2,247
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Internship integrated practitioner research projects foster student teachers’ professional learning and research orientation: a mixed-methods study in initial teacher education

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 456-475 | Received 13 Jul 2020, Accepted 11 May 2021, Published online: 28 May 2021

References

  • Adfal, H. –. W., and K. Spernes. 2018. “Designing and Redesigning Research- Based Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 74: 215–226. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.011.
  • Altrichter, H. 2003. “Forschende Lehrerbildung – Ein Mehrebenenmodell in hochschuldidaktischer Perspektive.” In Forschendes Lernen. Theorie und Praxis einer professionellen LehrerInnenausbildung, edited by A. Obolenski and H. Meyer, 51–163. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
  • Altrichter, H. 2005. “The Role of the “Professional Community” in Action Research.” Educational Action Research 13 (1): 11–25. doi:10.1080/09650790500200274.
  • Altrichter, H., and P. Posch. 2007. Lehrerinnen und Lehrer erforschen ihren Unterricht. 4th ed. Bad Heilbrunn: Waxmann.
  • Altrichter, H., P. Posch, and B. Somekh. 2005. Teachers Investigate Their Work. An Introduction to the Methods of Action Research. New York: Routledge.
  • Altrichter, H., P. Posch, and H. Spann. 2018. Lehrerinnen und Lehrer erforschen ihren Unterricht. 5th ed. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
  • Barnett, R. 2000. “University Knowledge in an Age of Supercomplexitivity.” Higher Education 40 (4): 409–422. doi:10.1023/A:1004159513741.
  • Borko, H., D. Liston, and J. A. Whitcomb. 2007. “Genres of Empirical Research in Teacher Education.” Journal of Teacher Education 58 (1): 311. doi:10.1177/0022487106296220.
  • Bortz, J. 2005. Statistik für Human– Und Sozialwissenschaftler. 6th ed. Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Brandhorst, A., P. Goerigk, A. Schöning, and C. Dempki. 2018. “Zwischen Forschung und Praxis – Das Praxissemester aus der Perspektive von Lehrenden und Fachdidaktiken.” In In Professionalisierungsphasen in der Lehrerbildung, edited by M. Artmann, M. Berendock, P. Herzmann, and A. B. Liegmann, 93–112. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
  • Brenneke, B., N. Pfaff, T. –. B. Schrader, and A. Tervooren. 2018. “Das Praxissemester als Erfahrungsraum Forschenden Lernens? Ambivalenzen in der Aneignung qualitativer Forschungsmethoden.” In In Professionalisierungsphasen in der Lehrerbildung, edited by M. Artmann, M. Berendock, P. Herzmann, and A. B. Liegmann, 38–55. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
  • Brew, A. 2006. Research and Teaching. Beyond the Divide. Houndmills: Palgrave.
  • Brophy, J. 2000. Teaching. Ed. Accessed 22 November 2019. http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/document/teaching–educational–practices–1
  • Burns, A. 2010. Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioner. Suffolk: Taylor and Francis.
  • Coates, M., and J. West–Burnham. 2005. Personalizing Learning. London: Network Continuum.
  • Cochran–Smith, M., and S. –. L. Lytle. 2009. Inquiry as Stance. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Creswell, J., and V. Plano Clark. 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Darling–Hammond, L. 2017. “Teacher Education around the World: What Can We Learn from International Practice?” European Journal of Teacher Education 40 (2): 291–309. doi:10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399.
  • Darling–Hammond, L., R. Chung Wei, and A. Andree. 2010. How High–Achieving Countries Develop Great Teacher. Stanford: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
  • Dicke, T., D. Holzberger, O. Kunina-Habenicht, C. Linninger, F. Schulze-Stocker, and T. Seidel. 2016. “Doppelter Praxisschock auf dem Weg ins Lehramt? Verlauf und potenzielle Einflussfaktoren emotionaler Erschöpfung während des Vorbereitungsdienstes und nach dem Berufseintritt.” Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht 63 (4): S.244–257. doi:10.2378/peu2016.art20d.
  • Entwicklungsverbund Süd–Ost. (2018). “Bachelorstudium im Bereich der Primarstufe.” Accessed 22 November 2019. https://www.phst.at/fileadmin/user_upload/EVSO_Curriculum_Primar_Bachelor_PHSt_Version_Mitteilungsblatt_ab_2018_19.pdf [22 november 2019].
  • Fichten, W. 2010. “Konzepte und Wirkungen forschungsorientierter Lehrerbildung.” In Wirkt Lehrerbildung? Antworten aus der empirischen Forschung, edited by J. Abel and G. Faust, 271–281. Münster: Waxmann.
  • Fichten, W., and H. Meyer. 2014. “Skizze einer Theorie forschenden Lernens in der Lehrer_innenbildung.” In Last oder Lust? Forschung und Lehrer_innenbildung, edited by E. Feyerer, K. Hirschenhauser, and K. Soukup–Altrichter, 11–42. Bad Heilbrunn: Waxmann.
  • Fichten, W., and B. Moschner. 2009. “Forschendes Lernen in der Oldenburger Lehrerbildung.” In Forschendes Lernen im Lehramtstudium, edited by B. Roters, R. Schneider, B. Koch–Priewe, J. Thiele, and J. Wild, 242–270. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
  • Fielding, M. 2001. Taking Education Seriously. London: Routledge.
  • Fuller, F., and O. Bown. 1975. Becoming a Teacher. K. Ryan. Teacher Education (74th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) Pt. II, 25–52. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Goh, L., and K. –. C. Loh. 2013. “Let Them Fish”: Empowering Student–teachers for Professional Development through the Project Approach.” Educational Action Research 21 (2): 202–217. doi:10.1080/09650792.2013.789725.
  • Healy, M. 2005. Reshaping the University: New Relationships between Research, Scholarship and Teaching, Ed. R. Barnett. New York: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.
  • Healy, M., and A. Jenkins. 2009. Developing Undergraduate Research and Inquiry. York: Higher Education Academy.
  • Healy, M., F. Jordan, B. Pell, and C. Short. 2010. “The Research–teaching Nexus: A Case Study of Students’ Awareness, Experiences and Perceptions of Research.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 47 (2): 235–246. doi:10.1080/14703291003718968.
  • Heissenberger, K. 2016. “Personalisierte Professionalisierung durch Praxisforschung im Praktikum.” Erziehung & Unterricht (5–6): 464–472.
  • Heissenberger, K. 2019. Forschendes Lernen im Praktikum. ÖFEB-Kongress. Linz. 19 september 19.
  • Heissenberger, K., and M. Matischek–Jauk. 2019. “It’s Worth It”: Practitioner Research as a Tool of Professional Learning.” Educational Action Research 1–19. doi:10.1080/09650792.2019.1627890.
  • Helmke, A. 2012. Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität. 4th ed. Seelze: Klett–Kallmeyer.
  • Herzmann, P., and A. Liegmann. 2018. “Studienprojekte im Praxissemester.” In Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen Der Lehrerbildung, edited by M. Artmann, M. Berendock, P. Herzmann, and A. B. Liegmann, 74–92. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
  • Hofer, R. 2013. “Forschendes Lernen in der Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung: Widersprüchliche Anforderungen zwischen Forschung und Profession.” Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen– und Lehrerbildung 31 (3): 310–320.
  • Jank, W., and H. Meyer. 2011. Didaktische Modelle. 10th ed. Berlin: Cornelsen.
  • Katsarou, E., and V. Tsafos. 2013. “Student–teachers as Researchers: Towards a Professional Development Orientation in Teacher Education. Possibilities and Limitations in the Greek University.” Educational Action Research 21 (4): 532–548. doi:10.1080/09650792.2013.851611.
  • Katwijk Van, L., A. Berry, E. Jansen, and K. Veen Van. 2019. “It’s Important, but I’m Not Going to Keep Doing It!”: Perceived Purposes, Learning Outcomes, and Values of Pre–service Teacher Research among Educators and Pre–service Teachers.” Teaching and Teacher Education 86: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.022.
  • Kauper, T. 2018. “Hospitationspraktika als Lerngelegenheit? Zum Beitrag von Praktika zur Veränderung berufsbezogener Selbstkonzepte und der Berufswahlsicherheit bei Lehramtsstudierenden.” Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung 32 (4): 269–288. doi:10.1007/s35834-018-0225-8.
  • Keller–Schneider, M., and U. Hericks. 2019. “Beginning Teachers’ Appraisal of Professional Requirements and Implications for Teacher Induction in Switzerland.” Education and Self Development 14 (3): 62–79. doi:10.26907/esd14.3.07.
  • Kitchen, J., and D. Stevens. 2008. “Action Research in Teacher Education.” Action Research 6 (1): 7–28. doi:10.1177/1476750307083716.
  • König, J., S. Tachtsoglou, K. Darge, and M. Lünnemann. 2014. “Zur Nutzung von Praxis: Modellierung und Validierung lernprozessbezogener Tätigkeiten von angehenden Lehrkräften im Rahmen ihrer schulpraktischen Ausbildung.” Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung 4 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1007/s35834-013-0084-2.
  • Kotsopoulos, D., J. Mueller, and D. Buzza. 2012. “Pre–service Teacher Research: An Early Acculturation into a Research Disposition.” Journal of Education and Teaching 38 (1): 21–36. doi:10.1080/02607476.2012.643653.
  • Kuckartz, U. 2014. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. 2nd ed. Weinheim and Basel: Beltz.
  • Levin, B. 2013. “To Know Is Not Enough: Research Knowledge and Its Use.” Review of Education, Accessed 4 May 2021. http://researchimpact.ca/to-know-is-not-enough-research-knowledge-and-its-use/
  • Levin, B., and T. Rock. 2003. “The Effects of Collaborative Action Research on Preservice and Inservice Teacher Partners in Professional Development School.” Journal of Teacher Education 54 (2): 135–149. doi:10.1177/0022487102250287.
  • Mc Quillan, P., M. J. Welch, and J. Barnatt. 2012. “In Search of Coherence: “Inquiring” at Multiple Levels of Teacher Education System.” Educational Action Research 20 (4): 535–551. doi:10.1080/09650792.2012.727640.
  • Medwell, J., and D. Wray. 2014. “Pre–service Teachers Undertaking Classroom Research: Developing Reflection and Inquiry Skill.” Journal of Teacher Education 40 (1): 65–77.
  • Meyer, H. 2003. “Skizze eines Stufenmodells zur Analyse von Forschungskompetenz.” In Forschendes Lernen. Theorie und Praxis einer professionellen LehrerInnenausbildung, edited by A. Obolenski and H. Meyer, 99–116. Münster: Waxmann.
  • Meyer, H. 2016. Was ist guter Unterricht? 11th ed. Berlin: Cornelsen.
  • Munthe, E., and M. Rogne. 2015. “Research Based Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 46: 17–24. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.006.
  • OECD. 2017. Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession. Ed. G. Sonia. Accessed 22 November 2019. http://www.oecd.org/education/pedagogical-knowledge-and-the-changing-nature-of-the-teaching-profession-9789264270695-en.htm
  • OECD. 2018. “The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030.” OECD Education 2030 (Ed.). Accessed 22 November 2019. http://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/student-agency/Student_Agency_for_2030_concept_note.pdf
  • Ostermann, E. 2015. LehrerIn werden im Spannungsfeld subjektiver Erwartungen und objektiver Ausbildungsanforderungen. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
  • Pollmanns, M., S. Kabel, C. Leser, and H. Kminek. 2018. “Krisen in der Professionalisierung. Wie sich Studierende Schulpraktischen Studien forschungsbezogenen Typs zuwenden.” In Professionalisierung in Praxisphasen der Lehrerbildung, edited by M. Artmann, M. Berendock, P. Herzmann, and A. Liegmann, 21–37. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
  • Ryan, T., D. Young, and W. Kraglund–Gauthier. 2017. “Action Research within Pre-Service Teacher Education.” Transformative Dialogues: Teaching and Learning Journal 10 (3): 1–18.
  • Smith, K., and O. Sela. 2005. “Action Research as a Bridge between Pre–service Teacher Education and In–service Professional Development for Students and Teacher Educator.” European Journal of Teacher Education 28 (3): 293–310. doi:10.1080/02619760500269418.
  • Spencer, J., and Molina. 2018. “Mentoring Graduate Students through the Action Research Journey Using Guiding Principle.” Educational Action Research 26 (1): 144–165. doi:10.1080/09650792.2017.1284013.
  • Terhart, E. 2011. “„Lehrberuf und Professionalität. Gewandeltes Begriffsverständnis – Neue Herausforderungen.“.” Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 57: 202–224.
  • Turner, N., B. Wuetherick, and M. Healy. 2008. “International Perspectives on Student Awareness, Experiences and Perceptions of Research.” International Journal for Academic Development 13 (3): 199–211. doi:10.1080/13601440802242333.
  • Ulvik, M. 2014. “Student–teachers Doing Action Research in Their Practicum: Why and How? Educational.” Action Research 22 (4): 518–533. doi:10.1080/09650792.2014.918901.
  • Ulvik, M., and H. Riese. 2016. “Action Research in Pre-service Teacher Education – A Never-ending Story Promoting Professional Development.” Professional Development in Education 42 (3): 441–457. doi:10.1080/19415257.2014.1003089.
  • Ulvik, M., H. Riese, and D. Roness. 2017. “Action Research–connecting Practice and Theory.” Educational Action Research 26 (2): 273–287. doi:10.1080/09650792.2017.1323657.
  • Wenergren, A. –. C. 2016. “Teachers as Learners – With a Little Help from a Critical Friend.” Educational Action Research 22 (2): 260–279. doi:10.1080/09650792.2015.1058170.
  • White, S., E. Hepple, D. Tangen, M. Comelli, A. Alwi, and Z. A. Shaari. 2015. “An Introduction to Education Research Methods: Exploring the Learning Journey of Pre–service Teachers in a Transnational Programme.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 44: 37–41.
  • Wrench, A., and K. Paige. 2019. “Educating Pre-service Teachers: Towards a Critical Inquiry Workforce.” Educational Action Research 28 (1): 1–18.
  • Yan, C. 2017. “‘You Never Know What Research Is unless You’ve Done It!’ Action Research to Promote Collaborative Student–teacher Research.” Educational Action Research 25 (5): 704–719. doi:10.1080/09650792.2016.1245155.