Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis

References

• Berg, E. C. 1999. “The Effects of Trained Peer Response on ESL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality.” Journal of Second Language Writing 8(3):215–241. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80115-5.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D., T. Nekrasova, and B. Horn. 2011. The Effectiveness of Feedback for L1-English and L2 Writing Development: A Meta-Analysis. TOEFL iBT Research Report No. TOEFLiBT-14. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02241.x.
   Google Scholar
• Birjandi, P., and M. Siyyari. 2010. “Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment: A Comparative Study of Their Effect on Writing Performance and Rating Accuracy.” Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics 13(1):23–45.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., and A. West. 2004. “Understanding the Rules of the Game: Making Peer Assessment as a Medium for Developing Students’ Conceptions of Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29(6):721–733. doi:10.1080/0260293042000227254.
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., L. Hedges, J. Higgins, and H. Rothstein. 2009. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-C., K.-H. Tseng, P.-N. Chou, and Y.-H. Chen. 2011. “Reliability and Validity of Web-Based Portfolio Peer Assessment: A Case Study for a Senior High School’s Students Taking Computer Course.” Computers & Education 57(1):1306–1316. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T. 2016. “Technology-Supported Peer Feedback in ESL/EFL Writing Classes: A Research Synthesis.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 29(2):365–397. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.960942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, W., and M. Warren. 1999. “Peer and Teacher Assessment of the Oral and Written Tasks of a Group Project.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 23(3):301–314. doi:10.1080/0260293990240304.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, K., and C. D. Schunn. 2007. “Scaffolded Writing and Rewriting in the Discipline: A Web-Based Reciprocal Peer Review System.” Computers and Education 48(3):409–426. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, K., C. D. Schunn, and R. W. Wilson. 2006. “Validity and Reliability of Scaffolded Peer Assessment of Writing from Instructor and Student Perspectives.” Journal of Educational Psychology 98(4):891–901. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., and L. McDowell. 1997. “Assessment as a Tool for Learning.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 23(4):279–298. doi:10.1016/S0191-491X(97)86211-6.
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., M. Segers, and D. Sluijsmans. 1999. “The Use of Self-, Peer and co-Assessment in Higher Education: A Review.” Studies in Higher Education 24(3):331–350. doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., and D. Boud. 1989. “Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 59(4):395–430. doi:10.2307/1170205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, Z., and E. Tipton. 2014. Robumeta: Robust Variance Meta-Regression. Available at: http://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/robumeta/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Gielen, S., F. Dochy, and P. Onghena. 2011. “An Inventory of Peer Assessment Diversity.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36(2):137–155. doi:10.1080/02602930903221444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., M. Hebert, and K. R. Harris. 2015. “Formative Assessment and Writing: A Meta-Analysis.” The Elementary School Journal 115(4):523–547. doi:10.1086/681947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, K., J. O’Hara, and G. McNamara. 2015. “Re-Thinking Assessment: Self- and Peer-Assessment as Drivers of Self-Direction in Learning.” Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 60:75–88. doi:10.14689/ejer.2015.60.5.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V. 1981. “Distribution Theory for Glass’s Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators.” Journal of Educational Statistics 6(2):107–128. doi:10.3102/10769986006002107.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., E. Tipton, and M. C. Johnson. 2010. “Robust Variance Estimation in Meta‐Regression with Dependent Effect Size Estimates.” Research Synthesis Methods 1(1):39–65. doi:10.1002/jrsm.5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, C. 2010. “Assessment for Learning in Science: What Works?” Primary Science 115:14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kalaian, H. A., and S. W. Raudenbush. 1996. “A Multivariate Mixed Linear Model for Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Methods 1(3):227–235. doi:10.1037//1082-989X.1.3.227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, J. S., and E. E. Lawler. 1978. “Methods of Peer Assessment.” Psychological Bulletin 85(3):555–586. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.85.3.555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., and J. Ryu. 2013. “The Development and Implementation of a Web-Based Formative Peer Assessment System for Enhancing Students’ Metacognitive Awareness and Performance in Ill-Structured Tasks.” Educational Technology Research and Development 61(4):549–561. doi:10.1007/s11423-012-9266-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Y. Xiong, X. Zang, M. Kornhaber, Y. Lyu, K. Chung, and H. K. Suen. 2016. “Peer Assessment in a Digital Age: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Ratings.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41(2):245–264. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.999746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., X. Liu, and A. L. Steckelberg. 2010. “Assessor or Assessee: How Student Learning Improves by Giving and Receiving Peer Feedback.” British Journal of Educational Technology 41(3):525–536. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, N.-F., and D. Carless. 2006. “Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 11(3):279–290. doi:10.1080/13562510600680582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. J. 2003. “The Effect of Scoring Criteria Specificity on Peer and Self-Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28(4):383–394. doi:10.1080/0260293032000066218.
   Google Scholar
• Patchan, M. M., C. D. Schunn, and R. J. Clark. 2018. “Accountability in Peer Assessment: Examining the Effects of Reviewing Grades on Peer Ratings and Peer Feedback.” Studies in Higher Education 43(12):2263–2278. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1320374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patchan, M. M., C. D. Schunn, and R. Correnti. 2016. “The Nature of Feedback: How Feedback Features Affected Students’ Implementation Rate and Quality of Revisions.” Journal of Educational Psychology 108(8):1098–1120. doi:10.1037/edu0000103.
   Google Scholar
• Perera, J., G. Mohamadou, and S. Kaur. 2010. “The Use of Objective Structured Self-Assessment and Peer-Feedback (OSSP) for Learning Communication Skills: Evaluation Using a Controlled Trial.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 15(2):185–193. doi:10.1007/s10459-009-9191-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pond, K., R. Ui-Haq, and W. Wade. 1995. “Peer Review: A Precursor to Peer Assessment.” Innovations in Education & Training International 32(4):314–323. doi:10.1080/1355800950320403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, K., and A. Z. Khonbi. 2015. “Iranian University Students’ Experiences of and Attitudes Towards Alternatives in Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40(5):641–665. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.941324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, P. M., and E. Good. 2006. “The Impact of Self- and Peer-Grading on Student Learning.” Educational Assessment 11(1):1–31. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, C. E., K. M. Atkinson, A. C. Koenka, H. Moshontz, and H. Cooper. 2017. “Self-Grading and Peer-Grading for Formative and Summative Assessments in 3rd through 12th Grade Classrooms: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Educational Psychology 109(8):1049–1066. doi:10.1037/edu0000190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scammacca, N., G. Roberts, and K. K. Stuebing. 2014. “Meta-Analysis with Complex Research Designs: Dealing with Dependence from Multiple Measures and Multiple Group Comparisons.” Review of Educational Research 84(3):328–364. doi:10.3102/0034654313500826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebba, J., R. D. Crick, G. Yu, H. Lawson, W. Harlen, and K. Durant. 2008. “Systematic Review of Research Evidence of the Impact on Students in Secondary Schools of Self and Peer Assessment. Technical Report.” In Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., and J. E. Hunter. 2015. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Errors and Bias in Research Findings. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D. M. A., S. Brand-Gruwel, J. J. G. van Merriënboer, and T. J. Bastiaens. 2002. “The Training of Peer Assessment Skills to Promote the Development of Reflection Skills in Teacher Education.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 29(1):23–42. doi:10.1016/S0191-491X(03)90003-4.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 1998. “Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities.” Review of Educational Research 68(3):249–276. doi:10.3102/00346543068003249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 2003. Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility. In Optimizing New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards, edited by M. S. R. Segers, F. J. R. C. Dochy, & E. C. Cascallar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 2017. “Peer Assessment: Learning by Judging and Discussing the Work of Other Learners.” Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology 1(1):7.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J., and S. W. Ehly. 2001. “Peer Assisted Learning: A Framework for Consultation.” Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation 12(2):113–132. doi:10.1207/S1532768XJEPC1202_03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Noortgate, W., and P. Onghena. 2003. “Multilevel Meta-Analysis: A Comparison with Traditional Meta-Analytical Procedures.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 63(5):765–790. doi:10.1177/0013164403251027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gennip, N. A. E., M. S. R. Segers, and H. H. Tillema. 2009. “Peer Assessment for Learning from a Social Perspective: The Influence of Interpersonal Variables and Structural Features.” Educational Research Review 4(1):41–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zundert, M., D. Sluijsmans, and J. van Merrienboer. 2010. “Effective Peer Assessment Processes: Research Findings and Future Directions.” Learning and Instruction 20(4):270–279. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer, W. 2010. “Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the Metafor Package.” Journal of Statistical Software 36(3):1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villamil, O. S., and M. C. M. Guerrero. 1996. “Peer Revision in the L2 Classroom: Social-Cognitive Activities, Mediating Strategies, and Aspects of Social Behavior.” Journal of Second Language Writing 5(1):51–75. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90015-6.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, L. M., and C.-C. Tsai. 2008. “Online Peer Assessment in an in Service Science and Mathematics Teacher Education Course.” Teaching in Higher Education 13(1):55–67. doi:10.1080/13562510701794050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooley, R. S., C. A. Was, C. D. Schunn, and D. W. Dalton. 2008. The effects of feedback elaboration on the giver of feedback. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar