Supervisory feedback to postgraduate research students: a literature review

References

• Ali, J., H. Ullah, and N. Sanauddin. 2019. “Postgraduate Research Supervision: Exploring the Lived Experience of Pakistani Postgraduate Students.” FWU Journal of Social Sciences 13 (1): 14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew, M. 2012. “Supervising Doctorates at a Distance: Three trans-Tasman Stories.” Quality Assurance in Education 20 (1): 42–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881211198239.
   Google Scholar
• Baseer, N., J. Degnan, M. Moffat, and U. Mahboob. 2020. “Micro-Feedback Skills Workshop Impacts Perceptions and Practices of Doctoral Faculty.” BMC Medical Education 20 (1): 29–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1921-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baseer, N., U. Mahboob, and J. Degnan. 2017. “Micro-Feedback Training: Learning the Art of Effective Feedback.” Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 33 (6): 1525–1527. doi:https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.336.13721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basturkmen, H., M. East, and J. Bitchener. 2014. “Supervisors’ on-Script Feedback Comments on Drafts of Dissertations: Socialising Students into the Academic Discourse Community.” Teaching in Higher Education 19 (4): 432–445. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.752728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., and M. R. Leary. 1997. “Writing Narrative Literature Reviews.” Review of General Psychology 1 (3): 311–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311.
   Google Scholar
• Cekiso, M., B. Tshotsho, R. Masha, and T. Saziwa. 2019. “Supervision Experiences of Postgraduate Research Students at One South African Higher Education Institution.” South African Journal of Higher Education 33 (3): 8–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.20853/33-3-2913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cree, V. E. 2012. “‘I’d Like to Call You My Mother.’ Reflections on Supervising International PhD Students in Social Work.” Social Work Education 31 (4): 451–464. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2011.562287.
   Google Scholar
• Deshpande, A. 2017. “Faculty Best Practices to Support Students in the ‘Virtual Doctoral Land’.” Higher Education for the Future 4 (1): 12–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631116681211.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, Q., and N. Devine. 2018. “Exploring the Supervision Experiences of Chinese Overseas PhD Students in New Zealand.” Knowledge Cultures 6 (1): 62–78.
   Google Scholar
• Doloriert, C., S. Sambrook, and J. Stewart. 2012. “Power and Emotion in Doctoral Supervision: Implications for HRD.” European Journal of Training and Development 36 (7): 732–750. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591211255566.
   Google Scholar
• East, M., J. Bitchener, and H. Basturkmen. 2012. “What Constitutes Effective Feedback to Postgraduate Research Students? The Students’ Perspective.” Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 9 (2): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Engebretson, K., K. Smith, D. McLaughlin, C. Seibold, G. Terrett, and E. Ryan. 2008. “The Changing Reality of Research Education in Australia and Implications for Supervision: A Review of the Literature.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (1): 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701792112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C., and K. Stevenson. 2011. “The Experience of International Nursing Students Studying for a PhD in the U.K: A Qualitative Study.” BMC Nursing 10 (11): 11–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-10-11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ezebilo, E. 2012. “Challenges in Postgraduate Studies: Assessments by Doctoral Students in a Swedish University.” Higher Education Studies 2 (4): 49–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v2n4p49.
   Google Scholar
• Feather, D., and K. E. McDermott. 2014. “The Role of New Doctoral Supervisors in Higher Education - a Reflective View of Literature and Experience Using Two Case Studies.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 19 (2): 165–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2014.897506.
   Google Scholar
• González-Ocampo, G., and M. Castelló. 2018. “Writing in Doctoral Programs: Examining Supervisors’ Perspectives.” Higher Education 76 (3): 387–401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0214-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, K., R. Hackney, and D. Edgar. 2014. “Postgraduate Research Supervision: An ‘Agreed’ Conceptual View of Good Practice through Derived Metaphors.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 9: 043–060. doi:https://doi.org/10.28945/1952.
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. N., C. D. Johnson, and A. Adams. 2006. “Writing Narrative Literature Reviews for Peer-Reviewed Journals: Secrets of the Trade.” Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 5 (3): 101–117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, E., and N. Crowther. 2015. “Co-Supervision in Postgraduate Training: Ensuring the Right Hand Knows What the Left Hand is Doing.” South African Journal of Science 111 (11/12): 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2015/20140305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemer, S. R. 2012. “Informality, Power and Relationships in Postgraduate Supervision: Supervising PhD Candidates over Coffee.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (6): 827–839. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.674011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, K. J., and G. Wichmann-Hansen. 2017. “Validation of the Quality in PhD Processes Questionnaire.” Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education 8 (2): 189–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-17-00017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyns, T., P. Bresser, T. Buys, I. Coetzee, E. Korkie, Z. White, and B. Mc Cormack. 2019. “Twelve Tips for Supervisors to Move towards Person-Centered Research Supervision in Health Care Sciences.” Medical Teacher 41 (12): 1353–1358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1533241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P., J. Thomas, J. Chandler, M. Cumpston, T. Li, M. J. Page, and V. A. Welch. 2019. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Glasgow, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Juwah, C., D. Macfarlane-Dick, B. Matthew, D. Nicol, D. Ross, and B. Smith. 2004. “Enhancing Student Learning through Effective Formative Feedback.” The Higher Education Academy 140: 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. 2019. “Doctoral Supervisory Quality from the Perspective of Senior Academic Managers.” Australian Universities’ Review 61 (1): 12–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leggat, P., and K. Martinez. 2010. “Exploring Emerging Issues in Research Higher Degree Supervision of Professional Doctorate Students in the Health Sciences.” Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice 15 (4): 601–608. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9119-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, S. 2010. “Mentoring and Research Supervision in Music Education: Perspectives of Chinese Postgraduate Students.” International Journal of Music Education 28 (2): 145–158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761410362940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, J., D. Covrig, S. Freed, B. De Oliveira, M. Ongo, and I. Newman. 2019. “Strategies to Assist Distance Doctoral Students in Completing Their Dissertations.” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 20 (5): 192–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S. 2015. “What Works for Doctoral Students in Completing Their Thesis?” Teaching in Higher Education 20 (2): 183–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.974025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonka, K., E. Ketonen, J. Vekkaila, M. Cerrato Lara, and K. Pyhältö. 2019. “Doctoral Students’ Writing Profiles and Their Relations to Well-Being and Perceptions of the Academic Environment.” Higher Education 77 (4): 587–602. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0290-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. 2012. “Supervisors Watching Supervisors: The Deconstructive Possibilities and Tensions of Team Supervision.” Australian Universities’ Review 54 (1): 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Maor, D., and J. Currie. 2017. “The Use of Technology in Postgraduate Supervision Pedagogy in Two Australian Universities.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 14 (1): 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0046-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallin, A., and S. Nayar. 2012. “Postgraduate Research Supervision: A Critical Review of Current Practice.” Teaching in Higher Education 17 (1): 63–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.590979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, S., R. Pitt, and C. Manathunga. 2012. “Students’ Experiences of Supervision in Academic and Industry Settings: Results of an Australian Study.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (5): 619–636. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.557715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, B. A., A. Noraziah, and M. A. Majid. 2014. “Feedback in Postgraduate Supervisory Communication: An Insight from Educators.” The Online Journal of Quality in Higher Education 1 (3): 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Nasiri, F., and F. Mafakheri. 2015. “Postgraduate Research Supervision at a Distance: A Review of Challenges and Strategies.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (10): 1962–1969. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.914906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nethsinghe, R., and J. Southcott. 2015. “A Juggling Act: Supervisor/Candidate Partnership in a Doctoral Thesis by Publication.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 10: 167–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.28945/2256.
   Google Scholar
• NSW Government. 2020. "Types of Feedback." Accessed 15 September 2020. https://education.nsw.gov.au/teaching-and-learning/professional-learning/teacher-quality-and-accreditation/strong-start-great-teachers/refining-practice/feedback-to-students/types-of-feedback#Evaluative2.
   Google Scholar
• Odena, O., and H. Burgess. 2017. “How Doctoral Students and Graduates Describe Facilitating Experiences and Strategies for Their Thesis Writing Learning Process: A Qualitative Approach.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (3): 572–590. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1063598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos-López, P., and J. Sunderland. 2017. “Doctoral Supervisors’ and Supervisees’ Responses to Co-Supervision.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 41 (6): 727–740. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1177166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orellana, M. L., A. Darder, A. Perez, and J. Salinas. 2016. “Improving Doctoral Success by Matching PhD Students with Supervisors.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 11: 087–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.28945/3404.
   Google Scholar
• Paré, G., and S. Kitsiou. 2016. “Methods for Literature Reviews.” In Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-Based Approach, edited by Francis Lau and Craig Kuziemsky, 157–179. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Roumell, E. A. L., and D. U. Bolliger. 2017. “Experiences of Faculty with Doctoral Student Supervision in Programs Delivered via Distance.” The Journal of Continuing Higher Education 65 (2): 82–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2017.1320179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze, S. 2012. “Empowering and Disempowering Students in Student-Supervisor Relationships.” Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship 77 (2): 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v77i2.47.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S. V. 2014. “Practising What we Preach: Towards a Student-Centred Definition of Feedback.” Teaching in Higher Education 19 (1): 49–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.827639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severinsson, E. 2012. “Research Supervision: Supervisory Style, Research-Related Tasks, Importance and Quality - Part 1.” Journal of Nursing Management 20 (2): 215–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01361.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siltanen, J., X. Chen, A. Doyle, and A. Shotwell. 2019. “Teaching, Supervising, and Supporting PhD Students: Identifying Issues, Addressing Challenges, Sharing Strategies.” Canadian Review of Sociology = Revue Canadienne de Sociologie 56 (2): 274–291. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soumana, A. O., and M. R. Uddin. 2017. “Factors Influencing the Degree Progress of International PhD Students from Africa: An Exploratory Study.” Üniversitepark Bülten 6 (1): 79–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.22521/unibulletin.2017.61.7.
   Google Scholar
• Templier, M., and G. Paré. 2015. “A Framework for Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems 37 (6): 112–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03706.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T., and L. Y. Li. 2011. “Tell Me What to Do’ vs. ‘Guide Me through It’: Feedback Experiences of International Doctoral Students.” Active Learning in Higher Education 12 (2): 101–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411402438.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, A. 2013. “Empirical Study of the Important Elements in the Researcher Development Journey.” Knowledge Management & E-Learning 5 (1): 42–55.
   Google Scholar
• White, T., and E. Coetzee. 2014. “Postgraduate Supervision: E-Mail as an Alternative.” Africa Education Review 11 (4): 658–673. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2014.935010.
   Google Scholar
• Woolderink, M., K. Putnik, H. van der Boom, and G. Klabbers. 2015. “The Voice of PhD Candidates and PhD Supervisors. A Qualitative Exploratory Study Amongst PhD Candidates and Supervisors to Evaluate the Relational Aspects of PhD Supervision in The Netherlands.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 10: 217–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.28945/2276.
   Google Scholar
• Yarwood-Ross, L., and C. Haigh. 2014. “As Others See Us: What PhD Students Say about Supervisors.” Nurse Researcher 22 (1): 38–44. (2014+) doi:https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.1.38.e1274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeegers, M., and D. Barron. 2012. “Pedagogical Concerns in Doctoral Supervision: A Challenge for Pedagogy.” Quality Assurance in Education 20 (1): 20–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881211198211.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, C. M., C. M. Golde, and A. C. McCormick. 2007. “More than a Signature: How Advisor Choice and Advisor Behaviour Affect Doctoral Student Satisfaction.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 31 (3): 263–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701424983.
   Google Scholar