Does the duration of professional development programs influence effects on instruction? An analysis of 174 lessons during a national-scale program

References

• Basma, B., and R. Savage. 2018. “Teacher Professional Development and Student Literacy Growth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Educational Psychology Review 30 (2): 457–481. doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9416-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D., M. A. Maltarich, and J. L. Hendricks. 2018. “Back to Basics with Mixed-Effects Models: Nine Take-Away Points.” Journal of Business and Psychology 33 (1): 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9491-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesen, J., O. Helenius, E. Bergqvist, T. Bergqvist, J. Lithner, T. Palm, and B. Palmberg. 2014. “Developing Mathematical Competence: From the Intended to the Enacted Curriculum.” The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 33: 72–87. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.10.001.
   Google Scholar
• Boesen, J., O. Helenius, and B. Johansson. 2015. “National-Scale Professional Development in Sweden: Theory, Policy, Practice.” ZDM 47 (1): 129–141. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0653-4.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. S., K. C. Irwin, and G. Ritchie. 2001. “Professional Conversations and Professional Growth.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 4 (1): 29–53. doi:10.1023/A:1009935530718.
   Google Scholar
• Brousseau, G. 1997. Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics: Didactique des Mathématiques, 1970-1990. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., K. Jackson, E. Henrick, and T. M. Smith. 2018. Systems for Instructional Improvement: Creating Coherence from the Classroom to the District Office. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Educational Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., M. E. Hyler, and M. Gardner. 2017. Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. 2009. “Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures.” Educational Researcher 38 (3): 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., and M. S. Garet. 2015. “Best Practices in Teachers’ Professional Development in the United States.” Psychology, Society, & Education 7 (3): 252–263. doi:10.25115/psye.v7i3.515.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., J. Heppen, K. Walters, T. Smith, and R. Yang. 2016. Does Content-Focused Teacher Professional Development Work? Findings from Three Institute of Education Sciences Studies. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, R., M. Citkowicz, and R. Williams. 2019. “How Responsive is a Teacher’s Classroom Practice to Intervention? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Field Studies.” Review of Research in Education 43 (1): 106–137. doi:10.3102/0091732X19830634.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., R. G. Duncan, and C. A. Chinn. 2007. “Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006).” Educational Psychologist 42 (2): 99–107. doi:10.1080/00461520701263368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insulander, E., D. Brehmer, and A. Ryve. 2019. “Teacher Agency in Professional Development Programmes: A Case Study of Professional Development Material and Collegial Discussion.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 23: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, R., H. Hill, and D. Corey. 2017. “The Impact of a Professional Development Program on Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching, Instruction, and Student Achievement.” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 10 (2): 379–407. doi:10.1080/19345747.2016.1273411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, V. R., and D. A. Spangler. 2017. “Research on Core Practices in K-12 Mathematics Teaching.” In Compendium for Research in Mathematics Education, edited by J. Cai (edited by), Compendium for Research in Mathematics Education, edited by J. Cai, 766–792. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T. J., and D. O. Staiger. 2012. Gathering Feedback for Teaching: Combining High-Quality Observations with Student Surveys and Achievement Gains. Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. M. 2016. “How Does Professional Development Improve Teaching?” Review of Educational Research 86 (4): 945–980. doi:10.3102/0034654315626800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsten, N., and S. Carlbaum. 2020. “Professional Development for Professional Teachers? The Introduction of Collegial Learning in the Swedish School System.” Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige 25 (1): 7–34. doi:10.15626/pfs25.01.01. [In Swedish.].
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A., D. Blazar, and D. Hogan. 2018. “The Effect of Teacher Coaching on Instruction and Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of the Causal Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 88 (4): 547–588. doi:10.3102/0034654318759268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., and G. G. Koch. 1977. ““The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 33 (1): 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindvall, J., O. Helenius, K. Eriksson, and A. Ryve. 2021. “Impact and Design of a National-Scale Professional Development Program for Mathematics Teachers.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 66 (5): 744–759. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00313831.2021.1910563.
   Google Scholar
• Lindvall, J., O. Helenius, and M. Wiberg. 2018. “Critical Features of Professional Development Programs: Comparing Content Focus and Impact of Two Large-Scale Programs.” Teaching and Teacher Education 70: 121–131. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marder, M., C. Walkington, L. Abraham, K. Allen, P. Arora, M. Daniels, and M. Walker. 2010. The UTeach Observation Protocol (UTOP) Training Guide. Austin, TX: UTeach Natural Sciences, University of Texas Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Munter, C., P. Cobb, and C. Shekell. 2016. “The Role of Program Theory in Evaluation Research: A Consideration of the What Works Clearinghouse Standards in the Case of Mathematics Education.” American Journal of Evaluation 37 (1): 7–26. doi:10.1177/1098214015571122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munter, C., and R. Correnti. 2017. “Examining Relations Between Mathematics teachers’ Instructional Vision and Knowledge and Change in Practice.” American Journal of Education 123 (2): 171–202. doi:10.1086/689928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murchan, D., A. Loxley, and K. Johnston. 2009. “Teacher Learning and Policy Intention: Selected Findings from an Evaluation of a Large‐scale Programme of Professional Development in the Republic of Ireland.” European Journal of Teacher Education 32 (4): 455–471. doi:10.1080/02619760903247292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. Effective Teacher Policies: Insights from PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• O’meara, N., and F. Faulkner. 2022. “Professional Development for Out-Of-Field Post-Primary Teachers of Mathematics: An Analysis of the Impact of Mathematics Specific Pedagogy Training.” Irish Educational Studies 41 (2): 389–408. doi:10.1080/03323315.2021.1899026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Österholm, M., T. Bergqvist, Y. Liljekvist, and J. van Bommel. 2016. Utvärdering Av Matematiklyftets Resultat: Slutrapport [Evaluation of the Results of the Boost for Mathematics. Final Report]. Umeå: Umeå university.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., B. J. Fishman, R. Yamaguchi, and L. P. Gallagher. 2007. “What Makes Professional Development Effective? Strategies That Foster Curriculum Implementation.” American Educational Research Journal 44 (4): 921–958. doi:10.3102/0002831207308221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., N. Shechtman, D. Tatar, S. Hegedus, B. Hopkins, S. Empson, J. Knudsen, and L. P. Gallagher. 2010. “Integration of Technology, Curriculum, and Professional Development for Advancing Middle School Mathematics: Three Large-Scale Studies.” American Educational Research Journal 47 (4): 833–878. doi:10.3102/0002831210367426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz‐primo, M. A., R. J. Shavelson, L. Hamilton, and S. Klein. 2002. “On the Evaluation of Systemic Science Education Reform: Searching for Instructional Sensitivity.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (5): 369–393. doi:10.1002/tea.10027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A., A. Dosalmas, H. Fink, A. Sayavedra, K. Tran, A. Weltman, A. Zarkh, and S. Zuniga-Ruiz. 2019. “Teaching for Robust Understanding with Lesson Study.” In Theory and Practice of Lesson Study in Mathematics: An International Perspective, edited by R. Huang, A. Takahashi, and J. P. da Ponte, 135–159. Cham: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. S., and M. K. Stein. 2011. 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Mathematics Discussions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Van Steenbrugge, H., M. Larsson, E. Insulander, and A. Ryve. 2018. “Curriculum Support for teachers’ Negotiation of Meaning: A Collective Perspective.” In Research on Mathematics Textbooks and teachers’ Resources: Advances and Issues, edited by L. Fan, L. Trouche, C. Qi, S. Rezat, and J. Visnovska, 167–191. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Walkington, C., and M. Marder. 2018. “Using the UTeach Observation Protocol (UTOP) to Understand the Quality of Mathematics Instruction.” ZDM 50 (3): 507–519. doi:10.1007/s11858-018-0923-7.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, A. J., K. S. Yoon, P. Zhu, S. Cronen, and M. S. Garet. 2008. “Experimenting with Teacher Professional Development: Motives and Methods.” Educational Researcher 37 (8): 469–479. doi:10.3102/0013189X08327154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. 2007. “Keeping Learning on Track: Classroom Assessment and the Regulation of Learning.” In Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, edited by F. K. Lester, 1053–1098. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yackel, E., and P. Cobb. 1996. “Sociomathematical Norms, Argumentation, and Autonomy in Mathematics.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 27 (4): 458–477. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.27.4.0458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar