References
- Adachi, C., J. Hong-Meng Tai, and P. Dawson. 2018. “Academics’ Perceptions of the Benefits and Challenges of Self and Peer Assessment in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (2): 294–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1339775.
- Arter, J., and J. McTighe. 2001. Scoring Rubrics in the Classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press Inc.
- Birjandi, P., and M. Siyyari. 2010. “Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment: A Comparative Study of Their Effect on Writing Performance and Rating Accuracy.” Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 13, 23–45.
- Cook, T. D., D. T. Campbell, and A. Day. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings, Volume 351. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
- Davis, D. A., P. E. Mazmanian, M. Fordis, R. Van Harrison, K. E. Thorpe, and L. Perrier. 2006. “Accuracy of Physician Self-Assessment Compared with Observed Measures of Competence: A Systematic Review.” JAMA 296 (9): 1094–1102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.9.1094.
- Divjak, B., and M. Maretic. 2017. “Learning Analytics for Peer-Assessment: (Dis)Advantages, Reliability and Implementation.” Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences 41 (1): 21–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.31341/jios.41.1.2.
- Double, K. S., J. A. McGrane, and T. N. Hopfenbeck. 2020. “The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Control Group Studies.” Educational Psychology Review, 32, 481–509.
- Evans, A., R. Leeson, and A. Petrie. 2007. “Reliability of Peer and Self-Assessment Scores Compared with Trainers’ Scores following Third Molar Surgery.” Medical Education 41 (9): 866–872. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02819.x.
- Falchikov, N., and J. Goldfinch. 2000. “Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks.” Review of Educational Research 70 (3): 287–322. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003287.
- Gielen, S., F. Dochy, and P. Onghena. 2011. “An Inventory of Peer Assessment Diversity.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (2): 137–155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903221444.
- Kampenes, V. B., T. Dybå, J. E. Hannay, and D. I. Sjøberg. 2007. “A Systematic Review of Effect Size in Software Engineering Experiments.” Information and Software Technology 49 (11–12): 1073–1086. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.015.
- Könings, K. D., M. van Zundert, and J. J. van Merriënboer. 2019. “Scaffolding Peer-Assessment Skills: Risk of Interference with Learning Domain-Specific Skills?” Learning and Instruction 60: 85–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.11.007.
- Lew, M. D., W. Alwis, and H. G. Schmidt. 2010. “Accuracy of Students’ Self-Assessment and Their Beliefs about Its Utility.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (2): 135–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930802687737.
- Liu, N.-F., and D. Carless. 2006. “Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3): 279–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582.
- Liu, J., X. Guo, R. Gao, P. Fram, Y. Ling, H. Zhang, and J. Wang. 2019. “Students’ Learning Outcomes and Peer Rating Accuracy in Compulsory and Voluntary Online Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (6): 835–847. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1542659.
- Li, H., Y. Xiong, C. V. Hunter, X. Guo, and R. Tywoniw. 2020. “Does Peer Assessment Promote Student Learning? a Meta-Analysis.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (2): 193–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679.
- Li, H., Y. Xiong, X. Zang, M. L. Kornhaber, Y. Lyu, K. S. Chung, and H. K. Suen. 2016. “Peer Assessment in the Digital Age: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Ratings.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (2): 245–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.999746.
- Mandala, M., C. Schunn, S. Dow, M. Goldberg, J. Pearlman, W. Clark, and I. Mena. 2018. “Impact of Collaborative Team Peer Review on the Quality of Feedback in Engineering Design Projects.” International Journal of Engineering Education 34 (4): 1299–1313.
- Mazur, E., and R. C. Hilborn. 1997. “Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual.” Physics Today 50 (4): 68–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881735
- Moskal, B. M. 2000. “Scoring Rubrics: What, When and How?” Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation 7, Article 3.
- Nicol, D., A. Thomson, and C. Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518.
- Panadero, E., J. Fraile, J. Fernández Ruiz, D. Castilla-Estévez, and M. A. Ruiz. 2019. “Spanish University Assessment Practices: Examination Tradition with Diversity by Faculty.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (3): 379–397. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1512553.
- Panadero, E., and A. Jonsson. 2020. “A Critical Review of the Arguments against the Use of Rubrics.” Educational Research Review 30: 100329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100329.
- Panadero, E., M. Romero, and J.-W. Strijbos. 2013. “The Impact of a Rubric and Friendship on Peer Assessment: Effects on Construct Validity, Performance, and Perceptions of Fairness and Comfort.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 39 (4): 195–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005.
- Perry, D. E., A. A. Porter, and L. G. Votta. 2000. “Empirical Studies of Software Engineering: A Roadmap.” In Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of Software Engineering, 345–355. ACM.
- Reinholz, D. 2016. “The Assessment Cycle: A Model for Learning through Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (2): 301–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1008982.
- Rico-Juan, J. R., A.-J. Gallego, and J. Calvo-Zaragoza. 2019. “Automatic Detection of Inconsistencies between Numerical Scores and Textual Feedback in Peer-Assessment Processes with Machine Learning.” Computers & Education 140: 103609. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103609.
- Rico-Juan, J. R., A.-J. Gallego, J. J. Valero-Mas, and J. Calvo-Zaragoza. 2018. “Statistical Semi-Supervised System for Grading Multiple Peer-Reviewed Open-Ended Works.” Computers & Education 126: 264–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.017.
- Sanchez, C. E., K. M. Atkinson, A. C. Koenka, H. Moshontz, and H. Cooper. 2017. “Self-Grading and Peer-Grading for Formative and Summative Assessments in 3rd through 12th Grade Classrooms: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Educational Psychology 109 (8): 1049–1066. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000190.
- Shen, B., B. Bai, and W. Xue. 2020. “The Effects of Peer Assessment on Learner Autonomy: An Empirical Study in a Chinese College English Writing Class.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 64: 100821. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100821.
- Stevens, D. D., and A. J. Levi. 2013. “Introduction to Rubrics: An Assessment Tool to save Grading Time.” In Convey Effective Feedback, and Promote Student Learning, 2nd ed. Herndon, VA: Stylus Publishing.
- To, J., and E. Panadero. 2019. “Peer Assessment Effects on the Self-Assessment Process of First-Year Undergraduates.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (6): 920–932. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1548559.
- Topping, K. 2003. “Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility.” In Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards, 55–87. Netherlands: Springer.
- Vygotsky, L. S. 1980. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Wang, Y., H. Li, Y. Feng, Y. Jiang, and Y. Liu. 2012. “Assessment of Programming Language Learning Based on Peer Code Review Model: Implementation and Experience Report.” Computers & Education 59 (2): 412–422. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.007.
- Wanner, T., and E. Palmer. 2018. “Formative Self-and Peer Assessment for Improved Student Learning: The Crucial Factors of Design, Teacher Participation and Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (7): 1032–1047. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698.
- Wilcoxon, F. 1945. “Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods.” Biometrics Bulletin 1 (6): 80–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3001968.
- Zheng, L., X. Zhang, and P. Cui. 2020. “The Role of Technology-Facilitated Peer Assessment and Supporting Strategies: A Meta-Analysis.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (3): 372–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1644603.