Assessment hurdles in core first year courses in Australian universities: Are we trying to catch out students?

References

• Alauddin, M., & Khan, A. (2010). Does performance in progressive assessment influence the outcome in final examination? An Australian experience. Educational Assessment, Evaluation & Accountability, 22, 293–305. doi:10.1007/s11092-010-9103-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, R., & Best, R. (2009). The use of assessment hurdles: Pedagogy versus practicality. Paper presented at the 34th Australasian Universities Building Educators Conference, Barossa Valley, South Australia. Accessed 11 May 2018 from http://epublications.bond.edu.au/sustainable_development/23.
   Google Scholar
• Birmingham, S. (2015). Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015. (F2015L01639). Canberra, Australia: Australian Government, Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. & Associates. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Retrieved from Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, P., Cooper, A., Evanson, P., Haines, C., Jenkins, D., Scurry, D., … Yorke, M. (2002). Coursework marks high, examination marks low: Discuss. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(1), 35–48. doi:10.1080/02602930120105045.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill, D., Myers, P., & Robinson, L. (2010). Education quality and ‘exam hurdles’: A flawed relationship. Paper presented at the ATN Assessment Conference 2010 University of Technology, Sydney. Accessed 11 May 2018 from https://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/cahill.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cordiner, M., & Kift, S. (2008). Briefing paper on first year assessment: Resource developed for Professor Sally Kift’s Australian Learning and Teaching Council Senior Fellowship 'Articulating a transition pedagogy to scaffold and to enhance the first year student experience in Australian higher education'. http://transitionpedagogy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ALTCKiftAssessmentBriefingPaperforDesktop_15Dec09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• James, L. T., & Casidy, R. (2018). Authentic assessment in business education: its effects on student satisfaction and promoting behaviour. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 401–415. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1165659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, J. P., Peters, B. J., Greenwood, E. J., & Altose, A. J. (2016). Reappraising Stress Arousal Improves Performance and Reduces Evaluation Anxiety in Classroom Exam Situations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(6), 579–587. doi:10.1177/1948550616644656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, T., & Maleckar, B. (2016). The influence of disciplinary assessment patterns on student learning: a comparative study. Studies in Higher Education, 41(4), 696–711. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.943170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, K. L., & Coates, H. (2008). Students’ engagement in first‐year university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493–505. doi:10.1080/02602930701698892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynam, S. & Cachia, M. (2018) Students’ perceptions of the role of assessments at higher education, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 223–234. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1329928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, B. (2015). Assuring Graduate Capabilities: Evidencing levels of achievement for graduate employability. Retrieved from Sydney, Australia: http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-assuring-graduate-capabilities-evidencing-levels-achievement-graduate-employability-2015
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. (2015). Coursework versus examinations in end-of-module assessment: a literature review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(3), 439–455. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.919628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, S., Slade, C., Wong, K.-S., & Whiting, B. (2018). ‘Just turn to us’: the persuasive features of contract cheating websites. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(4), 652–665. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1391948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. (1986). ROSBA Discussion Paper 4. Defining Achievement Levels. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11343/115859
   Google Scholar
• Scott, G., Coates, H., & Anderson, M. (2008). Learning Leaders in Times of Change: Academic Leadership Capabilities for Australian Higher Education. Retrieved from Sydney: http://www.altc.edu.au/carrick/webdav/site/carricksite/users/siteadmin/public/grants_leadership_uws_acer_finalreport_june08.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shulruf, B., Poole, P., Jones, P., & Wilkinson, T. (2015). The objective borderline method: A probabilistic method for standard setting. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(3), 420–438. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.918088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suleman, F. (2018). The employability skills of higher education graduates: insights into conceptual frameworks and methodological options. Higher Education, 76(2), 263–278. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0207-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J., & Briggs, G. (2018). To see or not to see? Comparing the effectiveness of examinations and end of module assessments in online distance learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tweed, M. (2010). Passing assessment should not just be jumping hurdles. Focus on Health Professional Education, 11(3), 85–89.
   Google Scholar
• Yousuf, N., Violato, C., & Zuberi, R. W. (2015). Standard setting methods for pass/fail decisions on high-stakes objective structured clinical examinations: A validity study. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 27(3), 280–291. doi:10.1080/10401334.2015.1044749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar