Student attitudes that predict participation in peer assessment

References

• Berg, E. C. 1999. “The Effects of Trained Peer Response on ESL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality.” Journal of Second Language Writing 8 (3): 215–241.10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80115-5
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., S. E. Irving, E. R. Peterson, and G. H. F. Hirschfeld. 2009. “Use of Interactive–Informal Assessment Practices: New Zealand Secondary Students’ Conceptions of Assessment.” Learning and Instruction 19 (2): 97–111.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., and P. Knight. 1994. Assessing Learners in Higher Education. London: Kogan.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Kun-Hung, H. T. Hou, and S. Y. Wu. 2014. “Exploring Students’ Emotional Responses and Participation in an Online Peer Assessment Activity: A Case Study.” Interactive Learning Environments 22 (3): 271–287.10.1080/10494820.2011.649766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, W., and M. Warren. 2005. “Peer Assessment of Language Proficiency.” Language Testing 22 (1): 93–121.10.1191/0265532205lt298oa
   Google Scholar
• Cho, K., and C. D. Schunn. 2007. “Scaffolded Writing and Rewriting in the Discipline: A Web-based Reciprocal Peer Review System.” Computers & Education 48 (3): 409–426.10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, K., C. D. Schunn, and R. W. Wilson. 2006. “Validity and Reliability of Scaffolded Peer Assessment of Writing from Instructor and Student Perspectives.” Journal of Educational Psychology 98 (4): 891–901.10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K. 1988. “Educational Technology and School Organization.” In Technology in Education: Looking toward 2020, edited by R. S. Nickerson and P. P. Zodhiates, 231–264. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Collimore, L., D. E. Paré, and S. Joordens. 2015. “SWDYT: So What Do You Think? Canadian Students’ Attitudes about PeerScholar, an Online Peer-Assessment Tool.” Learning Environments Research 18 (1): 33–45.10.1007/s10984-014-9170-1
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C. 1999. “Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 350–383.10.2307/2666999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., and W. Kintsch. 1995. “Long-Term Working Memory.” Psychological Review 102: 211–245.10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. C., and W. E. Lambert. 1972. Attitudes and Motivation: Second Language Learning. New York: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Gatfield, T. 1999. “Examining Student Satisfaction with Group Projects and Peer Assessment.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 24 (4): 365–377.
   Google Scholar
• Gehringer, E. F. 2010. “Expertiza: Managing Feedback in Collaborative Learning.” In Monitoring and Assessment in Online Collaborative Environments: Emergent Computational Technologies for E-Learning Support, edited by A. A. Juan, T. Daradoumis, F. Xhafa, S. Caballe, and J. Faulin, 75–96. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-60566-786-7
   Google Scholar
• Gu, Z. W. 2007. “An Analysis of Chinese Non-English Majors’ English Learning Beliefs.” Foreign Languages Education 28 (5): 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Jhangiani, R. S. 2016. “The Impact of Participating in a Peer Assessment Activity on Subsequent Academic Performance.” Teaching of Psychology 43 (3): 180–186.10.1177/0098628316649312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. H., and C. D. Schunn. 2011. “Students Perceptions about Peer Assessment for Writing: Their Origin and Impact on Revision Work.” Instructional Science 39 (3): 387–406.10.1007/s11251-010-9133-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., C. Weidman, and K. M. Hammond. 1987. “Introduction and Integration of Classroom Routines by Expert Teachers.” Curriculum Inquiry 17 (2): 135–176.10.1080/03626784.1987.11075284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Y. Xiong, X. Zang, M. L. Kornhaber, Y. Lyu, K. S. Chung, and H. K. Suen. 2016. “Peer Assessment in the Digital Age: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Ratings.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (2): 245–264.10.1080/02602938.2014.999746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S. S., E. Z. F. Liu, and S. M. Yuan. 2002. “Student Attitude toward Networked Peer Assessment: Case Studies of Undergraduate Students and Senior High School Students.” International Journal of Instructional Media 29 (2): 241.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, N. F., and D. Carless. 2006. “Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3): 279–290.10.1080/13562510600680582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, E. Z. F., and S. M. Yuan. 2003. “A Study of Students’ Attitudes toward and Desired System Requirement of Networked Peer Assessment System.” International Journal of Instructional Media 30 (4): 349–354.
   Google Scholar
• McGarr, O., and A. M. Clifford. 2013. “‘Just Enough to Make You Take It Seriously’: Exploring Students’ Attitudes towards Peer Assessment.” Higher Education 65 (6): 677–693.10.1007/s10734-012-9570-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, L. M. 1988. Contradictions of Control: School Structure and School Knowledge. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nulty, D. D. 2008. “The Adequacy of Response Rates to Online and Paper Surveys: What Can Be Done?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (3): 301–314.10.1080/02602930701293231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patchan, M. M., C. D. Schunn, and R. J. Clark. 2011. “Writing in Natural Sciences: Understanding the Effects of Different Types of Reviewers on the Writing.” Journal of Writing Research 2 (3): 365–393.10.17239/jowr-2011.02.03.4
   Google Scholar
• Patchan, M. M., C. D. Schunn, and R. J. Correnti. 2016. “The Nature of Feedback: How Peer Feedback Features Affect Students’ Implementation Rate and Quality of Revisions.” Journal of Educational Psychology 108 (8): 1098–1120.10.1037/edu0000103
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, T. M. 1999. “The Effect of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Student Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 8 (3): 265–289.10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80117-9
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. 1999. “The Role of Motivation in Promoting and Sustaining Self-Regulated Learning.” International Journal of Educational Research 31 (6): 459–470.10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4
   Google Scholar
• Planas Lladó, A., L. F. Soley, R. M. F. Sansbelló, G. A. Pujolras, J. P. Planella, N. Roura-Pascual, J. J. Suñol Martínez, and L. M. Moreno. 2014. “Student Perceptions of Peer Assessment: An Interdisciplinary Study.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (5): 592–610.10.1080/02602938.2013.860077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Praver, M., G. Rouault, and J. Eidswick. 2011. “Attitudes and Affect toward Peer Evaluation in EFL Reading Circles.” The Reading Matrix 11 (2): 89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, J. M. 1993. Teaching ESL Writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
   Google Scholar
• Roskams, T. 1999. “Chinese Efl Students’ Attitudes to Peer Feedback and Peer Assessment in an Extended Pairwork Setting.” RELC Journal 30 (1): 79–123.10.1177/003368829903000105
   Google Scholar
• Russell, A. A. 2004. “Calibrated Peer Review – A Writing and Critical-Thinking Instructional Tool.” In Teaching Tips: Innovations in Undergraduate Science Instruction, edited by M. Druger, E. D. Siebert, and L. W. Crow, 54–55. Arlington: National Science Teachers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sasmaz Oren, Fatma 2012. “The Effects of Gender and Previous Experience on the Approach of Self and Peer Assessment: A Case from Turkey.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49 (2): 123–133.10.1080/14703297.2012.677598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunn, C. D. 2016. “Writing to Learn and Learning to Write through SWoRD.” In Adaptive Educational Technologies for Literacy Instruction, edited by S. A. Crossley and D. S. McNamara, 244–259. New York: Taylor & Francis, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schunn, C. D., A. Godley, and S. DeMartino. 2016. “The Reliability and Validity of Peer Review of Writing in High School AP English Classes.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 60 (1): 13–23.10.1002/jaal.525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeda, S., and F. Homberg. 2014. “The Effects of Gender on Group Work Process and Achievement: An Analysis through Self- and Peer-Assessment.” British Educational Research Journal 40 (2): 373–396.10.1002/berj.3088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, W. L. 2012. “Study and Analysis on Chinese Non-English Major College Students’ Demotivation in English Learning.” Foreign Language Education 33 (1): 70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. 1998. “Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities.” Review of Educational Research 68 (3): 249–276.10.3102/00346543068003249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., P. Fisser, N. Pareja Roblin, J. Tondeur, and J. van Braak. 2013. “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge – A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 29 (2): 109–121.10.1111/jcal.2013.29.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Y. Liang, L. Liu, and Y. Liu. 2016. “A Multi-peer Assessment Platform for Programming Language Learning: Considering Group Non-Consensus and Personal Radicalness.” Interactive Learning Environments 24 (8): 2011–2031.10.1080/10494820.2015.1073748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., A. Xuan, and Y. J. Chen. 2006. “Analysis and Investigation of Chinese Non-English Majors’ English Writing Instruction.” Foreign Language World 115 (5): 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Warrington, M., M. Younger, and J. Williams. 2000. “Student Attitudes, Image and the Gender Gap.” British Educational Research Journal 26 (3): 393–407.10.1080/01411920050030914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe, Y., and M. Swain. 2007. “Effects of Proficiency Differences and Patterns of Pair Interaction on Second Language Learning: Collaborative Dialogue between Adult ESL Learners.” Language Teaching Research 11 (2): 121–142.10.1177/136216880607074599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, M. L., and C. C. Tsai. 2006. “University Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes toward (Online) Peer Assessment.” Higher Education 51: 27–44.10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, M. L., C. C. Tsai, and C. Y. Chang. 2006. “Attitude towards Peer Assessment: A Comparison of the Perspectives of Pre-Service and in-Service Teachers.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 43 (1): 83–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L. 2014. “Examining the Mediational Means in Collaborative Writing: Case Studies of Undergraduate ESL Students in Business Courses.” Journal of Second Language Writing 23: 74–89.10.1016/j.jslw.2014.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., and I. Lee. 2015. “Understanding EFL Students’ Participation in Group Peer Feedback of L2 Writing: A Case Study from an Activity Theory Perspective.” Language Teaching Research 19 (5): 572–593.10.1177/1362168814541714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar