Learner engagement with written corrective feedback in ESL and EFL contexts: a qualitative research synthesis using a perception-based framework

References

• Al Shahrani, A., and N. Storch. 2014. “Investigating Teachers’ Written Corrective Feedback Practices in a Saudi EFL Context: How Do They Align with Their Beliefs, Institutional Guidelines, and Students’ Preferences?” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 37 (2): 101–122. doi:10.1075/aral.37.2.02als.
   Google Scholar
• Bearman, M., C. D. Smith, A. Carbone, S. Slade, C. Baik, M. Hughes-Warrington, and D. L. Neumann. 2012. “Systematic Review Methodology in Higher Education.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (5): 625–640. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.702735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J, and D. R. Ferris. 2012. Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., and U. Knoch. 2009. “The Value of a Focused Approach to Written Corrective Feedback.” ELT Journal 63 (3): 204–211. doi:10.1093/elt/ccn043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., and U. Knoch. 2010. “The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation.” Applied Linguistics 31 (2): 193–214. doi:10.1093/applin/amp016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J, and N. Storch. 2016. Written Corrective Feedback for L2 Development. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D., and D. Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1315–1325. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, S. W. 2019a. “A Systematic Review of Written Corrective Feedback Research in ESL/EFL Contexts.” Language Education and Assessment 2 (2): 57–95. doi:10.29140/lea.v2n2.138.
   Google Scholar
• *Chong, S. W. 2019b. “College Students’ Perception of e-Feedback: A Grounded Theory Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (7): 1090–1105. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1572067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, S. W., and H. Reinders. 2020. “Technology-Mediated Task-Based Language Teaching: A Qualitative Research Synthesis.” Language Learning & Technology 24 (3): 70–86. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, S. W. 2021. “Reconsidering Student Feedback Literacy from an Ecological Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (1): 92–104. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1730765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, S. W., and H. Reinders. 2021. “A Methodological Review of Qualitative Research Syntheses in CALL: The State-of-the-Art.” System, 103, 102646 103: 102646. doi:10.1016/j.system.2021.102646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, S. W., and L. Plonsky. 2021a. A typology of secondary research in Applied Linguistics. doi:10.31219/osf.io/msjrh. (pre-print).
   Google Scholar
• Chong, S. W., and L. Plonsky. 2021b. “A Primer on Qualitative Research Synthesis in TESOL.” TESOL Quarterly 55 (3): 1024–1034. doi:10.1002/tesq.3030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, S. W., T. J. Lin, and Y. Chen. 2022. “A Methodological Review of Systematic Literature Reviews in Higher Education: Heterogeneity and Homogeneity.” Educational Research Review 35: 100426. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. 1979. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. New York: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Çiftçi, E. Y., and P. Savaş. 2018. “The Role of Telecollaboration in Language and Intercultural Learning: A Synthesis of Studies Published between 2010 and 2015.” ReCALL 30 (3): 278–298. doi:10.1017/S0958344017000313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, D. J., C. D. Mulrow, and R. B. Haynes. 1997. “Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions.” Annals of Internal Medicine 126 (5): 376–380. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-00006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Coyle, Y., and J. Roca De Larios. 2020. “Exploring Young Learners’ Engagement with Models as a Written Corrective Technique in EFL and CLIL Settings.” System 95: 102374. doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2010. “Epilogue.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32 (2): 335–349. doi:10.1017/S0272263109990544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2015. “Introduction: Complementarity in Research Syntheses.” Applied Linguistics 36 (3): 285–289. doi:10.1093/applin/amv015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ene, E., and V. Kosobucki. 2016. “Rubrics and Corrective Feedback in ESL Writing: A Longitudinal Case Study of an L2 Writer.” Assessing Writing 30: 3–20. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. 1999. “The Case for Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes: A Response to Truscott (1996).” Journal of Second Language Writing 8 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80110-6.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. 2006. “Does Error Feedback Help Student Writers? New Evidence on the Short- and Long-Term Effects of Written Error Correction.” In Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, edited by K. Hyland & F. Hyland, 81–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. R. 2010. “Second Language Writing Research and Written Corrective Feedback in SLA.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32 (2): 181–201. doi:10.1017/S0272263109990490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. R., H. Liu, A. Sinha, and M. Senna. 2013. “Written Corrective Feedback for Individual L2 Writers.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (3): 307–329. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.00.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravett, K. 2022. “Feedback Literacies as Sociomaterial Practice.” Critical Studies in Education. Advanced Online Publication 63 (2): 261–274. doi:10.1080/17508487.2020.1747099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Y., and F. Hyland. 2015. “Exploring Learner Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback in a Chinese Tertiary EFL Classroom.” Journal of Second Language Writing 30: 31–44. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Han, Y. 2017. “Mediating and Being Mediated: Learner Beliefs and Learner Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback.” System 69: 133–142. doi:10.1016/j.system.2017.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Han, Y. 2019. “Written Corrective Feedback from an Ecological Perspective: The Interaction between the Context and Individual Learners.” System 80: 288–303. doi:10.1016/j.system.2018.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Han, Y., and F. Hyland. 2019. “Academic Emotions in Written Corrective Feedback Situations.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 38: 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Han, Y, and Y. Xu. 2019. Student feedback literacy and engagement with feedback: A case study of Chinese undergraduate students. Teaching in Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1648410.
   Google Scholar
• Hartshorn, K. J., N. W. Evans, P. F. Merrill, R. R. Sudweeks, D. Strong-Krause, and N. J. Anderson. 2010. “Effects of Dynamic Corrective Feedback on ESL Writing Accuracy.” TESOL Quarterly 44 (1): 84–109. doi:10.5054/tq.2010.213781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kim, H. R., and M. Bowles. 2019. “How Deeply Do Second Language Learners Process Written Corrective Feedback? Insights Gained from Think-Alouds.” TESOL Quarterly 53 (4): 913–938. doi:10.1002/tesq.522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kim, Y., and L. Emeliyanova. 2021. “The Effects of Written Corrective Feedback on the Accuracy of L2 Writing: Comparing Collaborative and Individual Revision Behavior.” Language Teaching Research 25 (2): 234–255. doi:10.1177/1362168819831406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junqueira, L., and C. Payant. 2015. “I Just Want to Do It Right, but It’s so Hard”: A Novice Teacher’s Written Feedback Beliefs and Practices.” Journal of Second Language Writing 27: 19–36. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2014.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, E., and Z. Han. 2015. “The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy: A Meta-Analysis.” The Modern Language Journal 99 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1111/modl.12189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. 2008. “Student Reactions to Teacher Feedback in Two Hong Kong Secondary Classrooms.” Journal of Second Language Writing 17 (3): 144–164. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. 2013. “Research into Practice: Written Corrective Feedback.” Language Teaching 46 (1): 108–119. doi:10.1017/S0261444812000390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. 2019. “Teachers’ Frequently Asked Questions about Focused Written Corrective Feedback.” TESOL Journal 10 (3). doi:10.1002/tesj.427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lee, I., N. Luo, and P. Mak. 2021. “Teachers’ Attempts at Focused Written Corrective Feedback in Situ.” Journal of Second Language Writing 54: 100809. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., and A. Vuono. 2019. “Twenty-Five Years of Research on Oral and Written Corrective Feedback in System.” System 84: 93–109. doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., and D. Brown. 2015. “Methodological Synthesis of Research on the Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 30: 66–81. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, S. S., and P. Crosthwaite. 2019. “Investigating Written Corrective Feedback: (Mis)Alignment of Teachers’ Beliefs and Practice.” Journal of Second Language Writing 45: 46–60. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2019.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, Z., and I. Lee. 2020. “Feedback Scope in Written Corrective Feedback: Analysis of Empirical Research in L2 Contexts.” Assessing Writing 45: 100469. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, J. W., and Z. Neal. 2013. “Nested or Networked? Future Directions for Ecological Systems Theory.” Social Development 22 (4): n/a–737. doi:10.1111/sode.12018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, J. M., and L. Ortega. 2007. “The Future of Research Synthesis in Applied Linguistics: Beyond Art or Science.” TESOL Quarterly 41 (4): 805–815. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00105.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M, and H. Roberts. 2005. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. California: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. 2007. “The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners’ Acquisition of Articles.” TESOL Quarterly 41 (2): 255–283. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y., D. Wright, and A. Moldawa. 2009. “Differential Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Correction on the Accurate Use of Grammatical Forms by Adult ESL Learners.” System 37 (4): 556–569. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shintani, N., and R. Ellis. 2013. “The Comparative Effect of Direct Written Corrective Feedback and Metalinguistic Explanation on Learners’ Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of the English Indefinite Article.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (3): 286–306. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shintani, N., and R. Ellis. 2015. “Does Language Analytical Ability Mediate the Effect of Written Feedback on Grammatical Accuracy in Second Language Writing?” System 49: 110–119. doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. 2018. “Written Corrective Feedback from Sociocultural Theoretical Perspectives: A Research Agenda.” Language Teaching 51 (2): 262–277. doi:10.1017/S0261444818000034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. 1996. “The Case against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes.” Language Learning 46 (2): 327–369. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Waller, L., and M. Papi. 2017. “Motivation and Feedback: How Implicit Theories of Intelligence Predict L2 Writers’ Motivation and Feedback Orientation.” Journal of Second Language Writing 35: 54–65. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Yu, S., L. Jiang, and N. Zhou. 2020. “Investigating What Feedback Practices Contribute to Students’ Writing Motivation and Engagement in Chinese EFL Context: A Large Scale Study.” Assessing Writing 44: 100451. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zhang, Z. 2021. Promoting student engagement with feedback: insights from collaborative pedagogy and teacher feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Advanced online publication, 1–16. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1933900.
   Google Scholar
• *Zheng, Y., and S. Yu. 2018. “Student Engagement with Teacher Written Corrective Feedback in EFL Writing: A Case Study of Chinese Lower-Proficiency Students.” Assessing Writing 37: 13–24. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zheng, Y. S. Yu, and Z. Liu. 2020. Understanding individual differences in lower-proficiency students’ engagement with teacher written corrective feedback. Teaching in Higher Education. Advanced online publication, 1–21.doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1806225.
   Google Scholar