pacific Perspective.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 16 (3): 277–282. doi:10.1080/09695940903319646.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, B. 2004. “Goals or Horizons – The Conundrum of Progression in English: Or a Possible Way of Understanding Formative Assessment in English.” Curriculum Journal 15 (2): 101–113. doi:10.1080/0958517042000226784.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. 2013. “Resituating Feedback from the Reactive to the Proactive.” In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education, edited by D. Boud and E. Molloy, 34–49. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, J., and B. Crossouard. 2008. “A Socio-Cultural Theorisation of Formative Assessment.” Oxford Review of Education 34 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/03054980701476386.10.1080/03054980701476386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2009a. “Grade Integrity and the Representation of Academic Achievement.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (7): 807–826. doi:10.1080/03075070802706553.10.1080/03075070802706553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2009b. “Transforming Holistic Assessment and Grading into a Vehicle for Complex Learning.” In Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education, edited by G. Joughin, 45–63. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. 1995. “Self-Efficacy and Education and Instruction.” In Self-Efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment: Theory, Research, and Application, edited by J. E. Maddux, 281–303. New York: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4419-6868-5
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Swaffield, S. 2011. “Getting to the Heart of Authentic Assessment for Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 18 (4): 433–449. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2011.582838.10.1080/0969594X.2011.582838
   Google Scholar
• To, J., and D. Carless. 2015. “Making Productive Use of Exemplars: Peer Discussion and Teacher Guidance for Positive Transfer of Strategies.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 40 (6): 746–764. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2015.1014317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. 2011. “What is Assessment for Learning?” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37 (1): 3–14. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 2008. “Goal Setting: A Key Proactive Source of Academic Self-Regulation.” In Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research and Applications, edited by D. H. Schunk and B. J. Zimmerman, 267–295. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., and A. Kitsantas. 1999. “Acquiring Writing Revision Skill: Shifting from Process to Outcome Self-Regulatory Goals.” Journal of Educational Psychology 91 (2): 241–250.10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar