Understanding the role of construal level in time-restriction

References

• Abe, J.A. 2004. Shame, guilt, and personality judgment. Journal of Research in Personality 38, no. 2: 85–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, P., and R. Vaidyanathan. 2003. Use it or lose it: Purchase acceleration effects of time-limited promotions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 2, no. 4: 393–403.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal, N., and A. Duhachek. 2010. Emotional compatibility and the effectiveness of antidrinking messages: A defensive processing perspective on shame and guilt. Journal of Marketing Research 47, no. 2: 263–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, N., and D. Maheswaran. 2005. The effects of self-construal and commitment on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 31, no. 4: 841–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek, T.H., and S. Yoon. 2017. Guilt and shame: Environmental message framing effects. Journal of Advertising 46, no. 3: 440–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Anan, Y., N. Liberman, and Y. Trope. 2006. The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 135, no. 4: 609–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben Zur, H., and S.J. Breznitz. 1981. The effect of time pressure on risky choice behavior. Acta Psychologica 47, no. 2: 89–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga, J.N., M.B. Ferreira, and S.J. Sherman. 2015. The effects of construal level on heuristic reasoning: The case of representativeness and availability. Decision 2, no. 3: 216–27.
   Google Scholar
• Brannon, L.A., and T.C. Brock. 2001. Limiting time for responding enhances behavior corresponding to the merits of compliance appeals: Refutations of heuristic-cue theory in service and consumer settings. Journal of Consumer Psychology 10, no. 3: 135–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, L., and W. Binney. 2010. Fear, guilt, and shame appeals in social marketing. Journal of Business Research 63, no. 2: 140–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M.B., and W. Gardner. 1996. Who is this ‘we’? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71, no. 1: 83–93. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, T.C. 1968. Implications of commodity theory for value change. In Psychological foundations of attitudes, ed. A.G. Greenwald, T.C. Brock, and Т.М. Ostrom, 243–75. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-T. 2011. Guilt appeals in cause-related marketing. International Journal of Advertising 30, no. 4: 587–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.C., X.P. Chen, and J.R. Meindl. 1998. How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism. Academy of Management Review 23, no. 2: 285–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R.B. 2008. Influence: Science and practice. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Cotte, J., R.A. Coulter, and M.L. Moore. 2005. Enhancing or disrupting guilt: The role of ad credibility and perceived manipulative intent. Journal of Business Research 58, no. 3: 361–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P., S. Kline, and Y. Dai. 2005. Corporate social responsibility practices, corporate identity, and purchase intention: A dual-process model. Journal of Public Relations Research 17, no. 3: 291–313.
   Google Scholar
• Duhachek, A., N. Agrawal, and D. Han. 2012. Guilt versus shame: Coping, fluency, and framing in the effectiveness of responsible drinking messages. Journal of Marketing Research 49, no. 6: 928–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, K. 1990. The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59, no. 2: 202–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eime, R.M., J.T. Harvey, M.J. Charity, M.M. Casey, H. Westerbeek, and W.R. Payne. 2016. Age profiles of sport participants. BMC Sports Science, Medicine & Rehabilitation 8: 6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastorf, J.W. 1980. Time urgency of the type-a behavior pattern. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 48, no. 2: 299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, D., A. Duhachek, and N. Agrawal. 2014. Emotions shape decisions through construal level: The case of guilt and shame. Journal of Consumer Research 41, no. 4: 1047–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, S.P., and S. Shavitt. 1994. Persuasion and culture: Advertising appeals in individualistic and collectivistic societies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 30, no. 4: 326–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J., and Y. Trope. 2013. When time flies: How abstract and concrete mental construal affect the perception of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 142, no. 2: 336–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A.F. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E.T. 1996. Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, ed. E.T. Higgins and A.W. Kruglanski, 133–68. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C., D.W. Hine, and A.D.F. Marks. 2017. The future is now: Reducing psychological distance to increase public engagement with climate change. Risk Analysis 37, no. 2: 331–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardes, F.R., M.L. Cronley, and J. Kim. 2006. Construal-level effects on preference stability, preference-behavior correspondence, and the suppression of competing brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology 16, no. 2: 135–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, L., and S. Epstein. 1991. Constructive thinking and coping with laboratory-induced stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61, no. 5: 789–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D.H., Y. Sung, and M. Drumwright. 2018. ‘Where I come from’ determines, ‘how I construe my future’: The fit effect of culture, temporal distance, and construal level. International Journal of Advertising 37, no. 2: 270–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., J.Y. Chung, and M. Lee. 2020. Consumer’s response to time restrictions: Role of construal level. Journal of Marketing Communications 26, no. 2: 207–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., and S. Youn. 2019. Consumers as time travelers: The moderating effects of risk perception and construal level on consumers’ responses to temporal framing. International Journal of Advertising 38, no. 8: 1070–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavine, H., and M. Snyder. 1996. Cognitive processing and the functional matching effect in persuasion: The mediating role of subjective perceptions of message quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 32, no. 6: 580–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavine, H., and M. Snyder. 2000. Cognitive processes and the functional matching effect in persuasion: Studies of personality and political behavior. In Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes, ed. G.R. Maio and J.M. Olson, 97–131. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A.Y., P.A. Keller, and B. Sternthal. 2010. Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. Journal of Consumer Research 36, no. 5: 735–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, H.B. 1971. Shame and guilt in neurosis. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. 1992. Shame the exposed self. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, M. 1991. Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology and Marketing 8, no. 1: 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Manuel, E., S. Youn, and D. Yoon. 2014. Functional matching effect in CRM: Moderating roles of perceived message quality and skepticism. Journal of Marketing Communications 20, no. 6: 397–418.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, H.R., and S. Kitayama. 1998. The cultural psychology of personality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 29, no. 1: 63–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M.D., and T.R. Levine. 1996. Persuasion. In An integrated approach to communication theory and research, ed. M.B. Salwen and D.N. Stack, 261–76. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mühlberger, A., R. Neumann, M.J. Wieser, and P. Pauli. 2008. The impact of changes in spatial distance on emotional responses. Emotion 8, no. 2: 192–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, S., Y. Trope, and N. Liberman. 2003. Creeping dispositionism: The temporal dynamics of behavior prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84, no. 3: 485–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyserman, D., and S.W.S. Lee. 2008. Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin 134, no. 2: 311–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyserman, D., and S.W.-S. Lee. 2007. Priming ‘culture’: Culture as situated cognition. In Handbook of cultural psychology, ed. S. Kitayama and D. Cohen, 255–79. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, C.W., E.S. Iyer, and D.C. Smith. 1989. The effects of situational factors on in-store grocery shopping behavior: The role of store environment and time available for shopping. Journal of Consumer Research 15, no. 4: 422–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H.S., E. Ulusoy, S.Y. Choi, and H.E. Lee. 2020. Temporal distance and descriptive norms on environmental behaviors: A cross-cultural examination of construal-level theory. Sage Open 10, no. 1: 215824402091457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R.E., and J.T. Cacioppo. 1986. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Washington, DC: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K.J., D.D. Rucker, and A.F. Hayes. 2007. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research 42, no. 1: 185–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, M.L., A.G. Sawyer, M.L. Rothschild, R.M. Heeler, E.C. Strong, and J.B. Reed. 1973. Marketing communication and the hierarchy of effects. In New models for mass communication research, ed. P. Clarke, 147–76. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Roux, C., K. Goldsmith, and A. Bonezzi. 2015. On the psychology of scarcity: When reminders of resource scarcity promote selfish (and generous) behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 42, no. 4: ucv048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serdar, C.C., M. Cihan, D. Yücel, and M.A. Serdar. 2021. Sample size, power and effect size revisited: Simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochemia Medica 31, no. 1: 010502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevilla, J., and J.P. Redden. 2014. Limited availability reduces the rate of satiation. Journal of Marketing Research 51, no. 2: 205–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimp, T.A. 1981. Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of consumer Brand choice. Journal of Advertising 10, no. 2: 9–48.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, F. 2011. Communicating market scarcity: The role of information congruity in shaping the persuasiveness of time restriction. International Journal of Business and Social Science 2, no. 23 20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, F. 2016. Information congruity in scarcity appeal: A structural equation modeling study of time-limited promotions. Journal of Marketing Communications 22, no. 2: 135–54.
   Google Scholar
• Simonson, I. 1992. The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research 19, no. 1: 105–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M.D., and D. Rouner. 1996. How message evaluation and source attributes may influence credibility assessment and belief change. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 73, no. 4: 974–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spears, N. 2001. Time pressure and information in sales promotion strategy: Conceptual framework and content analysis. Journal of Advertising 30, no. 1: 67–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri, R., and K.B. Monroe. 2003. The effects of time constraints on consumers’ judgments of prices and products. Journal of Consumer Research 30, no. 1: 92–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, C.I., and L.S. Huang. 2007. Designing time-limited cyber promotions: Effects of time limit and involvement. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 10, no. 1: 141–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trafimow, D., H.C. Triandis, and S.G. Goto. 1991. Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60, no. 5: 649–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., and N. Liberman. 2000. Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79, no. 6: 876–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., and N. Liberman. 2003. Temporal construal. Psychological Review 110, no. 3: 403–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., and N. Liberman. 2010. Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review 117, no. 2: 440–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., N. Liberman, and C. Wakslak. 2007. Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 17, no. 2: 83–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbo, P., S. Schlicker, A.A. Yates, M. Poos, and Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine, The National Academies. 2002. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 102, no. 11: 1621–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.I., and A. McGill. 2011. No pain, no gain? How fluency and construal level affect consumer confidence. Journal of Consumer Research 37, no. 5: 807–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J.C., P.J. Oakes, S.A. Haslam, and C. McGarty. 1994. Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20, no. 5: 454–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallacher, R.R., and D.M. Wegner. 1987. What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review 94, no. 1: 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinfurt, K. P., and F. M. Maghaddam. 2001. Culture and social distance: A case study of methodological cautions. The Journal of Social Psychology 141, no. 1: 101–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K., R. MacDonnell, and D.W. Dahl. 2011. It’s the mind-set that matters: The role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research 48, no. 3: 472–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J. 2019. The impact of self-construal and message frame valence on reactance: A cross-cultural study in charity advertising. International Journal of Advertising 38, no. 3: 405–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, D., and J. Sengupta. 2011. Effects of construal level on the price-quality relationship. Journal of Consumer Research 38, no. 2: 376–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, P., and O. Zhang. 2018. How pride influences product evaluation through construal level. European Journal of Marketing 52, no.7/8: 1750–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn, S., and H. Kim. 2018. Temporal duration and attribution process of cause-related marketing: Moderating roles of self-construal and product involvement. International Journal of Advertising 37, no. 2: 217–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn, S., and H. Kim. 2019. Effects of construal level and need for cognition on consumers’ responses to temporally framed benefits. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 18, no. 2: 135–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R.B., and H. Markus. 1982. Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. Journal of Consumer Research 9, no. 2: 123–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. 2010. The persuasiveness of individualistic and collectivistic advertising appeals among Chinese generation-X consumers. Journal of Advertising 39, no. 3: 69–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar