Student course evaluation documents: constituting evaluation practice

References

• Alderman, Lyn, Stephen Towers, and Sylvia Bannah. 2012. “Student Feedback Systems in Higher Education: A Focused Literature Review and Environmental Scan.” Quality in Higher Education 18 (3): 261–280. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2012.730714.
   Google Scholar
• Alkin, Marvin C., and Sandy M. Taut. 2002. “Unbundling Evaluation Use.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 29 (1): 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(03)90001-0.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Gina. 2006. “Assuring Quality/Resisting Quality Assurance: Academics’ Responses to ‘Quality’ in Some Australian Universities.” Quality in Higher Education 12 (2): 161–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320600916767.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, Paul, and Amanda J. Coffey. 2011. “Analysing Documentary Realities.” In Qualitative Research, 77–92. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Beran, Tanya, Claudio Violato, Don Kline, and Jim Frideres. 2005. “The Utility of Student Ratings of Instruction for Students, Faculty, and Administrators: A “Consequential Validity" Study.” Canadian Journal of Higher Education 35 (2): 49–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v35i2.183500.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, Gert. 2016. Good Education in an Age of Measurement: Ethics, Politics, Democracy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Borch, Iris. 2020. “Lost in Translation: From the University’s Quality Assurance System to Student Evaluation Practice.” Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy 6 (3): 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1818447.
   Google Scholar
• Borch, Iris, Ragnhild Sandvoll, and Torsten Risør. 2020. “Discrepancies in Purposes of Student Course Evaluations: What Does It Mean to Be “Satisfied”?” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 32 (1): 83–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09315-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, Glenn A. 2009. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9 (2): 27–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, Sónia, Maria J. Rosa, and Bjørn Stensaker. 2016. “Why is Quality in Higher Education Not Achieved? The View of Academics.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (6): 950–965. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1052775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooren, François. 2004. “Textual Agency: How Texts Do Things in Organizational Settings.” Organization 11 (3): 373–393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404041998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen, Peter. 2011. The Evaluation Society. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Danø, Trine, and Bjørn Stensaker. 2007. “Still Balancing Improvement and Accountability? Developments in External Quality Assurance in the Nordic Countries 1996–2006.” Quality in Higher Education 13 (1): 81–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320701272839.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, Stephen. 2016. Student Evaluation in Higher Education: Reconceptualising the Student Voice. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dicker, Ronald, Michael Garcia, Alison Kelly, and Hilda Mulrooney. 2019. “What Does ‘Quality’in Higher Education Mean? Perceptions of Staff, Students and Employers.” Studies in Higher Education 44 (8): 1425–1441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1445987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elassy, Noha. 2015. “The Concepts of Quality, Quality Assurance and Quality Enhancement.” Quality Assurance in Education 23 (3): 250–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-11-2012-0046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ese, Jo. 2019. “Defending the University?: Academics’ reactions to managerialism in Norwegian higher education.” Ph.D., Karlstads universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Froestad, Wenche, and Jon Haakstad 2009. Å rapportere kvalitet: en studie av rapporter til styret om utdanningskvalitet og kvalitetsarbeid for årene 2005, 2006 og 2007 i 18 institusjoner. Oslo: NOKUT.
   Google Scholar
• Højlund, Steven. 2014. “Evaluation Use in the Organizational Context–Changing Focus to Improve Theory.” Evaluation 20 (1): 26–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389013516053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Kelli, Lija O. Greenseid, Stacie A. Toal, Jean A. King, Frances Lawrenz, and Boris Volkov. 2009. “Research on Evaluation Use: A Review of the Empirical Literature from 1986 to 2005.” American Journal of Evaluation 30 (3): 377–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214009341660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, David, Doris Y. P. Leung, and K. P. Kwan. 2002. “Does the Use of Student Feedback Questionnaires Improve the Overall Quality of Teaching?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (5): 411–425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000009294.
   Google Scholar
• Kis, Viktoria. 2005. “Quality Assurance in Tertiary Education: Current Practices in OECD Countries and a Literature Review on Potential Effects.” Tertiary Review: A Contribution to the OECD Thematic Review of Tertiary Education 14 (9): 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Lovdata 2005. “Lov om universiteter og høyskoler [Act relating to Universities and University Colleges Section 1-6].” In Lovdata.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, Niels Windfeld. 2009. “Document Theory.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 43 (1): 1–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2009.1440430116.
   Google Scholar
• Neby, Simon. 2018. “Rapportering som organisatorisk aktivitet, paradokser i offentlige organisasjoner.” In Rapporten sjanger og styringsverktøy, edited by Kristian Bjørkdahl, 288–305. Oslo: Pax forlag A/S.
   Google Scholar
• Nevo, David. 1998. “Dialogue Evaluation: A Possible Contribution of Evaluation to School Improvement.” Prospects 28 (1): 77–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02737781.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, Jethro. 2000. “Feeding the Beast or Improving Quality? Academics’ Perceptions of Quality Assurance and Quality Monitoring.” Quality in Higher Education 6 (2): 153–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/713692740.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, Jethro. 2002. “Views from below: Academics Coping with Quality.” Quality in Higher Education 8 (1): 39–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320220127434.
   Google Scholar
• NOKUT. 2003. Kriterier for evaluering av universiteters og høgskolers kvalitetssikringssystem for utdanningsvirksomheten, vedtatt 5.mai 2003. Oslo: NOKUT (Nasjonalt organ for kvalitet i utdanningen).
   Google Scholar
• Patton, Michael Quinn. 1997. Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, Michael Quinn. 2008. Utilization-Focused Evaluation. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, Lindsay. 2003. Using Documents in Social Research, Introducing Qualitative Methods. London: London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, Lindsay. 2008. “Repositioning Documents in Social Research.” Sociology 42 (5): 821–836. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094564.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, John T. E. 2005. “Instruments for Obtaining Student Feedback: A Review of the Literature.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (4): 387–415. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500099193.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, Mark N. K., and Christines Williams. 2005. “From Evaluation towards an Agenda for Quality Improvement: The Development and Application of the Template Process.” Active Learning in Higher Education 6 (1): 60–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787405049944.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, Murray. 2011. “Setting the Scene: The Four Domains of Evaluative Practice in Higher Education.” In Reconceptualizing Evaluation in Higher Education: The Practice Turn, edited by Murray Saunders, Paul Trowler and Roni Bamber, 1–17. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education: ProQuest Ebook Central.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, Sarah J., Dorothy Spiller, Stuart Terry, Trudy Harris, Lynley Deaker, and Jo Kennedy. 2013. “Tertiary Teachers and Student Evaluations: Never the Twain Shall Meet?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (7): 892–904. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.767876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UiT. 2012. Kvalitetssystem for utdanningsvirksomheten ved Universitetet i Tromsø [Quality Assurance System UiT]. Tromsø: Universitetet i Tromsø.
   Google Scholar
• UiT. 2014. Rapportering av utdanningskvalitet for studieåret 2014, Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet. Tromsø: UiT Norges arktiske universitet.
   Google Scholar
• UiTø. 2010. Prosedyre for evaluering og system for eksterne evalueringer. Tromsø: Universitetet i Tromsø, Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet.
   Google Scholar
• Vedung, Evert. 2017. Public Policy and Program Evaluation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Westerheijden, Don F., Veerle Hulpiau, and Kim Waeytens. 2007. “From Design and Implementation to Impact of Quality Assurance: An Overview of Some Studies into What Impacts Improvement.” Tertiary Education and Management 13 (4): 295–312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880701535430.
   Google Scholar
• Westerheijden, Don F., Bjorn Stensaker, and Maria João Rosa. 2007. Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Trends in Regulation, Translation and Transformation. Vol. 20. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Youker, Brandon. 2018. “Internal Evaluation.” In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation, edited by Bruce B. Frey, 857–859. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar