Publication Cover
Journal of Education for Teaching
International research and pedagogy
Volume 47, 2021 - Issue 3
801
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Designing and Validating a Coding Scheme for Analysis of Teacher Discourse Behaviours in Mathematics Classrooms

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 337-352 | Received 04 Oct 2019, Accepted 03 Feb 2021, Published online: 04 Mar 2021

References

  • Baxter, Juliet A., and Steven Williams. 2010. “Social and analytic scaffolding in middle school mathematics: Managing the dilemma of telling.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 13 (1): 7–26.
  • Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. 2012. Measures of Effective Teaching Project Releases Final Research Report. Seattle, USA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
  • Borko, Hilda, Karen Koellner, Jennifer Jacobs, and Nanette Seago. 2011. “Using video representations of teaching in practice-based professional development programs.” Zdm 43 (1): 175–187.
  • Cazden, C. B. 2001. Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. 2nd.ed ed. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Chi, M. T. H., and M. Menekse. 2015. “Dialogue Patterns in Peer Collaboration that Promote Learning.” In Socializing Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue, edited by L. B. Resnick, C. Asterhan, M. Menekse, and S. N. Clarke, 253–263. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Chi, M. T. H., and R. Wylie. 2014. “The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes.” Educational Psychologist 49 (4): 219–243. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.965823.
  • Desimone, L. M. 2009. “Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures.” Educational Researcher 38 (3): 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140.
  • Dong, L., W. T. Seah, and D. Clarke. 2017. “Pedagogical Tensions in Teacher’s Questioning Practices in the Mathematics Classroom: A Case in Mainland China.” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14 (1): 167–181. doi:10.12973/ejmste/79630.
  • Engle, R. A., and F. C. Conant. 2002. “Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners’ Classroom.” Cognition and Instruction 20 (4): 399–483. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1.
  • Engle, R. A., and R. B. Faux. 2006. “Towards Productive Disciplinary Engagement of Prospective Teachers in Educational Psychology: Comparing Two Methods of Case-based Instruction.” Teaching Educational Psychology 12: 1–22.
  • Grossman, P. L., P. Smagorinsky, and S. Valencia. 1999. “Appropriating Tools for Teaching English: A Theoretical Framework for Research on Learning to Teach.” American Journal of Education 108 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1086/444230.
  • Hill, H. C., D. L. Ball, and S. G. Schilling. 2008. “Unpacking Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Conceptualizing and Measuring Teachers’ Topic-Specific Knowledge of Students.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 39: 372–400.
  • Ho, E. S.-C. 2003. “Accomplishment and Challenges of Hong Kong Education System: What We Have Learned from PISA.” Educational Journal 31 (2): 1–30.
  • Howe, C., and M. Abedin. 2013. “Classroom Dialogue: A Systematic Review across Four Decades of Research.” Cambridge Journal of Education 43 (3): 325–356. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024.
  • Lemke, J. L. 1998. Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Westport: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Leung, F. K. 2001. “In Search of an East Asian Identity in Mathematics Education.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 47 (1): 35–51. doi:10.1023/A:1017936429620.
  • Lotman, Y. M. 1988. “Text within a Text.” Soviet Psychology XXVI (3): 32–51. doi:10.2753/RPO1061-0405260332.
  • Mercer, N. 2000. “Sociocultural Discourse Analysis: Analysing Classroom Talk as a Social Mode of Thinking.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 1 (2): 137–168. doi:10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.137.
  • Mercer, N. 2010. “The Analysis of Classroom Talk: Methods and Methodologies.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1348/000709909X479853.
  • Mercer, N., and C. Howe. 2012. “Explaining the Dialogic Processes of Teaching and Learning: The Value of Sociocultural Theory.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 1 (1): 12–21. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001.
  • Michaels, S., and C. O’Connor. 2015. “Conceptualizing Talk Moves as Tools: Professional Development Approaches for Academically Productive Discussions.” In Socializing Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue, edited by L. B. Resnick, C. S. Asterhan, and S. N. Clarke, 347–362. Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Michaels, S., C. O’Connor, and L. B. Resnick. 2008. “Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic Life.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 27 (4): 283–297. doi:10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1.
  • Ng, O., W. K. Cheng, Y. Ni, and L. Shi. 2020. “How Linguistic Features and Patterns of Discourse Moves Influence Authority Structures in Mathematics Classrooms.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. doi:10.1007/s10857-020-09475-z.
  • Ni, Y., D. Zhou, X. Li, and Q. Li. 2014. “Relations of Instructional Tasks to Classroom Discourse.” Cognition and Instruction 32 (1): 2–42. doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.857319.
  • Ni, Y., G. Ho, J. Cai, A. Cheung, G. Chen, and O. Ng. 2017. “Research Protocol: Teacher Interventions in Engaging Students with Dialogic Classroom Discourse for Rich Learning Opportunity in Mathematics Classrooms.” International Journal of Educational Research 86: 23–35. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.008.
  • O’Connor, C., S. Michaels, and S. Chapin. 2015. “Scaling Down” to Explore the Role of Talk in Learning: From District Intervention to Controlled Classroom Study.” In Socializing Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue, edited by L. B. Resnick, C. S. Asterhan, and S. N. Clarke, 111–126. Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Resnick, L. B., S. Michaels, and C. O’Connor. 2010. “How (Well Structured) Talk Build the Mind.” In From Genes to Context: New Discoveries about Learning from Research and Their Applications, edited by R. Sternbert and D. Preiss, 163–194. New York: Springer.
  • Resnick, L. B., C. S. Asterhan, and S. N. Clarke. Eds. 2015. Socializing Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Rezniskaya, A., and M. Gregory. 2013. “Student Thought and Classroom Language: Examining the Mechanism of Change in Dialogic Teacher.” Educational Psychologist 48 (2): 114–133. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.775898.
  • Smith, J. P. 1996. “Efficacy and Teaching Mathematics by Telling: A Challenge for Reform.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 27 (4): 387–402. doi:10.2307/749874.
  • Smith, M. S., and M. K. Stein. 1998. “Selecting and Creating Mathematical Tasks: From Research to Practice.” Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 3 (5): 344–350. doi:10.5951/MTMS.3.5.0344.
  • Stein, M. K., R. A. Engle, M. S. Smith, and E. K. Hughes. 2008. “Orchestrating Productive Mathematical Discussions: Five Practices for Helping Teachers Move beyond Show and Tell.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning 10 (4): 313–340. doi:10.1080/10986060802229675.
  • Stein, Mary Kay, Janine Remillard, and Margaret S. Smith. 2007. “How curriculum influences student learning.” Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning 1 (1): 319–370.
  • Wagner, D., and B. Herbel-Eisenmann. 2014. “Identifying Authority Structures in Mathematics Classroom Discourse: A Case of a Teacher’s Early Experience in a New Context.” ZDM: International Journal of Mathematics Education 46 (6): 871–882. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0587-x.
  • Walshaw, M., and G. Anthony. 2008. “The Teacher’s Role in Classroom Discourse: A Review of Recent Research into Mathematics Classrooms.” Review of Educational Research 78 (3): 516–551. doi:10.3102/0034654308320292.
  • Xu, L., and D. Clarke. 2019. “Speaking or Not Speaking as a Cultural Practice: Analysis of Mathematics Classroom Discourse in Shanghai, Seoul, and Melbourne.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 102 (1): 127–146. doi:10.1007/s10649-019-09901-x.
  • Yackel, E., and P. Cobb. 1996. “Sociomathematical Norms, Argumentation, and Autonomy in Mathematics.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 27 (4): 458–477. doi:10.2307/749877.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.