Disclosing own reasoning while appraising the students’ reasoning: implications for developments in formative assessment in science-engineering education

References

• Ajjawi, R., and M. Bearman. 2018. “Problematising Standards: Representation or Performance?” In Developing Evaluative Judgement in Higher Education, edited by R. Ajjawi and P. Dawson, 41–50. Abingdon Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L. 2019. “A Critical Review of Research on Student Self-Assessment.” Frontiers in Education 4 doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00087.
   Google Scholar
• Barger, M. M., S. V. Wormington, L. G. Huettel, and L. Linnenbrink-Garcia. 2016. “Developmental Changes in College Engineering Students’ Personal Epistemology Profiles.” Learning and Individual Differences 48: 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman, M., and R. Ajjawi. 2021. “Can a Rubric Do More than Be Transparent? Invitation as a New Metaphor for Assessment Criteria.” Studies in Higher Education 46 (2): 359–368. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1637842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon, M., and T. Knuuttila. 2009. “Models as Epistemic Tools in Engineering Sciences: A Pragmatic Approach.” In Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, edited by A. Meijers, vol. 9, 687–720. North-Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bromme, R., S. Pieschl, and E. Stahl. 2010. “Epistemological Beliefs Are Standards for Adaptive Learning: A Functional Theory about Epistemological Beliefs and Metacognition.” Metacognition and Learning 5 (1): 7–26. doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9053-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damsa, C., and A. Jornet. 2017. “Revisiting Learning in Higher Education–Framing Notions Redefined through an Ecological Perspective.” Front Learning Research 4 (4): 39–47. doi:10.14786/flr.v4i4.208.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., B. M. Cartiff, and R. F. Duke. 2018. “A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relationship between Epistemic Cognition and Academic Achievement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 110 (8): 1084–1111. doi:10.1037/edu0000263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K., and P. R. Pintrich. 1997. “The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning.” Review of Educational Research 67 (1): 88–140. doi:10.3102/00346543067001088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K., and P. R. Pintrich. 2012. Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knuuttila, T., and M. Boon. 2011. “How Do Models Give us Knowledge? The Case of Carnot’s Ideal Heat Engine.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1 (3): 309–334. doi:10.1007/s13194-011-0029-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonka, K., E. Ketonen, and J. D. Vermunt. 2021. “University Students’ Epistemic Profiles, Conceptions of Learning, and Academic Performance.” Higher Education 81 (4): 775–793. doi:10.1007/s10734-020-00575-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui, A. M., and H. L. Andrade. 2022. “Inside the Next Black Box: Examining Students’ Responses to Teacher Feedback in a Formative Assessment Context.” Frontiers in Education 7. doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.751549.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and R. Säljö. 1997. “Approaches to Learning.” In The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education, 2nd ed., edited by F. Marton, D. Hounsell and N. Entwistle, 39–58. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McComas, W. F. 2002. “The Principal Elements of the Nature of Science: Dispelling the Myths.” In The Nature of Science in Science Education. Rationales and Strategies, edited by W. F. McComas. New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McComas, W. F., M. P. Clough, and H. Almazroa. 2002. “The Role and Character of the Nature of Science in Science Education.” In The Nature of Science in Science Education. Rationales and Strategies, edited by W. F. McComas. New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., L. D. Bendixen, and F. C. Haerle. 2006. “Domain-Generality and Domain-Specificity in Personal Epistemology Research: Philosophical and Empirical Reflections in the Development of a Theoretical Framework.” Educational Psychology Review 18 (1): 3–54. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9003-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orozco, M., M. Boon, and A. Susarrey Arce. 2022a. “Action Research on Electrochemistry Learning: Conceptual Modelling Intervention to Promote Disciplinary Understanding, Scientific Inquiry and Reasoning.” Paper Presented at the SEFI 2022 Conference, Barcelona, September 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Orozco, M., M. Boon, and A. Susarrey Arce. 2022b. “Learning Electrochemistry through Scientific Inquiry. Conceptual Modelling as Learning Objective and as Scaffold.” European Journal of Engineering Education 1–17. doi:10.1080/03043797.2022.2047894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., and A. Jonsson. 2013. “The Use of Scoring Rubrics for Formative Assessment Purposes Revisited: A Review.” Educational Research Review 9: 129–144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., and A. Jonsson. 2020. “A Critical Review of the Arguments against the Use of Rubrics.” Educational Research Review 30: 100329. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastore, S., and H. L. Andrade. 2019. “Teacher Assessment Literacy: A Three-Dimensional Model.” Teaching and Teacher Education 84: 128–138. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragupathi, K., and A. Lee. 2020. “Beyond Fairness and Consistency in Grading: The Role of Rubrics in Higher Education.” In Diversity and Inclusion in Global Higher Education, edited by C. S. Sanger and N. W. Gleason, 73–95. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, Y. M., and H. Andrade. 2010. “A Review of Rubric Use in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (4): 435–448. doi:10.1080/02602930902862859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. 2009. “Learning, Theories of Learning, and Units of Analysis in Research.” Educational Psychologist 44 (3): 202–208. doi:10.1080/00461520903029030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schommer, M. 1993. “Epistemological Development and Academic Performance among Secondary Students.” Journal of Educational Psychology 85 (3): 406–411. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schommer-Aikins, M., W.-C. Mau, S. Brookhart, and R. Hutter. 2000. “Understanding Middle Students’ Beliefs about Knowledge and Learning Using a Multidimensional Paradigm.” The Journal of Educational Research 94 (2): 120–127. doi:10.1080/00220670009598750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderstrom, N. C., and R. A. Bjork. 2015. “Learning versus Performance: An Integrative Review.” Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science 10 (2): 176–199. doi:10.1177/1745691615569000.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Songer, N. B., and M. C. Linn. 1991. “How Do Students’ Views of Science Influence Knowledge Integration?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28 (9): 761–784. doi:10.1002/tea.3660280905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, J., R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, P. Dawson, and E. Panadero. 2018. “Developing Evaluative Judgement: Enabling Students to Make Decisions about the Quality of Work.” Higher Education 76 (3): 467–481. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. 2000. “The Development of Scientific Reasoning Skills.” Developmental Review 20 (1): 99–149. doi:10.1006/drev.1999.0497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar