Examiners’ use of rubric criteria for grading bachelor theses

References

• Adnan, K., and O. Bulut. 2014. “Crossed Random-Effect Modeling: Examining the Effects of Teacher Experience and Rubric Use in Performance Assessments.” Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 14 (57): 1–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.57.4.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H., and Y. Du. 2005. “Student Perspectives on Rubric-Referenced Assessment.” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 10 (3): 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.7275/g367-ye94
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., P. Boyd, and S. Orr. 2011. “Mark my Words: The Role of Assessment Criteria in UK Higher Education Grading Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (6): 655–670. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003777716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke, S., and A. P. Holbrook. 2013. “Examining PhD and Research Masters Theses.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (4): 407–416. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.638738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Kleijn, R. A. M., M. T. Mainhard, P. C. Meijer, A. Pilot, and M. Brekelmans. 2012. “Master’s Thesis Supervision: Relations between Perceptions of the Supervisor-Student Relationship, Final Grade, Perceived Supervisor Contribution to Learning and Student Satisfaction.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (8): 925–939. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.556717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, A., and B. D. Ripley. 2016. gdendro: Create dendrograms and tree diagrams using “ggplot2” (0.1-20). https://github.com/andrie/ggdendro
   Google Scholar
• Goulden, N. R., and C. J. G. Griffin. 1995. “The Meaning of Grades Based on Faculty and Student Metaphors.” Communication Education 44 (2): 110–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529509379003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, P., L. Adie, and K. Weir. 2016. “Quality Assurance of Assessment and Moderation Discourses Involving Sessional Staff.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (4): 548–559. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1030333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grömping, U. 2006. “Relative Importance for Linear Regression in R: The Package Relaimpo.” Journal of Statistical Software 17 (1): 1–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v017.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapborg, I., and C. Berterö. 2002. “Critiquing Bachelor Candidates' Theses: Are the Criteria Useful?” International Nursing Review 49 (2): 122–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-7657.2002.00123.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiley, M., and G. Mullins. 2004. “Examining the Examiners: How Inexperienced Examiners Approach the Assessment of Research Theses.” International Journal of Educational Research 41 (2): 121–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2005.04.009.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, S. M., M. Halvarsson, and B. Robertsson. 2008. “Quality Assessment and Comparison of Grading between Examiners and Supervisors of Bachelor Theses in Nursing Education.” Nurse Education Today 28 (1): 24–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2007.02.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., J. Alonso-Tapia, and E. Reche. 2013. “Rubrics vs. Self-Assessment Scripts Effect on Self-Regulation, Performance and Self-Efficacy in Pre-Service Teachers.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 39 (3): 125–132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, T. L. 2019. patchwork: The composer of plots (R-package version 1.0.0). https://cran.r-project.org/package=patchwork
   Google Scholar
• Prins, F. J., R. de Kleijn, and J. van Tartwijk. 2017. “Students’ Use of a Rubric for Research Theses.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (1): 128–150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1085954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, Y. M., and H. Andrade. 2010. “A Review of Rubric Use in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (4): 435–448. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. 2019. psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality Research (R package version 1.9.12). https://cran.r-project.org/package=psych
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2009. “Indeterminacy in the Use of Preset Criteria for Assessment and Grading.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2): 159–179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801956059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, J., R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, P. Dawson, and E. Panadero. 2018. “Developing Evaluative Judgement: Enabling Students to Make Decisions about the Quality of Work.” Higher Education 76 (3): 467–481. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmerman, B. E., D. C. Strickland, R. L. Johnson, and J. R. Payne. 2011. “Development of a ‘Universal’ Rubric for Assessing Undergraduates’ Scientific Reasoning Skills Using Scientific Writing.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (5): 509–547. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903540991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten, C. P. M., L. W. T. Schuwirth, E. W. Driessen, J. Dijkstra, D. Tigelaar, L. K. J. Baartman, and J. van Tartwijk. 2012. “A Model for Programmatic Assessment Fit for Purpose.” Medical Teacher 34 (3): 205–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.652239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnes, G. R., B. Bolker, L. Bonebakker, R. Gentleman, W. Huber, A. Liaw, T. Lumley, et al. 2019. gplots: Various R programming tools for plotting data (3.0.3). https://github.com/talgalili/gplots
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/978-3-319-24277-4.
   Google Scholar
• Wilke, C. O. 2019. cowplot: Streamlined plot theme and plot annotations for ggplot2. https://github.com/wilkelab/cowplot
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L., and S. Kemp. 2019. “Independent Markers of Master’s Theses Show Low Levels of Agreement.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (5): 764–771. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1535052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar