Teacher facilitating of group learning in science with digital technology and insights into students’ agency in learning to learn

References

• Adey, P., and M. Shayer. 1993. “An Exploration of Long-Term Far-Transfer Effects following an Extended Intervention Program in the High School Science Curriculum.” Cognition and Instruction 11 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1101_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. M., and J. Heritage. 1999. “Transcript Notation - Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis.” Aphasiology 13 (4–5): 243–249. doi:10.1080/026870399402073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, J., and R White. (1996). Metacognitive strategies in the classroom. In Treagust, D. F. Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics, edited by D. F. Treagust, 190–200. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beeth, M. E. 1998. “Teaching for Conceptual Change: Using Status as a Metacognitive Tool.” Science Education 82 (3): 343–356. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., R. McCormick, M. James, and D. Pedder. 2006. “Learning How to Learn and Assessment for Learning: A Theoretical Inquiry.” Research Papers in Education 21 (2): 119–132. doi:10.1080/02671520600615612.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. N., I. Howley, L. Resnick, and C. Penstein Rosé. 2016. “Student Agency to Participate in Dialogic Science Discussions.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 10: 27–39. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claxton, G. 2007. “Expanding Young People’s Capacity to Learn.” British Journal of Educational Studies 55 (2): 115–134. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00369.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claxton, G. 2013. What’s the Point of School?: Rediscovering the Heart of Education. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2012. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Derry, S. J., R. D. Pea, B. Barron, R. A. Engle, F. Erickson, R. Goldman, … M. G. Sherin. 2010. “Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 19 (1): 3–53. doi:10.1080/10508400903452884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. 2005. “Let’s Get beyond Community and Practice: The Many Meanings of Learning by Participating.” Curriculum Journal 16 (1): 49–65. doi:10.1080/0958517042000336809.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. 2015. “Designing Tasks Which Engage Learners with Knowledge.” In Designing Tasks in Secondary Education: Enhancing Subject Understanding and Student Engagement, edited by I. Thompson, 13–27. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. 2017. “Cultural-Historical Approaches to Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Teaching to Support Student Agency.” In Theorising Learning to Teach in Higher Education, edited by B. Leibowitz, V. Bozalek, and P. Kahn, 124–138. Taylor and Francis: London.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2013. Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Galperin, P. Y. 2002. Lectures in Psychology. Moscow: Knizhnyy Dom Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York, NY: Basic books. http://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/geertz.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Greiffenhagen, C. 2012. “Making Rounds: The Routine Work of the Teacher during Collaborative Learning with Computers.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 7 (1): 11–42. doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9134-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunstone, R., and I. Mitchell. 1998. “Metacognition and Conceptual Change.” In (2005). Teaching Science for Understanding: A Human Constructivist View, edited by J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, and J. D. Novak, 134–163. London: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haenen, J. 2001. “Outlining the Teaching-Learning Process: Piotr Gal’perin’s Contribution.” Learning and Instruction 11 (2): 157–170. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00020-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, K., L. Lipponen, and S. Järvelä. 2002. “Epistemology of Inquiry and Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.” Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2: 129–156.
   Google Scholar
• Hannisdal, M., and J. Haugan. 2008. Eureka! 10.  Oslo: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• James, M., P. Black, P. Carmichael,M. -J. Drummond, A. Fox, J. MacBeath, et al. (2007). Improving Learning how to Learn in Classrooms, Schools and Networks. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• James, M., and R. McCormick. 2009. “Teachers Learning How to Learn.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (7): 973–982. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., and A. Henderson. 1995. “Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 4 (1): 39–103. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorde, D. M. 2003. Virtual Environments in Science: Viten.No. Vol. 17. Oslo: Forsknings- og kompetansenettverk for IT i utdanning, Universitetet i Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Lazonder, A. W., and R. Harmsen. 2016. “Meta-Analysis of Inquiry-Based Learning: Effects of Guidance.” Review of Educational Research 86 (3): 681–718. doi:10.3102/0034654315627366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linell, P. 1998. Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Vol. 3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkitalo, Å. 2016. “On the Notion of Agency in Studies of Interaction and Learning.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 10: 64–67. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. 1994. “Cognitive and Metacognitive Aspects in Conceptual Change by Analogy.” Instructional Science 22 (3): 157–187. doi:10.1007/BF00892241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer. 2010. “The Analysis of Classroom Talk: Methods and Methodologies.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1348/000709909X479853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. 2002. “The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing.” Theory into Practice 41 (4): 219–225. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajala, A., J. Martin, and K. Kumpulainen. 2016. “Agency and Learning: Researching Agency in Educational Interactions.” Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction 10: 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, D. J., J. Zhang, and Q. Chen. 2003. “Supporting Scientific Discovery Learning in a Simulation Environment.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19 (1): 9–20. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00002.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J. 1992. “Learning by Collaborating: Convergent Conceptual Change.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 2 (3): 235–276. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0203_1.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., K. J. Crippen, and K. Hartley. 2006. “Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning.” Research in Science Education 36 (1–2): 111–139. doi:10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. 2011. Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates. London, UK: A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., S. M. Gamlem, A. K. Sandal, and K. S. Engelsen. 2016. “Educating for the Future: A Conceptual Framework of Responsive Pedagogy.” Cogent Education 3 (1): 1227021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetsenko, A., and I. Arievitch. 2002. “Teaching, Learning, and Development: A post-Vygotskian Perspective.” In Learning for Life in the 21st Century: Sociocultural Perspectives on the Future of Education edited by G. Wells, and G. Claxton, 84–96. London: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753545.ch7
   Google Scholar
• Strømme, T. A., and A. Furberg. 2015. “Exploring Teacher Intervention in the Intersection of Digital Resources, Peer Collaboration, and Instructional Design.” Science Education 99 (5): 837–862. doi:10.1002/sce.21181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urhahne, D., S. Schanze, T. Bell, A. Mansfield, and J. Holmes. 2010. “Role of the Teacher in Computer‐Supported Collaborative Inquiry Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (2): 221–243. doi:10.1080/09500690802516967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, A., J. Janssen, G. Erkens, and M. Brekelmans. 2013. “Teacher Interventions in a Synchronous, Co-Located CSCL Setting: Analyzing Focus, Means, and Temporality.” Computers in Human Behavior 29 (4): 1377–1386. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V., B. H. Van Hout-Wolters, and P. Afflerbach. 2006. “Metacognition and Learning: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations.” Metacognition and Learning 1 (1): 3–14. doi:10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0.
   Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V., R. Kok, and A. W. Blöte. 2005. “The Relation between Intellectual and Metacognitive Skills in Early Adolescence.” Instructional Science 33 (3): 193–211. doi:10.1007/s11251-004-2274-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1978. “Interaction between Learning and Development.” Readings on the Development of Children 23 (3): 34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1980. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1986. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R., and N. Mercer. 1996. “Computers and Reasoning through Talk in the Classroom.” Language and Education 10 (1): 47–64. doi:10.1080/09500789608666700.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. 1991. Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. 2006. “Formative Assessment: Getting the Focus Right.” Educational Assessment 11 (3–4): 283–289.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H. 1997. “Experimenting to Bootstrap Self-Regulated Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology 89 (3): 397. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., and N. E. Perry. 2000. “Measuring Self-Regulated Learning.” In Handbook of Self-Regulation, edited by M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, 531–566. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 2002. “Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview.” Theory into Practice 41 (2): 64–70. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 2008. “Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects.” American Educational Research Journal 45 (1): 166–183. doi:10.3102/0002831207312909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar