Enhancing feedback practices within PhD supervision: a qualitative framework synthesis of the literature

References

• Acker, S., T. Hill, and E. Black. 1994. “Thesis Supervision in the Social Sciences: Managed or Negotiated?” Higher Education 28 (4): 483–498. doi:10.1007/BF01383939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitchison, C., B. Kamler, and A. Lee. 2010. Publishing Pedagogies for the Doctorate and beyond. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aitchison, C., J. Catterall, P. Ross, and S. Burgin. 2012. “Tough Love and Tears’: Learning Doctoral Writing in the Sciences.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (4): 435–447. doi:10.1080/07294360.2011.559195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajjawi, R., and G. Regehr. 2019. “When I Say … Feedback.” Medical Education 53 (7): 652–654. doi:10.1111/medu.13746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Makhamreh, M., and B. Kutsyuruba. 2021. “The Role of Trust in Doctoral Student - Supervisor Relationships in Canadian Universities: The Students’ Lived Experiences and Perspectives.” Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 21 (2): 124–138. doi:10.33423/jhetp.v21i2.4124.
   Google Scholar
• Alabdulaziz, M. S. 2020. “Saudi Mathematics Students’ Experiences and Challenges with Their Doctoral Supervisors in UK Universities.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 15 (1): 237–263. doi:10.28945/4538.
   Google Scholar
• Alebaikan, R., Y. Bain, and S. Cornelius. 2020. “Experiences of Distance Doctoral Supervision in Cross-Cultural Teams.” Teaching in Higher Education 28 (1): 17–34. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1767057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, J., H. Ullah, and N. Sanauddin. 2019. “Postgraduate Research Supervision: Exploring the Lived Experience of Pakistani Postgraduate Students.” FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 13 (1): 14–25. http://sbbwu.edu.pk/journal/FWU_Journal_Summer%202013_Summer%202019_Vol_13_No_1/2.%20Postgraduate%20Research%20Supervision%20Exploring%20the%20Lived%20Experience.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhouse, J., B. A. Ungadi, and M. Cross. 2015. “They Can’t Even Agree!’: Students’ Conversations about Their Supervisors in Constructing Understandings of the Doctorate.” South African Journal of Higher Education 29(4), 14–34. doi:10.20853/29-4-507.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, B. J., and A. E. Austin. 2009. “The Role of Doctoral Advisors: A Look at Advising from the Advisor’s Perspective.” Innovative Higher Education 33 (5): 297–315. doi:10.1007/s10755-008-9084-x.
   Google Scholar
• Bastalich, W. 2017. “Content and Context in Knowledge Production: A Critical Review of Doctoral Supervision Literature.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (7): 1145–1157. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1079702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman, M., and P. Dawson. 2013. “Qualitative Synthesis and Systematic Review in Health Professions Education.” Medical Education 47 (3): 252–260. doi:10.1111/medu.12092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengsten, S. S. E. 2016. Doctoral Supervision: Organisation and Dialogue. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bing-You, R., K. Varaklis, V. Hayes, R. Trowbridge, H. Kemp, and D. McKelvy. 2018. “The Feedback Tango: An Integrative Review and Analysis of the Content of the Teacher–Learner Feedback Exchange.” Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 93 (4): 657–663. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., H. Basturkmen, and M. East. 2010. “The Focus of Supervisor Written Feedback to Thesis/Dissertation Students.” International Journal of English Studies 10 (2): 79–97. doi:10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119201.
   Google Scholar
• Blicblau, A. S., K. J. McManus, and A. Prince. 2009. “Developing Writing Skills for Graduate Nesbc Students.” The Reading Matrix, 9 (2): 198–210.
   Google Scholar
• Blythe, S. M. 2019. “Effective Research Supervision.” Journal of European Baptist Studies, 19 (1): 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and E. Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., R. Ajjawi, P. Dawson, and J. Tai. 2018. Developing Evaluative Judgement in Higher Education: Assessment for Knowing and Producing Quality Work. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Broegaard, R. B. 2018. “PhD Supervision Strategies in a Cross-Cultural Setting: Enriching Learning Opportunities.” Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift 13 (25): 18–36. doi:10.7146/dut.v13i25.104330.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., and P. H. Winne. 1995. “Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis.” Review of Educational Research 65 (3): 245–281. doi:10.3102/00346543065003245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., and D. Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1315–1325. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., J. Jung, and Y. Li. 2023. “Feedback as Socialization in Doctoral Education: Towards the Enactment of Authentic Feedback.” Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2023.2242888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, S., and V. Kumar. 2017. “Ignoring Me is Part of Learning’: Supervisory Feedback on Doctoral Writing.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 54 (1): 68–75. doi:10.1080/14703297.2015.1123104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catterall, J., P. Ross, C. Aitchison, and S. Burgin. 2011. “Pedagogical Approaches That Facilitate Writing in Postgraduate Research Candidature in Science and Technology.” Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 8 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee Padmanabhan, M., and L. C. Rossetto. 2017. “Doctoral Writing Advisors Navigating the Supervision Terrain.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 54 (6): 580–589. doi:10.1080/14703297.2017.1348961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chugh, R., S. Macht, and B. Harreveld. 2021. “Supervisory Feedback to Postgraduate Research Students: A Literature Review.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47 (5): 683–697. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1955241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, H., and C. Ryan. 2006. “Changing over a Project Changing over: A Project–Research Supervision as a Conversation.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 19 (4): 477–497. doi:10.1080/09518390600773239.
   Google Scholar
• Cotterall, S. 2011. “Doctoral Pedagogy: What Do International PhD Students in Australia Think about It.” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities 19 (2): 521–534. doi:10.1080/13562517.2011.560381.
   Google Scholar
• De Caux, C. 2021. “Doctoral Candidates Academic Writing Output and Strategies: Navigating the Challenges of Academic Writing during a Global Health Crisis Basil.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 16: 291–317. doi:10.28945/4755.
   Google Scholar
• Delamont, S., O. Parry, and P. Atkinson. 1998. “Creating a Delicate Balance: The Doctoral Supervisor’s Dilemmas.” Teaching in Higher Education 3 (2): 157–172. doi:10.1080/1356215980030203.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, K., and K. H. Hunter. 2017. “PhD Student Emotional Exhaustion: The Role of Supportive Supervision and Self-Presentation Behaviours.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 54 (4): 335–344. doi:10.1080/14703297.2016.1174143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Q., and N. Devine. 2018. “Exploring the Supervision Experiences of Chinese Overseas Phd Students in New Zealand.” Knowledge Cultures, 6 (1): 62–78. doi:10.22381/kc6120186.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods, M. 2011. “Using Framework-Based Synthesis for Conducting Reviews of Qualitative Studies.” BMC Medicine 9 (1): 39. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-9-39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, D. L., and S. Kobayashi. 2019. “How Can PhD Supervisors Play a Role in Bridging Academic Cultures?” Teaching in Higher Education 24 (8): 911–929. doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1517305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engebretson, K., K. Smith, D. McLaughlin, C. Seibold, G. Terrett, and E. Ryan. 2008. “The Changing Reality of Research Education in Australia and Implications for Supervision: A Review of the Literature.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/13562510701792112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C. 2013. “Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education.” Review of Educational Research 83 (1): 70–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., M. Nerland, and K. Jensen. 2012. “Sociomaterial Approaches to Conceptualising Professional Learning and Practice.” Journal of Education and Work 25 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1080/13639080.2012.644901.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, E., and K. Fitzpatrick. 2015. “Disturbing the Divide.” Qualitative Inquiry 21 (1): 50–58. doi:10.1177/1077800414542692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullagar, S., A. Pavlidis, and R. Stadler. 2017. “Critical Moments of (Un)Doing Doctoral Supervision: Collaborative Writing as Rhizomatic Practice.” Knowledge Cultures, 5 (4): 23–41. doi:10.22381/kc5420173.
   Google Scholar
• González-Ocampo, G., and M. Castelló. 2018. “Writing in Doctoral Programs: Examining Supervisors’ Perspectives.” Higher Education 76 (3): 387–401. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0214-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravett, K. 2020. “Feedback Literacies as Sociomaterial Practice.” Critical Studies in Education 63 (2): 261–274. doi:10.1080/17508487.2020.1747099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin, C., and I. Green. 2015. “They’re the Bosses’: Feedback in Team Supervision.” Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39 (3): 320–335. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2013.831039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson, R., G. Jonasson, and A. Billhult. 2013. “The Experience of Disagreement between Students and Supervisors in PhD Education: A Qualitative Study.” BMC Medical Education 13 (1): 134. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-13-134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbert, K. 2015. “Students’ Perceptions of a ‘Quality’ Advisory Relationship.” Quality in Higher Education 21 (1): 26–37. doi:10.1080/13538322.2015.1049439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasrati, M. 2005. “Legitimate Peripheral Participation and Supervising Ph.D. students.” Studies in Higher Education 30 (5): 557–570. doi:10.1080/03075070500249252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemer, S. R. 2012. “Informality, Power and Relationships in Postgraduate Supervision: Supervising PhD Candidates over Coffee.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (6): 827–839. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.674011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., M. Phillips, T. Ryan, D. Boud, P. Dawson, E. Molloy, and P. Mahoney. 2019. “Conditions That Enable Effective Feedback.” Higher Education Research & Development 38 (7): 1401–1416. doi:10.1080/07294360.2019.1657807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopman, J. 2021. “Fieldwork Supervision: Supporting Ethical Reflexivity to Enhance Research Analysis.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 44 (1): 41–52. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2019.1706467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., K. van Veen, and A. Corda. 2016. “Pushing Too Little, Praising Too Much? Intercultural Misunderstandings between a Chinese Doctoral Student and a Dutch Supervisor.” Studying Teacher Education 12 (1): 70–87. doi:10.1080/17425964.2015.1111204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., X. Zhao, and K. van Veen. 2020. “Unraveling the Implicit Challenges in Fostering Independence: Supervision of Chinese Doctoral Students at Dutch Universities.” Instructional Science 48 (2): 205–221. doi:10.1007/s11251-020-09505-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inouye, K. S., L. McAlpine, and L. Practice. 2017. “Developing Scholarly Identity: Variation in Agentive Responses to Supervisor Feedback.” Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 14 (2): 35–54. doi:10.53761/1.14.2.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman, P. C., and K. Sisson. 2021. “Promoting Psychological Well-Being in Doctoral Students: A Qualitative Study Adopting a Positive Psychology Perspective.” Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education 13 (1): 19–35. doi:10.1108/SGPE-11-2020-0073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D., T. Power, and K. Usher. 2021. “Feedback as a Balancing Act: Qualitative Insights from an Experienced Multi-Cultural Sample of Doctoral Supervisors in Nursing.” Nurse Education in Practice 54: 103125. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. E., J. L. Keating, and E. K. Molloy. 2020. “Psychological Safety in Feedback: What Does It Look like and How Can Educators Work with Learners to Foster It?” Medical Education 54 (6): 559–570. doi:10.1111/medu.14154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. M. 2014. “Doctorates in the Dark: Threshold Concepts and the Improvement of Doctoral Supervision.” 69–81. doi:10.15663/wje.v19i2.99.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. 2016. “Feedback Effectiveness in Professional Learning Contexts.” Review of Education 4 (2): 195–229. doi:10.1002/rev3.3061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A., and E. Blass. 2019. “The Impact of Institutional Power on Higher Degree Research Supervision: Implications for the Quality of Doctoral Outcomes.” Universal Journal of Educational Research 7 (7): 1485–1494. doi:10.13189/ujer.2019.070702.
   Google Scholar
• Kamler, B., and P. Thomson. 2014. Helping Doctoral Students Write: Pedagogies for Supervision. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. 2018. “Crises in a Doctoral Research Project: A Comparative Study [Report].” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 13: 211–231. https://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A547630757/AONE?u=deakin&sid=AONE&xid=29ca9766. doi:10.28945/4044.
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., and A. DeNisi. 1996. “The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a Meta-Analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory.” Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2): 254–284. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., and A. Kaur. 2019. “Supervisory Practices for Intrinsic Motivation of Doctoral Students: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 14: 581–595. doi:10.28945/4415.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, S., J. Draper, and J. Silverman. 2005. Teaching and Learning Communication Skills in Medicine. Oxford: Radcliffe publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. 2008. “How Are Doctoral Students Supervised? Concepts of Doctoral Research Supervision.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (3): 267–281. doi:10.1080/03075070802049202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leijen, Ä., L. Lepp, and M. Remmik. 2016. “Why Did I Drop out? Former Students’ Recollections about Their Study Process and Factors Related to Leaving the Doctoral Studies.” Studies in Continuing Education 38 (2): 129–144. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2015.1055463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., and C. Seale. 2007. “Managing Criticism in Ph.D. supervision: A Qualitative Case Study.” Studies in Higher Education 32 (4): 511–526. doi:10.1080/03075070701476225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. 2006. “A Doctoral Student of Physics Writing for Publication: A Sociopolitically-Oriented Case Study.” English for Specific Purposes 25 (4): 456–478. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. 2016. “Publish SCI Papers or No Degree”: Practices of Chinese Doctoral Supervisors in Response to the Publication Pressure on Science Students.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 36 (4): 545–558. doi:10.1080/02188791.2015.1005050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, A. F., and M. Godfrey. 2004. “An Evaluation Tool to Assess the Quality of Qualitative Research Studies.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 7 (2): 181–196. doi:10.1080/1364557032000045302.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, D., L. Seaton, C. McMullen, T. Fitzgerald, E. Otsuji, and A. Lee. 2008. “Becoming and Being Writers’: The Experiences of Doctoral Students in Writing Groups.” Studies in Continuing Education 30 (3): 263–275. doi:10.1080/01580370802439870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., and M. McKinnon. 2013. “Supervision – the Most Variable of Variables: Student Perspectives.” Studies in Continuing Education 35 (3): 265–280. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2012.746227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mewburn, I., E. Tokareva, D. Cuthbert, J. Sinclair, and R. Barnacle. 2014. “These Are Issues That Should Not Be Raised in Black and White’: The Culture of Progress Reporting and the Doctorate.” Higher Education Research & Development 33 (3): 510–522. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.841649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, D., and J. Paulson. 2014. “Making Social Scientists, or Not? Glimpses of the Unmentionable in Doctoral Education.” Learning and Teaching 7 (3): 73–97. doi:10.3167/latiss.2014.070304.
   Google Scholar
• Molloy, E., and M. Bearman. 2019. “Embracing the Tension between Vulnerability and Credibility: ‘Intellectual Candour’ in Health Professions Education.” Medical Education 53 (1): 32–41. doi:10.1111/medu.13649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N. T. B., and I. Mushin. 2022. “Understanding Equivocal Feedback in PhD Supervision Meetings: A Conversation Analysis Approach.” Teaching in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/13562517.2022.2068348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomnian, S. 2017. “Thai PhD Students and Their Supervisors at an Australian University: Working Relationship, Communication, and Agency.” PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand 53: 26–58.
   Google Scholar
• Odena, O., and H. Burgess. 2017. “How Doctoral Students and Graduates Describe Facilitating Experiences and Strategies for Their Thesis Writing Learning Process: A Qualitative Approach.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (3): 572–590. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1063598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos-López, P., and J. Sunderland. 2017. “Doctoral Supervisors’ and Supervisees’ Responses to co-Supervision.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 41 (6): 727–740. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2016.1177166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, C., N. Mays, and J. Popay. 2007. Synthesising Qualitative and Quantitative Health Evidence: A Guide to Methods: A Guide to Methods. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. 2017. “Aspects of Mentorship in Team Supervision of Doctoral Students in Australia.” The Australian Educational Researcher 44 (4–5): 409–424. doi:10.1007/s13384-017-0241-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems [Journal Article.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Martín, C., and L. Seloni. 2019. “Transdisciplinary Becoming as a Gendered Activity: A Reflexive Study of Dissertation Mentoring.” Journal of Second Language Writing 43: 24–35. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2018.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultze, U., and M. Avital. 2011. “Designing Interviews to Generate Rich Data for Information Systems Research.” Information and Organization 21 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2010.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen-Utheim, A., and A. L. Wittek. 2017. “Dialogic Feedback and Potentialities for Student Learning.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 15: 18–30. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, X., and J. Trent. 2020. “Promoting Agentive Feedback Engagement through Dialogically Minded Approaches in Doctoral Writing Supervision.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 59 (4): 387–397. doi:10.1080/14703297.2020.1861965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, J., R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, P. Dawson, and E. Panadero. 2018. “Developing Evaluative Judgement: Enabling Students to Make Decisions about the Quality of Work.” Higher Education 76 (3): 467–481. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtanen, V., J. Taina, and K. Pyhältö. 2017. “What Disengages Doctoral Students in the Biological and Environmental Sciences from Their Doctoral Studies?” Studies in Continuing Education 39 (1): 71–86. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2016.1250737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling, C., E. Driessen, C. P. van der Vleuten, M. Vanstone, and L. Lingard. 2013. “Beyond Individualism: Professional Culture and Its Influence on Feedback.” Medical Education 47 (6): 585–594. doi:10.1111/medu.12150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, J., S. Carter, and D. Laurs. 2019. “Handling the Loss of Innocence: First-Time Exchange of Writing and Feedback in Doctoral Supervision.” Higher Education Research & Development 38 (1): 157–169. doi:10.1080/07294360.2018.1541074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weise, C., M. Aguayo-González, and M. Castelló. 2020. “Significant Events and the Role of Emotion along Doctoral Researcher Personal Trajectories.” Educational Research 62 (3): 304–323. doi:10.1080/00131881.2020.1794924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitelock, D., D. Faulkner, and D. Miell. 2008. “Promoting Creativity in PhD Supervision: Tensions and Dilemmas.” Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3 (2): 143–153. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2008.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., G. Robinson, V. Trafford, E. Creighton, and M. Warnes. 2003. “Recognising and Overcoming Dissonance in Postgraduate Student Research.” Studies in Higher Education 28 (1): 91–105. doi:10.1080/03075070309304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisniewski, B., K. Zierer, and J. Hattie. 2019. “The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 3087. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L. 2017. “Written Feedback in Intercultural Doctoral Supervision: A Case Study.” Teaching in Higher Education 22 (2): 239–255. doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1237483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L., and J. Hu. 2020. “Language Feedback Responses, Voices and Identity (Re)Construction: Experiences of Chinese International Doctoral Students.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 57 (6): 724–735. doi:10.1080/14703297.2019.1593214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L., S. T. Lin, and J. Cai. 2021. “Feedback Engagement of Chinese International Doctoral Students.” Studies in Continuing Education 43 (1): 119–135. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2020.1718634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., and R. Yuan. 2020. “Early-Stage Doctoral Students’ Conceptions of Research in Higher Education: Cases from Hong Kong.” Teaching in Higher Education 28 (1): 85–100. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1775191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar