711
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The effects of combining simulations and laboratory experiments on Zimbabwean students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Andrade, H., and A. Valtcheva. 2009. “Promoting Learning and Achievement through Self-Assessment.” Theory Into Practice 48: 1. doi:10.1080/00405840802577510.
  • Bajpai, M. 2013. “Developing Concepts in Physics through Virtual Lab Experiment: An Effectiveness Study.” TechnoLearn: an International Journal of Educational Technology 3 (1): 43–50.
  • Bayrak, B., U. Kanli, and S. K. Ingec. 2007. “To Compare the Effects of Computer Based Learning and the Laboratory Based Learning on Students’ Achievement regarding Electric Circuits.” Online Submission 6 (1): 15–24.  https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1102463.pdf
  • Caleon, I., and R. Subramaniam. 2010. “Development and Application of a Three‐Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Secondary Students’ Understanding of Waves.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (7): 939–961. doi:10.1080/09500690902890130.
  • Cataloglu. 2001. Development and Validation of an Achievement Test in Introductory Quantum Mechanics: The Quantum Mechanics Visualization Instrument (QMVI). The Pennsylvania State University. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/5937
  • Clément, P. 2003. “Situated Conceptions and Obstacles. The Example of Digestion/Excretion.” In Science Education Research in the Knowledge-Based Society, edited by Psillos D, Kariotoglou P, Tselfes V, Hatzikraniotis E, Fassoulopoulos G, and Kallery M, 89–97. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Driver, R., A. Squires, P. Rushworth, and V. Wood-Robinson, eds. 1994. “Electricity.” In Making Sense of Secondary Science: Research into Children’s Ideas, 117–125. London, UK and New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Duit, R., and D. F. Treagust. 2003. “Conceptual Change: A Powerful Framework for Improving Science Teaching and Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (6): 671–688. doi:10.1080/09500690305016.
  • Ekici, F., E. Ekici, and F. Aydin. 2007. “Utility of Concept Cartoons in Diagnosing and Overcoming Misconceptions Related to Photosynthesis.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2 (4): 111–124.
  • Engelhardt, P. V., and R. J. Beichner. 2004. “Students’ Understanding of Direct Current Resistive Electrical Circuits.” American Journal of Physics 72 (1): 98–115. doi:10.1119/1.1614813.
  • Farrokhnia, M. R., and A. Esmailpour. 2010. “A Study on the Impact of Real, Virtual and Comprehensive Experimenting on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of DC Electric Circuits and Their Skills in Undergraduate Electricity Laboratory.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2): 5474–5482. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.893.
  • Finkelstein, N. D., W. K. Adams, C. J. Keller, P. B. Kohl, K. K. Perkins, N. S. Podolefsky, S. Reid, and R. LeMaster. 2005a. “When Learning about the Real World Is Better Done Virtually: A Study of Substituting Computer Simulations for Laboratory Equipment.” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 1 (1): 010103. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.1.010103.
  • Finkelstein, N. D., K. K. Perkins, W. Adams, P. Kohl, and N. Podolefsky. 2005b. In Can Computer Simulations Replace Real Equipment in Undergraduate Laboratories?, edited by Marx. J, Heron. P and Franklin. S, Vol. 790, 101–104. Melville, NY: Iop Institute of Physics Publishing. https://aip.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/1.2084711
  • Hammer, D. 1996. “More than Misconceptions: Multiple Perspectives on Student Knowledge and Reasoning, and an Appropriate Role for Education Research.” American Journal of Physics 64 (10): 1316–1325. doi:10.1119/1.18376.
  • Hennessy, S., D. Harrison, and L. Wamakote. 2010. “Teacher Factors Influencing Classroom Use of ICT in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Itupale Online Journal of African Studies 2 (1): 39–54.
  • Hussain, N. H., L. A. Latiff, and N. Yahaya. 2012. “Alternative Conception about Open and Short Circuit Concepts.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 56: 466–473. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.678.
  • Jaakkola, T., S. Nurmi, and K. Veermans. 2011. “A Comparison of Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuits in Simulation Only and Simulation‐Laboratory Contexts.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (1): 71–93. doi:10.1002/tea.20386.
  • Jaakkola, T., and S. Nurmi. 2008. “Fostering Elementary School Students’ Understanding of Simple Electricity by Combining Simulation and Laboratory Activities.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24 (4): 271–283. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00259.x.
  • Jenkins, E. W. 2000. “Constructivism in School Science Education: Powerful Model or the Most Dangerous Intellectual Tendency?” Science & Education 9 (6): 599–610. doi:10.1023/A:1008778120803.
  • Kirschner, P., and W. Huisman. 1998. “‘Dry Laboratories’ in Science Education; Computer‐Based Practical Work.” International Journal of Science Education 20 (6): 665–682. doi:10.1080/0950069980200605.
  • Kollöffel, B., and T. Jong. 2013. “Conceptual Understanding of Electrical Circuits in Secondary Vocational Engineering Education: Combining Traditional Instruction with Inquiry Learning in a Virtual Lab.” Journal of Engineering Education 102 (3): 375–393. doi:10.1002/jee.v102.3.
  • Konyana, S., and E. Konyana. 2013. “Computerisation of Rural Schools in Zimbabwe: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Development (The Case of Chipinge District).” African Journal of Teacher Education 3: 2. doi:10.21083/ajote.v3i2.2156.
  • Layard, R. 2009. The 3rd OECD World Forum on ‘Statistics, Knowledge and Policy’ Charting Progress, Building Visions, Improving Life. OECD, Busan. Korea.
  • Lee, Y., and N. Law. 2001. “Explorations in Promoting Conceptual Change in Electrical Concepts via Ontological Category Shift.” International Journal of Science Education 23 (2): 111–149. doi:10.1080/09500690119851.
  • Malik, S. K., and F. Khurshed. 2011. “A Proposed Constructive Instructional Design (CID) for Teaching of Social Studies at Elementary Level.” European Journal of Social Sciences 23 (4): 531–552.
  • Marshall, J. A., and E. S. Young. 2006. “Preservice Teachers’ Theory Development in Physical and Simulated Environments.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43 (9): 907–937. doi:10.1002/tea.20124.
  • McDermott, L. C., and P. S. Shaffer. 1992. “Research as a Guide for Curriculum Development: An Example from Introductory Electricity. Part I: Investigation of Student Understanding.” American Journal of Physics 60 (11): 994–1003. doi:10.1119/1.17003.
  • McMillan, J. H., and J. Hearn. 2008. “Student Self-Assessment: The Key to Stronger Student Motivation and Higher Achievement.” Educational Horizons 87 (1): 40–49. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ815370.pdf
  • Ozgur, S. 2013. “The Persistence of Misconceptions about the Human Blood Circulatory System among Students in Different Grade Levels.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 8 (2): 255–268. doi:10.12973/ijese.2013.206a.
  • Peşman, H., and A. Eryılmaz. 2010. “Development of a Three-Tier Test to Assess Misconceptions about Simple Electric Circuits.” The Journal of Educational Research 103 (3): 208–222. doi:10.1080/00220670903383002.
  • Posner, G. J., K. A. Strike, P. W. Hewson, and W. A. Gertzog. 1982. “Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change.” Science Education 66: 211–227. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.
  • Rytting, M. C. 2016. Comparison of Simulation and Hands-On Labs in Helping High School Students Learn Physics Concepts. Provo, UT: School of Technology; Brigham Young University. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7132&context=etd
  • Sabah, S. A. 2007. “Developing Two-Tiered Instrument with Confidence Levels for Assessing Students’ Conception of Direct Current Circuits.” In Department of Learning and Instruction, Faculty of the Graduate School. Buffalo edited by Liu, Xiufeng, 68 (12), 148. New York: State University of New York. https://ubir.buffalo.edu/xmlui/handle/10477/42681
  • Smetana, L. K., and R. L. Bell. 2012. “Computer Simulations to Support Science Instruction and Learning: A Critical Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (9): 1337–1370. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.605182.
  • Stangroom, J. 2018. “Social Science Statistics.” https://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/
  • Suchai, N., and R. N. Thasaneeya. 2012. Students’ Understanding about the Brightness of Light Bulbs Connected in DC Electric Circuits. In, 951. Engineers Australia. https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=237908333039573;res=IELENG
  • Taşlıdere, E. 2013. “Effect of Conceptual Change Oriented Instruction on Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Decreasing Their Misconceptions in DC Electric Circuits.” Creative Education 4: 273. doi:10.4236/ce.2013.44041.
  • Treagust, D. F., and R. Duit. 2008. “Conceptual Change: A Discussion of Theoretical, Methodological and Practical Challenges for Science Education.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 3 (2): 297–328. doi:10.1007/s11422-008-9090-4.
  • Turgut, Ü., F. Gürbüz, and G. Turgut. 2011. “An Investigation 10th Grade Students’ Misconceptions about Electric Current.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 15: 1965–1971. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.036.
  • Unlu, Z. K., and I. Dokme. 2011. “The Effect of Combining Analogy-Based Simulation and Laboratory Activities on Turkish Elementary School Students’ Understanding of Simple Electric Circuits.” Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET 10 (4): 320–329.
  • Zacharia, Z. C. 2007. “Comparing and Combining Real and Virtual Experimentation: An Effort to Enhance Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuits.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23 (2): 120–132. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00215.x.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., and D. H. Schunk. 2001. Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspective. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-06817-000

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.