References
- Blumenstyk, G. 2016. For-Profit Colleges May Be Down, but Don’t Count Them Out. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Accessed, January 6. https://chronicle.com/article/For-Profit-Colleges-May-Be/234808.
- Brown, S. R. 1980. Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Escalada, L. T., and J. K. Moeller. 2006. “The Challenges of Designing and Implementing Effective Professional Development for Out-of-Field High School Physics Teachers.” AIP Conference Proceedings 818 (1): 11–14. doi:10.1063/1.2177011.
- Fies, C., and J. Marshall. 2006. “Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Science Education & Technology 15 (1): 101–109.10.1007/s10956-006-0360-1
- Gire, E., E. Price, and B. Jones. 2007. “Characterizing the Epistemological Development of Physics majors.” AIP Conference Proceedings 883 (1): 65–68. doi:10.1063/1.2508692.
- Halloun, I., and D. Hestenes. 1998. “Interpreting VASS Dimensions and Profiles for Physics Students.” Science and Education 7 (6): 553–577.10.1023/A:1008645410992
- Lasry, N. 2008. “Clickers or Flashcards: Is There Really a Difference?” The Physics Teacher 46 (4): 242–244. doi:10.1119/1.2895678.
- Lising, L., and A. Elby. 2005. “The Impact of Epistemology on Learning: A Case Study from Introductory Physics.” American Journal of Physics 73 (4): 372–382.
- McKeown, B., and D. Thomas. 1988. Q Methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781412985512
- Mestre, J. P., R. Dufresne, W. J. Gerace, P. T. Hardiman, and J. S. Touger. 1993. “Promoting Skilled Problem-Solving Behavior Among Beginning Physics Students.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30 (3): 303.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
- National Center for Education Statistics. 2014. Enrollment in Distance Education Courses, by State. Fall 2012. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2014023.
- Newman, I., and S. Ramlo. 2010. “Using Q Methodology and Q Factor Analysis to Facilitate Mixed Methods Research.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. 2nd ed, edited by A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 505–530. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Perkins, K. K., W. K. Adams, S. J. Pollock, N. D. Finkelstein, and C. E. Wieman. 2005. “Correlating Student Beliefs with Student Learning Using the Colorado Learning Attitudes About Science Survey.” AIP Conference Proceedings 790 (1): 61–64. doi:10.1063/1.2084701.
- Perkins, K. K., W. Adams, M. Dubson, N. Finkelstein, S. Reid, C. Wieman, and R. LeMaster. 2006. “PhET: Interactive Simulations for Teaching and Learning Physics.” The Physics Teacher 44 (1): 18–23. doi:10.1119/1.2150754.
- Ramlo, S. 2008a. “Determining the Various Perspectives and Consensus Within a Classroom Using Q Methodology.” Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings 1064 (1): 179–182.
- Ramlo, S. 2008b. “Student Perspectives on Learning Physics and Their Relationship with Learning Force and Motion Concepts: A Study Using Q Methodology.” Human Subjectivity 2 (1): 73–90.
- Ramlo, S. 2012a. “Inservice Science Teachers’ Views of a Professional Development Workshop and their Learning of Force and Motion Concepts.” Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (7): 928–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.04.00210.1016/j.tate.2012.04.002
- Ramlo, S. 2012b. “Determining Faculty and Student Views: Applications of Q Methodology in Higher Education.” Journal of Research in Education 22 (1): 86–106. https://www.eeraonline.org/journal/files/v22/JRE_v22n1_Article_5_Ramlo.pdf.
- Ramlo, S. 2015a. “Theoretical Significance in Q Methodology: A Qualitative Approach to a Mixed Method.” Research in the Schools 22 (1): 68–81.
- Ramlo, S. 2015b. “Student Views About a Flipped Physics Course: A Tool for Program Evaluation and Improvement.” Research in the Schools 22 (1): 44–54.
- Ramlo, S. 2015c. “Q Methodology as a Tool for Program Assessment.” Mid-Western Educational Researcher 27 (2): 207–223. https://www.mwera.org/MWER/volumes/v27/issue3/v27n3-Ramlo-FEATURE-ARTICLE.pdf.
- Ramlo, S. 2016a. “Mixed Method Lessons Learned From 80 Years of Q Methodology.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 10: 28–45. doi:10.1177/1558689815610998. https://mmr.sagepub.com/content/10/1/28.full.pdf+html.
- Ramlo, S. 2016b. “Students’ Views About Potentially Offering Physics Courses Online.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 25 (3): 489–496. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9608-6. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10956-016-9608-6.
- Ramlo, S., and I. Newman. 2011. “Q methodology and its Position in the Mixed Methods Continuum.” Operant Subjectivity: The International Journal of Q Methodology 34 (3): 173–192.
- Ramlo, S., D. McConnell, Z. Duan, and F. Moore. 2008. “Evaluating an Inquiry-based Bioinformatics Course Using Q Methodology.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 17 (3): 219–225. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9090-x. https://www.springerlink.com/content/n0tq77wjg013402v/.
- Schmolck, P. 2002. PQMethod Manual Mirror. ( Unpublished manuscript). Accessed, April 29, 2004. https://www.rz.unibw-muenchen.de/~p41bsmk/qmethod/.
- Sokoloff, D. R., R. K. Thornton, and P. W. Laws. 2004. RealTime Physics: Active Learning Laboratories. New York: Wiley.
- Stephenson, W. 1953. The Study of Behavior: Q-Technique and its Methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Stowell, J. R., and J. M. Nelson. 2007. “Benefits of Electronic Audience Response Systems on Student Participation, Learning, and Emotion.” Teaching of Psychology 34 (4): 253.10.1080/00986280701700391
- Straumsheim, C. 2016. Remaining Residential: Study Suggests Acceptance of Online Education Still Lags Among High School Students. Inside Higher Education. Accessed, February 17. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/02/17/study-suggests-high-school-students-hold-negative-views-online-education?utm_content=buffer7c68f&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=IHEbuffer
- Thornton, R. K. 1993. “Changing the Physics Laboratory: Using Technology and New Approaches to Learning to Create an Experimental Environment for Learning Physics Concepts.” Proceedings of the Europhysics Conference on the Role of Experiment in Physics Education, Skofja Loka, Slovenia, 12–31.
- Thornton, R. K., and D. R. Sokoloff. 1998. “Assessing Student Learning of Newton’s Laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula.” American Journal of Physics 66 (4): 338–352.
- U.S. News & World Report. 2014. New Government Data Sheds Light on Online Learners. Accessed, June 12. https://www.usnews.com/education/online-education/articles/2014/06/12/new-government-data-sheds-light-on-online-learners
- U.S. News & World Report. 2015. U.S. News Ranks Best Online Programs. Accessed, January 7. https://www.usnews.com/education/online-education/articles/us-news-ranks-best-online-programs
- Wieman, C. E., W. K. Adams, and K. K. Perkins. 2008. “PhET: Simulations that Enhance Learning.” Science 332 (5902): 682–683.