1,443
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How conceptualising respect can inform feedback pedagogies

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Ajjawi, R., and D. Boud. 2018. “Examining the Nature and Effects of Feedback Dialogue.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (7): 1106–1119. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1434128.
  • Ajjawi, R., G. Regehr. 2019. “When I Say… Feedback.” Medical Education 53 (7): 652–654. doi:10.1111/medu.13746.
  • Astin, A. W. 1999. “Student Involvement: A Developmental Theory for Higher Education.” Journal of College Student Development 40 (5): 518–529.
  • Barnett, R., and K. Coate. 2005. Engaging the Curriculum in Higher Education. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
  • Bearman, M., and R. Ajjawi. 2019. “Can a Rubric Do More than Be Transparent? Invitation as a New Metaphor for Assessment Criteria.” Studies in Higher Education : 1–10. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1637842.
  • Bloxham, S., and L. Campbell. 2010. “Generating Dialogue in Assessment Feedback: Exploring the Use of Interactive Cover Sheets.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 291–300. doi:10.1080/02602931003650045.
  • Boud, D., and E. Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
  • Brookhart, S. 2016. “Section Discussion: Building Assessments That Work in Classrooms.” In Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment, edited by Gavin T. L. Brown and Lois R. Harris, 351–365. New York and London: Routledge.
  • Brown, G., H. L. Andrade, and F. Chen. 2015. “Accuracy in Student Self-Assessment: Directions and Cautions for Research.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 22 (4): 444–457. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.996523.
  • Carless, D. 2013. “Trust and Its Role in Facilitating Dialogic Feedback.” In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education, edited by D. Boud and E. Molloy, 100–113. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Carless, D., and D. Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1315–1325. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
  • Carless, D., and J. Zhou. 2016. “Starting Small in Assessment Change: Short in-Class Written Responses.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (7): 1114–1127. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1068272.
  • Cookson, C. 2017. “Voices from the East and West: Congruence on the Primary Purpose of Tutor Feedback in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (7): 1168–1179. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1236184.
  • Cowie, B., and C. Harrison. 2016. “Classroom Processes That Support Effective Assessment.” In Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment, edited by Gavin T. L. Brown and Lois R. Harris, 335–350. New York and London: Routledge.
  • Crommelinck, M., and F. Anseel. 2013. “Understanding and Encouraging Feedback‐Seeking Behaviour: A Literature Review.” Medical Education 47 (3): 232–241. doi:10.1111/medu.12075.
  • Darwall, S. L. 1977. “Two Kinds of Respect.” Ethics 88 (1): 36–49. doi:10.1086/292054.
  • Dawson, P. 2017. “Assessment Rubrics: Towards Clearer and More Replicable Design, Research and Practice.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (3): 347–360. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294.
  • Dawson, P., M. Henderson, P. Mahoney, M. Phillips, T. Ryan, D. Boud, and E. Molloy. 2019. “What Makes for Effective Feedback: Staff and Student Perspectives.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (1): 25–36. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877.
  • Dillon, R. S. 1992. “Respect and Care: Toward Moral Integration.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 22 (1): 105–131. doi:10.1080/00455091.1992.10717273.
  • Dillon, R. S. 2018. “Respect.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/respect/.
  • Durning, S. J., D. P. Sklar, E. W. Driessen, and L. A. Maggio. 2019. “This Manuscript Was a Complete Waste of Time”: Reviewer Etiquette Matters.” Academic Medicine 94 (6): 744–745. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002697.
  • Feinberg, J. 1973. “Some Conjectures on the Concept of Respect.” Journal of Social Philosophy 4 (2): 1–3. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.1973.tb00163.x.
  • Fong, C. J., D. L. Schallert, K. M. Williams, Z. H. Williamson, J. R. Warner, S. Lin, and Y. W. Kim. 2018. “When Feedback Signals Failure but Offers Hope for Improvement: A Process Model of Constructive Criticism.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 30: 42–53. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.014.
  • Forsythe, A., and S. Johnson. 2017. “Thanks, but No-Thanks for the Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (6): 850–859. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1202190.
  • Gravett, K., I. M. Kinchin, N. E. Winstone, K. Balloo, M. Heron, A. Hosein, S. Lygo-Baker, and E. Medland. 2019. “The Development of Academics’ Feedback Literacy: Experiences of Learning from Critical Feedback via Scholarly Peer Review.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education : 1–15.
  • Han, Y., and F. Hyland. 2019. “Academic Emotions in Written Corrective Feedback Situations.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 38: 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.003.
  • Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
  • Hudson, S. D. 1980. “The Nature of Respect.” Social Theory and Practice 6 (1): 69–90. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract19806112.
  • Krogh, K.,. M. Bearman, and D. Nestel. 2016. “Thinking on Your Feet’—a Qualitative Study of Debriefing Practice.” Advances in Simulation 1 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1186/s41077-016-0011-4.
  • Kuh, G., T. Cruce, R. Shoup, J. Kinzie, and R. Gonyea. 2008. “Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence.” The Journal of Higher Education 79 (5): 540–563. doi:10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116.
  • Molloy, E., D. Boud, and M. Henderson. 2019. “Developing a Learning-Centred Framework for Feedback Literacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education : 1–14.
  • Moon, T. R. 2016. “Differentiated Instruction and Assessment.” In Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment, edited by Gavin T. L. Brown and Lois R. Harris, 284–301. New York and London: Routledge.
  • Murdock, T. B., J. M. Stephens, and M. M. Grotewiel. 2016. “Student Dishonesty in the Face of Assessment.” In Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment, edited by Gavin T. L. Brown and Lois R. Harris, 186–203. New York and London: Routledge.
  • Nash, R. A., N. E. Winstone, S. E. A. Gregory, and E. Papps. 2018. “A Memory Advantage for past-Oriented over Future-Oriented Performance Feedback.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 44 (12): 1864–1879. doi:10.1037/xlm0000549.
  • O’Donovan, B. M., B. den Outer, M. Price, and A. Lloyd. 2019. “What Makes Good Feedback Good?” Studies in Higher Education : 1–12. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1630812.
  • Panadero, E. 2016. “Is It Safe? Social, Interpersonal, and Human Effects of Peer Assessment: A Review and Future Directions.” In Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment, edited by Gavin Brown and Lorris Harris, 247–266. New York: Routledge.
  • Pitt, E., and L. Norton. 2017. “Now That’s the Feedback I Want!’ Students’ Reactions to Feedback on Graded Work and What They Do with It.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (4): 499–516. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1142500.
  • Price, M., K. Handley, and J. Millar. 2011. “Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (8): 879–896. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.483513.
  • Reusser, K., and C. Pauli. 2015. “Co-Constructivism in Educational Theory and Practice.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by James D. Wright, 913–917. Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Rowe, A. 2011. “The Personal Dimension in Teaching: Why Students Value Feedback.” International Journal of Educational Management 25 (4): 343–360. doi:10.1108/09513541111136630.
  • Rudolph, J. W., D. B. Raemer, and R. Simon. 2014. “Establishing a Safe Container for Learning in Simulation: The Role of the Presimulation Briefing.” Simulation in Healthcare: Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare 9 (6): 339–349. doi:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000047.
  • Ryan, T., and M. Henderson. 2018. “Feeling Feedback: Students’ Emotional Responses to Educator Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (6): 880–892. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1416456.
  • Sutton, P. 2012. “Conceptualizing Feedback Literacy: Knowing, Being, and Acting.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49 (1): 31–40. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.647781.
  • Tai, J., R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, P. Dawson, and E. Panadero. 2018. “Developing Evaluative Judgement: Enabling Students to Make Decisions about the Quality of Work.” Higher Education 76 (3): 467–481. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3.
  • van Gennip, N. A. E., M. S. R. Segers, and H. H. Tillema. 2009. “Peer Assessment for Learning from a Social Perspective: The Influence of Interpersonal Variables and Structural Features.” Educational Research Review 4 (1): 41–54. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002.
  • Värlander, S. 2008. “The Role of Students’ Emotions in Formal Feedback Situations.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (2): 145–156. doi:10.1080/13562510801923195.
  • Wilson, M. J., M. M. Diao, and L. Huang. 2015. “I’m Not Here to Learn How to Mark Someone Else’s Stuff’: An Investigation of an Online Peer-to-Peer Review Workshop Tool.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40 (1): 15–32. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.881980.
  • Winstone, N. E., R. A. Nash, J. Rowntree, and M. Parker. 2017. “It’d Be Useful, but I Wouldn’t Use It’: Barriers to University Students’ Feedback Seeking and Recipience.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (11): 2026–2041. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032.
  • Xu, Y., and D. Carless. 2017. “Only True Friends Could Be Cruelly Honest’: Cognitive Scaffolding and Social-Affective Support in Teacher Feedback Literacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (7): 1082–1094. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1226759.
  • Yu, S., and G. Hu. 2017. “Can Higher-Proficiency L2 Learners Benefit from Working with Lower-Proficiency Partners in Peer Feedback?” Teaching in Higher Education 22 (2): 178–192. doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1221806.
  • Zhao, K., J. Zhang, and X. Du. 2017. “Chinese Business Students’ Changes in Beliefs and Strategy Use in a Constructively Aligned PBL Course.” Teaching in Higher Education 22 (7): 785–804. doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1301908.
  • Zhou, J., and C. C. Deneen. 2016. “Chinese Award-Winning Tutors’ Perceptions and Practices of Classroom-Based Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (8): 1144–1158. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1066306.
  • Zhou, J., Y. Zheng, and J. H. M. Tai. 2019. “Grudges and Gratitude: The Social-Affective Impacts of Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education : 1–14. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1643449.
  • Zhu, Q., and D. Carless. 2018. “Dialogue within Peer Feedback Processes: Clarification and Negotiation of Meaning.” Higher Education Research & Development 37 (4): 883–897. doi:10.1080/07294360.2018.1446417.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.