Students’ perceptions of fairness in groupwork assessment: validity evidence for peer assessment fairness instrument

References

• Adams, J. S. 1965. “Inequity in Social Exchange.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by L. Berkowitz, Vol. 2, 267–299. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, Praveen, and Connie L. O’Brien. 2008. “Social Loafing on Group Projects: Structural Antecedents and Effect on Student Satisfaction.” Journal of Marketing Education 30 (3): 255–264. doi:10.1177/0273475308322283.
   Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education (AERA, APA, and NCME). 2014. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Barsky, A. E., and L. Wood. 2005. “Conflict Avoidance in a University Context.” Higher Education Research & Development 24 (3): 249–264. doi:10.1080/07294360500153984.
   Google Scholar
• Bies, R. J., and J. S. Moag. 1986. “Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness.” In Research on Negotiation in Organizations, edited by R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, and M. H. Bazerman, Vol. 1, 43–55. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. 2013. Grading and Group Work: How Do I Assess Individual Learning When Students Work Together? Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L. 2008. Conceptions of Assessment: Understanding What Assessment Means to Teachers and Students. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, A. 2013. “Students’ Perceptions of Fairness in Peer Assessment: Evidence from a Problem-Based Learning Course.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (5): 491–505. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.753051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., and P. Brickman. 2018. “When Group Work Doesn’t Work: Insights from Students.” CBE Life Sciences Education 17 (3): ar42. doi:10.1187/cbe.17-09-0199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. 1951. “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests.” Psychometrika 16 (3): 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropanzano, R., A. Li, and L. Benson. 2011. “Peer Justice and Teamwork Process.” Group & Organization Management 36 (5): 567–596. doi:10.1177/1059601111417990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, W. M. 2009. “Groupwork as a Form of Assessment: Common Problems and Recommended Solutions.” Higher Education 58 (4): 563–584. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9216-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, J., M. Latijnhouwers, A. Norbart, and R. A. Tio. 2016. “Assessing the ‘I’ in Group Work Assessment: State of the Art and Recommendations for Practice.” Medical Teacher 38 (7): 675–682. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2016.1170796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, J., and A. Hanna. 2023. “Assessment Reform and Students’ Voices.” In International Encyclopedia of Education (Fourth Edition), edited by R. J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, and K. Ercikan, 4th ed., 119–128. Cambridge, UK: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.09029-1.
   Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. E. 1983. “Construct Validity: Construct Representation versus Nomothetic Span.” Psychological Bulletin 93 (1): 179–197. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.93.1.179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsell, J., K. Forslund Frykedal, and E. Hammar Chiriac. 2020. “Group Work Assessment: Assessing Social Skills at Group Level.” Small Group Research 51 (1): 87–124. doi:10.1177/1046496419878269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin, M., R. Cropanzano, N. Cugueró-Escofet, T. Nadisic, and H. Van Wagoner. 2020. “How Do People Judge Fairness in Supervisor and Peer Relationships? Another Assessment of the Dimensions of Justice.” Human Relations 73 (12): 1632–1663. doi:10.1177/0018726719875497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, D., V. Hung, and W-m Lui. 2018. “Enhancing Science Learning through the Introduction of Effective Group Work in Hong Kong Secondary Classrooms.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16 (7): 1291–1314. doi:10.1007/s10763-017-9839-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. 1987. “A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories.” Academy of Management Review 12 (1): 9–22. doi:10.5465/amr.1987.4306437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güler, Çetin. Ç 2017. “Use of WhatsApp in Higher Education: What’s up with Assessing Peers Anonymously?” Journal of Educational Computing Research 55 (2): 272–289. doi:10.1177/0735633116667359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gweon, G., S. Jun, S. Finger, and C. P. Rosé. 2017. “Towards Effective Group Work Assessment: Even What You Don’t See Can Bias You.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 27 (1): 165–180. doi:10.1007/s10798-015-9332-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D., and S. Buzwell. 2013. “The Problem of Free-Riding in Group Projects: Looking beyond Social Loafing as Reason for Non-Contribution.” Active Learning in Higher Education 14 (1): 37–49. doi:10.1177/1469787412467123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannigan, C., D. Alonzo, and C. Z. Oo. 2022. “Student Assessment Literacy: Indicators and Domains from the Literature.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 29 (4): 482–504. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2021.1879203.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, M., M. McCutcheon, and J. Doran. 2014. “Student Views on Assessment Activities: Perspectives from Their Experience on an Undergraduate Programme.” Accounting Education 23 (5): 467–482. doi:10.1080/09639284.2014.949802.
   Google Scholar
• Ion, G., A. Díaz-Vicario, and C. Mercader. 2023. “Making Steps towards Improved Fairness in Group Work Assessment: The Role of Students’ Self-and Peer-Assessment.” Active Learning in Higher Education. doi:10.1177/14697874231154826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, K., Y. H. Liu, and L. P. Johnson. 2014. “Group Regulation and Social-Emotional Interactions Observed in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning: Comparison between Good vs. Poor Collaborators.” Computers & Education 78: 185–200. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal, G. 1980. “What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Justice in Social Relationships.” In Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, edited by K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, and R. Willis, Vol. 9, 27–55. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, A., and R. Cropanzano. 2009. “Fairness at the Group Level: Justice Climate and Intraunit Justice Climate.” Journal of Management 35 (3): 564–599. doi:10.1177/0149206308330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, A., R. Cropanzano, and J. Bagger. 2013. “Justice Climate and Peer Justice Climate: A Closer Look.” Small Group Research 44 (5): 563–592. doi:10.1177/104649641349811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, G.-Y. 2018. “Anonymous versus Identified Peer Assessment via a Facebook-Based Learning Application.” Computers & Education 116: 81–92. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., and A. Steckelberg. 2004. “Using Peer Feedback to Enhance Student Meaningful Learning.” Paper presented at the Conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Chicago, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Loughry, M. L., M. W. Ohland, and D. D. Moore. 2007. “Development of a Theory-Based Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness.” Educational Psychological Measurement 67: 505–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, G. S. 2023. “Assessment and Accountability Global Trends and Future Directions in 21st Century Competencies.” In International Encyclopedia of Education (Fourth Edition), edited by R.J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, and K. Ercikan, 4th ed., 313–320. Cambridge MA. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.09069-2.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. 1999. Test Theory: A Unified Treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, H., R. Hoekstra, J. Brouwer, and J.-W. Strijbos. 2020. “Unfolding Collaborative Learning Assessment Literacy: A Reflection on Current Assessment Methods in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (8): 1222–1240. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1729696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellor, T. 2012. “Group Work Assessment: Some Key Considerations in Developing Good Practice.” Planet 25 (1): 16–20. doi:10.11120/plan.2012.00250016.
   Google Scholar
• Nieminen, J. H., and L. Tuohilampi. 2020. “Finally Studying for Myself’ – Examining Student Agency in Summative and Formative Self-Assessment Models.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (7): 1031–1045. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1720595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. W. 2014. Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis. Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E. 2016. “Is It Safe? Social, Interpersonal, and Human Effects of Peer Assessment: A Review and Future Directions.” In Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment, edited by G. T. L. Brown and L. R. Harris, 247–266. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., M. Alqassab, J. Fernández Ruiz, and J. C. Ocampo. 2023. “A Systematic Review on Peer Assessment: Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Factors.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48 (8): 1053–1075. doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2164884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., M. Romero, and J. Strijbos. 2013. “The Impact of a Rubric and Friendship on Peer Assessment: Effects on Construct Validity, Performance, and Perceptions of Fairness and Comfort.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 39 (4): 195–203. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W., and M. L. Hilton, eds. 2012. Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pretsch, J., and N. Ehrhardt-Madapathi. 2018. “Experiences of Justice in School and Attitudes towards Democracy: A Matter of Social Exchange?” Social Psychology of Education 21 (3): 655–675. doi:10.1007/s11218-018-9435-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2020. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rasooli, A., C. DeLuca, L. Cheng, and A. Mousavi. 2023b. “Classroom Assessment Fairness Inventory: A New Instrument to Support Perceived Fairness in Classroom Assessment.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 30 (5–6): 372–395. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2023.2255936.
   Google Scholar
• Rasooli, A., H. Zandi, and C. DeLuca. 2018. “Re-Conceptualizing Classroom Assessment Fairness: A Systematic Meta-Ethnography of Assessment Literature and Beyond.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 56: 164–181. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasooli, A., H. Zandi, and C. DeLuca. 2019. “Conceptualising Fairness in Classroom Assessment: Exploring the Value of Organisational Justice Theory.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 26 (5): 584–611. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1593105.
   Google Scholar
• Rasooli, A., H. Zandi, and C. DeLuca. 2023a. “Measuring Fairness and Justice in the Classroom: A Systematic Review of Instruments’ Validity Evidence.” School Psychology Review 52 (5): 639–664. doi:10.1080/2372966X.2021.2000843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabbagh, C., and N. Resh. 2016. “Unfolding Justice Research in the Realm of Education.” Social Justice Research 29 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1007/s11211-016-0262-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert, T., and O. Feliks. 2019. “Online Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment as a Tool to Enhance Student-Teachers’ Assessment Skills.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (2): 169–185. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1487023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnleitner, P., and C. Kovacs. 2020. “Differences between Students’ and Teachers’ Fairness Perceptions: Exploring the Potential of a Self-Administered Questionnaire to Improve Teachers’ Assessment Practices.” Frontiers in Education 5: 1–17. doi:10.3389/feduc.2020.00017.
   Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J.-W., S. Narciss, and K. Dünnebier. 2010. “Peer Feedback Content and Sender’s Competence Level in Academic Writing Revision Tasks: Are They Critical for Feedback Perceptions and Efficiency?” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 291–303. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svinicki, M. D., and D. L. Schallert. 2016. “Learning through Group Work in the College Classroom: Evaluating the Evidence from an Instructional Goal Perspective.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, edited by M. B. Paulsen, Vol. 31, 513–558. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, R. D. 2013. “Fairness in Classroom Assessment.” In SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment, edited by J. H. McMillan, 125–144. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tumpa, Roksana Jahan, Samer Skaik, Miriam Ham, and Ghulam Chaudhry. 2022. “A Holistic Overview of Studies to Improve Group-Based Assessments in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review.” Sustainability 14 (15): 9638. doi:10.3390/su14159638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, Nyoli, Steven Durning, Ernst Michael Shanahan, and Lambert Schuwirth. 2021. “Fairness in Human Judgement in Assessment: A Hermeneutic Literature Review and Conceptual Framework.” Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice 26 (2): 713–738. doi:10.1007/s10459-020-09976-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Schee, B. A., and T. D. Birrittella. 2021. “Hybrid and Online Peer Group Grading.” Marketing Education Review 31 (4): 275–283. doi:10.1080/10528008.2021.1887746.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderhoven, Ellen,Annelies Raes,Hannelore Montrieux,Tijs Rotsaert, andTammy Schellens. 2015. “What If Pupils Can Assess Their Peers Anonymously? a Quasi-Experimental Study.” Computers & Education 81: 123–132. 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, M. L., and C.-C. Tsai. 2006. “University Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes toward (Online) Peer Assessment.” Higher Education 51 (1): 27–44. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, E. 1992. “Student Attitudes towards Approaches to Learning and Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 17 (1): 45–58. doi:10.1080/0260293920170105.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. M., J. N. Cera Guy, and B. M. Shore. 2019. “High-Achieving Students’ Expectations about What Happens in Classroom Group Work: A Review of Contributing Research.” Roeper Review 41 (3): 156–165. doi:10.1080/02783193.2019.1622165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. J., M. M. Diao, and L. Huang. 2015. “I’m Not Here to Learn How to Mark Someone Else’s Stuff’: An Investigation of an Online Peer-to-Peer Review Workshop Tool.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40 (1): 15–32. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.881980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., L. Johnston, and G. B. Kilic. 2008. “Assessing the Reliability of Self- and Peer Rating in Student Group Work.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (3): 329–340. doi:10.1080/02602930701293181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Bo., and Matthew W. Ohland. 2009. “How to Assign Individualized Scores on a Group Project: An Empirical Evaluation.” Applied Measurement in Education 22 (3): 290–308. doi:10.1080/08957340902984075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, Y., C. D. Schunn, Y. Wang, and F. Zhang. 2017. “Student Attitudes That Predict Participation in Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (5): 800–811. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1409872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar