Perspectives: a research-based guide for brand activism

References

• Appels, M. 2023. CEO sociopolitical activism as a signal of authentic leadership to prospective employees. Journal of Management: 014920632211102. forthcoming
   Google Scholar
• Avery, J., and K. Pauwels. 2018. Brand activism: Nike and Colin Kaepernick. Harvard Business Review, Case No. 519046.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R.F., E. Bratslavsky, C. Finkenauer, and K.D. Vohs. 2001. Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology 5, no. 4: 323–70.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M., N. Wiegand, and W.J. Reinartz. 2019. Does it pay to be real? Understanding authenticity in TV advertising. Journal of Marketing 83, no. 1: 24–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J.A, and C. Heath. 2008. Who drives divergence? Identity-signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95, no. 3: 593–607. [InsertedFromOnline]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, L., and M. Eisend. 2023. Changes in definitions and operationalizations in advertising research- justified or not? Journal of Advertising 52, no. 3: 468–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, L., and T. Langner. 2023. A comprehensive approach to the study of advertising execution and its effects. International Journal of Advertising 42, no. 1: 227–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernritter, S.F., A.C. Loermans, P.W. Verlegh, and E.G. Smit. 2017. ‘We’ are more likely to endorse than ‘I’: The effects of self-construal and brand symbolism on consumers’ online brand endorsements. International Journal of Advertising 36, no. 1: 107–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagwat, Y., N.L. Warren, J.T. Beck, and G.F. Watson. IV, 2020. Corporate sociopolitical activism and firm value. Journal of Marketing 84, no. 5: 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigné, E., R. Currás-Pérez, and J. Aldás-Manzano. 2012. Dual nature of cause-brand fit: Influence on corporate social responsibility consumer perception. European Journal of Marketing 46, no. 3–4: 575–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bublitz, M.G., J.E. Escalas, L.A. Peracchio, P. Furchheim, S. Grau, A. Hamby, M.J. Kay, M.R. Mulder, and A. Scott. 2016. Transformative stories: A framework for crafting stories for social impact organizations. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 35, no. 2: 237–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champlin, S., Y. Sterbenk, K. Windels, and M. Poteet. 2019. How brand-cause fit shapes real world advertising messages: A qualitative exploration of ‘femvertising. International Journal of Advertising 38, no. 8: 1240–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., and J. Berger. 2013. When, why, and how controversy causes conversation. Journal of Consumer Research 40, no. 3: 580–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, H., and F.J. Boster. 2005. Development and validation of value-, outcome-, and impression-relevant involvement scales. Communication Research 32, no. 2: 235–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, S.-C., H. Kim, and Y. Kim. 2022. When brands get real: The role of authenticity and electronic word-of-mouth in shaping consumer response to brands taking a stand. International Journal of Advertising : 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dastidar, A., S. Sunder, and D. Shah. 2023. Societal spillovers of TV advertising – social distancing during a public health crisis. Journal of Marketing 87, no. 3: 337–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman. 2022. The trust barometer. https://www.edelman.com/trust/2022-trust-barometer
   Google Scholar
• Eigenraam, A.W., J. Eelen, and P.W.J. Verlegh. 2021. Let me entertain you? The importance of authenticity in online customer engagement. Journal of Interactive Marketing 54: 53–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilert, M., and A. Nappier Cherup. 2020. The activist company: Examining a company’s pursuit of societal change through corporate activism using an institutional theoretical lens. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 39, no. 4: 461–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalas, J.E, and J.R. Bettman. 2003. You are what they eat: Influence of reference groups on consumers’ connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology 13, no. 3: 339–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg, N., and G. Saluja. 2022. A tale of two “ideologies”: Differences in consumer response to brand activism. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research 7, no. 3: 325–39.
   Google Scholar
• Gneezy, A. 2017. Field experimentation in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research 54, no. 1: 140–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajdas, M., and R. Kłeczek. 2021. The real purpose of purpose-driven branding: Consumer empowerment and social transformations. Journal of Brand Management 28, no. 4: 359–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, P., A. Marcos, and V. Apaolaza. 2023. Past, present, and future of research on corporate social responsibility advertising. International Journal of Advertising 42, no. 1: 87–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holpuch, A. 2023. Behind the backlash against Bud Light’s transgender influencer. New York Times, May 4, https://www.nytimes.com/article/bud-light-boycott.html (accessed June 2, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Hydock, C., N. Paharia, and S. Blair. 2020. Should your brand pick a side? How market share determines the impact of corporate political advocacy. Journal of Marketing Research 57, no. 6: 1135–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungblut, M., and M. Johnen. 2022. When brands (don’t) take my stance: The ambiguous effectiveness of political brand communication. Communication Research 49, no. 8: 1092–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, K.L. 2014. Designing and implementing brand architecture strategies. Journal of Brand Management 21: 702–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kristofferson, K., K. White, and J. Peloza. 2014. The nature of slacktivism: How the social observability of an initial act of token support affects subsequent prosocial action. Journal of Consumer Research 40, no. 6: 1149–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J.Y., J.K. Kim, and K. Alharbi. 2022. Exploring the role of issue involvement and brand attachment in shaping consumer response toward corporate social advocacy initiatives: The case of nike’s colin kaepernick campaign. International Journal of Advertising 41, no. 2: 233–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mkrtchyan, A., J. Sandvik, and Z. Zhu. 2023. CEO activism and firm value, March 28.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, S., and N. Althuizen. 2020. Brand activism: Does courting controversy help or hurt a brand? International Journal of Research in Marketing 37, no. 4: 772–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, L., N. Dalton, P. Hull, and W. Kerr. 2022. Use purpose to transform your workplace. Harvard Business Review 100, no. 2: 52–5.
   Google Scholar
• Pracejus, J.W, and G.D. Olsen. 2004. The role of brand/cause fit in the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns. Journal of Business Research 57, no. 6: 635–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosengren, S., and N. Bondesson. 2014. Consumer advertising as a signal of employer attractiveness. International Journal of Advertising 33, no. 2: 253–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, P.L., J.D. Arnold, H.J. Walker, L. Zhang, and C.H. Van Iddekinge. 2022. Organizational political affiliation and job seekers: If I don’t identify with your party, am I still attracted? The Journal of Applied Psychology 107, no. 5: 724–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruttan, R.L, and L.F. Nordgren. 2021. Instrumental use erodes sacred values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 121, no. 6: 1223–40. [InsertedFromOnline]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, S.D., R. Terlutter, and S. Diehl. 2020. Talking about CSR matters: Employees’ perception of and reaction to their company’s CSR communication in four different CSR domains. International Journal of Advertising 39, no. 2: 191–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheidler, S., L.M. Edinger-Schons, J. Spanjol, and J. Wieseke. 2019. Scrooge posing as mother teresa: How hypocritical social responsibility strategies hurt employees and firms. Journal of Business Ethics 157, no. 2: 339–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J., and C. Mitchell. 2011. What’s the big ideal? Ogilvy & Mather.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, M.R, and K. Pounders. 2021. The power of advertising in society: Does advertising help or hinder consumer well-being? International Journal of Advertising 40, no. 4: 487–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, T., D. Korschun, and C.C. Troebs. 2020. Deconstructing corporate hypocrisy: A delineation of its behavioral, moral, and attributional facets. Journal of Business Research 114: 385–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallach, K.A, and D. Popovich. 2023. Cause beneficial or cause exploitative? Using joint motives to increase credibility of sustainability efforts. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 42, no. 2: 187–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., M.S. Qin, X. Luo, and Y.E. Kou. 2022. How support for black lives matter impacts consumer responses on social media. Marketing Science 41, no. 6: 1029–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wowak, A.J., J.R. Busenbark, and D.C. Hambrick. 2022. How do employees react when their CEO speaks out? Intra- and extra-firm implications of CEO sociopolitical activism. Administrative Science Quarterly 67, no. 2: 553–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, T., B. Naderer, J. Hohner, and Z. Olbermann. 2022. Finding gold at the end of the rainbowflag? Claim vagueness and presence of emotional imagery as factors to perceive rainbowwashing. International Journal of Advertising 41, no. 8: 1433–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., P. Chuenterawong, and K. Pugdeethosapol. 2021. Speaking up on black lives matter: A comparative study of consumer reactions toward brand and influencer-generated corporate social responsibility messages. Journal of Advertising 50, no. 5: 565–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar