Good and bad practices in rubrics: the perspectives of students and educators

References

• Arieli-Attali, M., and Y. Liu. 2016. “Beyond Correctness: Development and Validation of Concept- Based Categorical Scoring Rubrics for Diagnostic Purposes.” Educational Psychology 36 (6): 1083–1101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, D., and S. L. Lim. 2013. “Improving Assessment Processes in Higher Education: Student and Teacher Perceptions of the Effectiveness of a Rubric Embedded in a LMS.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 29 (5): 651–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, A. 2016. “Student-Generated Scoring Rubrics: Examining Their Formative Value for Improving ESL Students’ Writing Performance.” Assessing Writing 29: 15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A., R. Mladenovic, and M. Price. 2013. “Students’ Perceptions of the Usefulness of Marking Guides, Grade Descriptors and Annotated Exemplars.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (7): 769–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., B. den-Outer, J. Hudson, and M. Price. 2016. “Let’s Stop the Pretence of Consistent Marking: Exploring the Multiple Limitations of Assessment Criteria.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (3): 466–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M., and F. Chen. 2015. “The Quality and Effectiveness of Descriptive Rubrics.” Educational Review 67 (3): 343–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. 2018. “Appropriate Criteria: Key to Effective Rubrics.” Frontiers in Education 3 (22): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D., S. M. Bridges, C. K. Y. Chan, and R. Glofcheski. 2017. Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education (Enabling Power of Assessment v. 5). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and C. N. Poth. 2018. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, P. 2017. “Assessment Rubrics: Towards Clearer and More Replicable Design, Research and Practice.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (3): 347–360. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, P., and J. Adams. 2017. “Values in Evaluation – The Use of Rubrics.” Evaluation and Program Planning 65: 113–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennison, R. D., A. Dempsey, and J. Rosselli. 2014. Evaluation Beyond Exams in Nursing Education: Designing Assignments and Evaluating with Rubrics. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dennison, R., J. Rosselli, and A. Dempsey. 2015. Evaluation Beyond Exams in Nursing Education: Designing Assignments and Evaluating with Rubrics. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Diederich, P. B., J. W. French, and S. T. Carlton. 1961. Factors in Judgments of writing ability. Retrieved on 26 March 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1961.tb00286.x
   Google Scholar
• Gezie, A., K. Khaja, V. N. Chang, M. E. Adamek, and M. B. Johnsen. 2012. “Rubrics as a Tool for Learning and Assessment: What Do Baccalaureate Students Think?” Journal of Teaching in Social Work 32 (4): 421–437.
   Google Scholar
• Haack, S., A. Fornoff, F. Caligiuri, E. Dy-Boarman, M. Bottenberg, W. Mobley-Bukstein, G. Bryant, and A. Bryant. 2017. “Comparison of Electronic versus Paper Rubrics to Assess Patient Counseling Experiences in a Skills-Based Lab Course.” Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 9 (6): 1117–1122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hack, C. 2015. “Analytical Rubrics in Higher Education: A Repository of Empirical Data.” British Journal of Educational Technology 46 (5): 924–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, G., V. Meier, and J. Trace. 2015. “Building a Better Rubric: Mixed Methods Rubric Revision.” Assessing Writing 26: 51–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley, J. 2013. Introducing Research and Evidence-based Practice for Nursing and Healthcare Professionals. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A. 2014. “Rubrics as a Way of Providing Transparency in Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (7): 840–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kite, J., and P. Phongsavan. 2017. “Evaluating Standards-Based Assessment Rubrics in a Postgraduate Public Health Subject.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (6): 837–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., and P. Lindsey. 2015. “Understanding Variations between Student and Teacher Application of Rubrics.” Assessing Writing 26: 67–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, K. S. R. 2018. “How Program Evaluators Use and Learn to Use Rubrics to Make Evaluative Reasoning Explicit.” Evaluation and Program Planning 69: 25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menéndez-Varela, J., and E. Gregori-Giralt. 2016. “The Contribution of Rubrics to the Validity of Performance Assessment: A Study of the Conservation-Restoration and Design Undergraduate Degrees.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (2): 228–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oermann, M. H., and K. B. Gaberson. 2017. Evaluation and Testing in Nursing Education. 5th ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, M. J. 2018. The Science of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., and M. Romero. 2014. “To Rubric or Not to Rubric? The Effects of Self-Assessment on Self-regulation, Performance and Self-Efficacy.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 21 (2): 133–148.
   Google Scholar
• Prins, F. J., R. de Kleijn, and J. van Tartwijk. 2017. “Students' Use of a Rubric for Research Theses.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (1): 128–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, A. R. 2011. Where Great Teaching Begins: Planning for Student Thinking and Learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaei, A. R., and M. Lovorn. 2010. “Reliability and Validity of Rubrics for Assessment through Writing.” Assessing Writing: An International Journal 15 (1): 18–39.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2010. “Beyond Feedback: Developing Student Capability in Complex Appraisal.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 535–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2012. “Assessment, Evaluation and Quality Assurance: Implications for Integrity in Reporting Academic Achievement in Higher Education.” Education Inquiry 3 (2): 201–216.
   Google Scholar
• Selke, M. J. G. 2013. Rubric Assessment Goes to College: Objective, Comprehensive Evaluation of Student Work. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, D. D., and A. J. Levi. 2013. Introduction to Rubrics: An Assessment Tool to Save Grading Time, Convey Effective Feedback, and Promote Student Learning. 2nd ed. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, A., and C. Lindberg. 2010. “Objective.” New Oxford American Dictionary: Oxford University Press. Retrieved 21 June 2018, from http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195392883.001.0001/m_en_us1272644.
   Google Scholar
• Sundeen, T. 2014. “Instructional Rubrics: Effects of Presentation Options on Writing Quality.” Assessing Writing 21: 74–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillema, H., M. Leenknecht, and M. Segers. 2011. “Assessing Assessment Quality: Criteria for Quality Assurance in Design of (Peer) Assessment for Learning – A Review of Research Studies.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37 (1): 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. 2015. “Standardization.” A Dictionary of Education: Oxford University Press. Retrieved 21 Jun. 2018, from http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199679393.001.0001/acref-9780199679393-e-958.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W. 2017. “Using Rubrics in Student Self-Assessment: Student Perceptions in the English as a Foreign Language Writing Context.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (8): 1280–1292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K. A., and E. T. Heitzler. 2018. “Effect of Increased Evaluation Objectivity on Grade Inflation: precise Grading Rubrics and Rigorously Developed Tests.” Nurse Educator 43 (2): 73–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, M. E. 2017. “Global Standards and Outcomes of a Legal Education: How Rubrics Can Help to Deliver Objectivity, Transparency, Verifiability and Consistency.” The Law Teacher 51 (3): 287–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar