Re-envisioning pre-service teachers’ beliefs and feelings about assessment: the important space of authentic assignments

References

• Allal, L. 2013. “Teachers’ Professional Judgement in Assessment: A Cognitive Act and a Socially Situated Practice.” Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice 20 (1): 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2012.736364.
   Google Scholar
• Atjonen, P., S. Pöntinen, S. Kontkanen, and P. Ruotsalainen. 2022. “In Enhancing Preservice Teachers’ Assessment Literacy: Focus on Knowledge Base, Conceptions of Assessment, and Teacher Learning.” Frontiers in Education 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.891391.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. J. J. 2014. Beautiful Risk of Education. Colorado: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. J. J. 2015. “What Is Education For? On Good Education, Teacher Judgement, and Educational Professionalism.” European Journal of Education 50 (1): 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birenbaum, M., C. DeLuca, L. Earl, M. Heritage, V. Klenowski, A. Looney, K. Smith, H. Timperley, L. Volante, and C. Wyatt-Smith. 2015. “International Trends in the Implementation of Assessment for Learning: Implications for Policy and Practice.” Policy Futures in Education 13 (1): 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210314566733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birt, L., S. Scott, D. Cavers, C. Campbell, and F. Walter. 2016. “Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation?” Qualitative Health Research 26 (13): 1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice 5 (1): 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102.
   Google Scholar
• Bohemia, E., and G. Davison. 2012. “Authentic Learning: The Gift Project.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 17 (2): 49–62. https://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/DATE/article/download/1731/1643.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 1995. Enhancing Learning Through Self-Assessment. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 2022. “Assessment for Future Needs: Emerging Directions for Assessment Change.” Keynote presentation at International Assessment in Higher Education Conference Manchester, June 22-24.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2013. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., V. Clarke, E. Boulton, L. Davey, and C. McEvoy. 2021. “The Online Survey as a Qualitative Research Tool.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 24 (6): 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. 2002. Understanding Deleuze. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, M. F., and D. J. Clandinin. 1999. Shaping a Professional Identity: Stories of Educational Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, C. H. 1902. Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2000. “How Teacher Education Matters.” Journal of Teacher Education 51 (3): 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487100051003002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2006. “Constructing 21st-Century Teacher Education.” Journal of Teacher Education 57 (3): 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, C., A. Kington, G. Stobart, and P. Sammons. 2006. “The Personal and Professional Selves of Teachers: Stable and Unstable Identities.” British Educational Research Journal 32 (4): 601–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920600775316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dellinger, A. B., J. J. Bobbett, D. F. Olivier, and C. D. Ellett. 2008. “Measuring teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs: Development and Use of the TEBS-Self.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24 (3): 751–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca, C., T. Chavez, A. Bellara, and C. Cao. 2013. “Pedagogies for Pre-Service Assessment Education: Supporting Teacher Candidates. Assessment Literacy Development.” The Teacher Educator 48 (2): 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2012.760024.
   Google Scholar
• Douwe, B., P. C. Meijer, and N. Verloop. 2004. “Reconsidering Research on teachers’ Professional Identity.” Teaching and Teacher Education 20 (2): 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, A., M. Conroy Johnson, E. Donlon, E. McDonald, and P. J. Sexton. 2021. “The Role of the Teacher As Assessor: Developing Student Teachers’ Assessment Identity.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 46 (12): 52–68. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n12.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, A., Z. Lysaght, and M. O’Leary. 2021. “High Stakes Assessment Policy Implementation in the Time of COVID-19: The Case of Calculated Grades in Ireland.” Irish Educational Studies 40 (2): 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1916565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., M. Kääriäinen, O. Kanste, T. Pölkki, K. Utriainen, and H. Kyngäs. 2014. “Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness.” SAGE Open 4 (1): 2158244014522633. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633.
   Google Scholar
• Enda, D., M. Conroy Johnson, A. Doyle, E. McDonald, and P. J. Sexton. 2022. “Presence Accounted For? Student-Teachers Establishing and Experiencing Presence in Synchronous Online Teaching Environments.” Irish Educational Studies 41 (1): 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.2022520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. 1959. Identity and the Life Cycle. New York: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gayo-Avello, D., and H. Fernández-Cuervo. 2003. “Online Self-Assessment As a Learning Method.” In Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies 254–255. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2003.1215070.
   Google Scholar
• Herppich, S., A.-K. Praetorius, N. Forster, I. Glogger-Frey, K. Karst, D. Leutner, L. Behrmann, et al. 2018. “Teachers’ Assessment Competence: Integrating Knowledge-, Process-, and Product-Oriented Approaches into a Competence-Oriented Conceptual Model.” Teaching and Teacher Education 76:181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T. N. 2018. “Classroom Assessment, Pedagogy and Learning – Twenty Years After Black and Wiliam 1998.” Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice 25 (6): 545–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1553695.
   Google Scholar
• Jenlink, P. M., Ed. 2021. Understanding Teacher Identity: The Complexities of Forming an Identity As Professional Teacher. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Kelchtermans, G. 2009. “Who I Am in How I Teach Is the Message: Self-Understanding, Vulnerability and Reflection.” Teachers & Teaching 15 (2): 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, P. T. 2002. “The Achilles’ Heel of Quality: The Assessment of Student Learning.” Quality in Higher Education 8 (1): 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320220127506.
   Google Scholar
• Lefever, S., M. Dal, and Á. Matthíasdóttir. 2007. “Online Data Collection in Academic Research: Advantages and Limitations.” British Journal of Educational Technology 38 (4): 574–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00638.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobe, B. 2017. “Best Practices for Synchronous Online Focus Groups.” In A New Era in Focus Group Research: Challenges, Innovation and Practice, edited by R. S. Barbour and D. L. Morgan, 227–250. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58614-8_11.
   Google Scholar
• Looney, A., J. Cumming, F. van Der Kleij, and K. Harris. 2018. “Reconceptualising the Role of Teachers As Assessors: Teacher Assessment Identity.” Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice 25 (5): 442–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1268090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutovac, S., and M. Assunção Flores. 2022. “Conceptions of Assessment in Pre-Service Teachers’ Narratives of Students’ Failure.” Cambridge Journal of Education 52 (1): 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764x.2021.1935736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysaght, Z., and M. O’Leary. 2013. “An Instrument to Audit Teachers’ Use of Assessment for Learning.” Irish Educational Studies 32 (2): 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2013.784636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPhail, A., J. Halbert, and H. O’Neill. 2018. “The Development of Assessment Policy in Ireland: A Story of Junior Cycle Reform.” Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice 25 (3): 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2018.1441125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPhail, C., N. Khoza, L. Abler, and M. Ranganathan. 2016. “Process Guidelines for Establishing Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Studies.” Qualitative Research 16 (2): 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115577012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschall, G. 2022. “The Role of Teacher Identity in Teacher Self-Efficacy Development: The Case of Katie.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 25 (6): 725–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09515-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mockler, N. 2011. “Beyond ‘What Works’: Understanding Teacher Identity As a Practical and Political Tool.” Teachers & Teaching 17 (5): 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.602059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, J. 2005. “The Authentic Assessment Toolbox: Enhancing Student Learning Through Online Faculty Development.” Journal of Online Learning and Teaching/merlot 1 (1): 1–7. http://jolt.merlot.org/documents/VOL1No1mueller.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mutton, T. 2020. “Teacher Education and Covid-19: Responses and Opportunities for New Pedagogical Initiatives.” Journal of Education for Teaching 46 (4): 439–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1805189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCCA. 2012. Framework for Junior Cycle. Dublin: NCCA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA. 2015. Framework for Junior Cycle. Dublin: NCCA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA. 2019. “Senior Cycle Review: Draft Public Consultation Report”. Dublin: NCCA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA. 2021. Reporting. https://ncca.ie/en/junior-cycle/assessment-and-reporting/reporting/.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2020. Implementing Education Policies Education in Ireland: An OECD Assessment of the Senior Cycle Review. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/636bc6c1-en.
   Google Scholar
• Pishgadam, R., J. Golzar, and M. A. Miri. 2022. “A New Conceptual Framework for Teacher Identity Development.” Frontiers in Psychology 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard, A. edited by 2010. “Professionalism and Pedagogy: A Contemporary Opportunity.” A Commentary by the Teaching and Learning Research Programme and the General Teaching Council for England, London:TLRP. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4160558.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M., B. O’Donovan, C. Rust, and J. Carroll. 2008. “Assessment Standards: A Manifesto for Change.” Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching 2 (3): 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, J., and B. Crossouard. 2010. “Challenging Formative Assessment: Disciplinary Spaces and Identities.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903512891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punya, M., and M. J. Koehler. 2006. “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge.” Teachers College Record 108 (6): 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D. H., and A. Meyer. 2002. Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED466086.
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. 1967. “The Methodology of Evaluation.” In Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, edited by R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné, and M. Scriven, 39–83. Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. 2016. “Functions of Assessment in Teacher Education.” In International Handbook of Teacher Education: Volume 2, edited by J. Loughran and M. L. Hamilton, 405–428. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0369-1_12.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmayr, R., A. Meißner, A. Weidinger, and L. Wirthwein. 2014. “Academic Achievement.” Oxford Bibliographies. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0108.
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. J. 1988. “Revitalizing Classroom Assessment: The Highest Instructional Priority.” Phi Delta Kappan 69 (5): 363–368. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20403636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Teaching Council. 2020a. Céim: Standards for Initial Teacher Education. Maynooth: The Teaching Council. https://www.teachingcouncil.ie/en/news-events/latest-news/ceim-standards-for-initial-teacher-education.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Teaching Council. 2020b. Guidance Note for School Placement 2020-2021. Maynooth: The Teaching Council. https://www.teachingcouncil.ie/en/news-events/latest-news/10-08-2020-guidance-note-for-school-placement-2020_.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L., and C. Beauchamp. 2007. “Learning to Live Well As Teachers in a Changing World: Insights into Developing a Professional Identity in Teacher Education.” The Journal of Educational Thought 41 (3): 229–243. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23765520.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., A. Christensen, H. Z. Kackar-Cam, S. M. Fulmer, and M. Trucano. 2018. “The Development of Professional Learning Communities and Their Teacher Leaders: An Activity Systems Analysis.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 27 (1): 49–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1381962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarroel, V., S. Bloxham, D. Bruna, C. Bruna, and C. Herrera-Seda. 2018. “Authentic Assessment: Creating a Blueprint for Course Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (5): 840–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1986. Thought and Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, R., E. Goodyear-Grant, and A. Bittner. 2021. “Harnessing Technologies in Focus Group Research.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423921000226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, I., and M. McSharry. 2021. “Pre-Service Teachers’ Experiences of Pandemic Related School Closures: Anti-Structure, Liminality and Communitas.” Irish Educational Studies 40 (2): 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1916562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yambi, T., and C. Yambi. 2020. “Assessment and Evaluation in Education.” Accessed June 3, 2022. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342918149_ASSESSMENT_AND_EVALUATION_IN_EDUCATION.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A.-M., A. MacPhail, and D. Tannehill. 2022. “Teacher Educators’ Engagement with School-Based Assessments Across Irish Teacher Education Programmes.” Irish Educational Studies 43 (2): 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2022.2061562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yueting, X., and G. T. L. Brown. 2016. “Teacher Assessment Literacy in Practice: A Reconceptualization.” Teaching and Teacher Education 58:149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar