Thinking from experience in psychosocial practice: reclaiming and teaching ‘use of self’

References

• AdamsR. (2002) Critical Practice in Social Work, Basingstoke, Palgrave/Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• ArmstrongP., ArmstrongH. & Scott-DixonK. (2008) Critical to Care: The Invisible Women in Health Services, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• BaileyR. & BrakeM. (1975) Radical Social Work, Edward Arnold, London.
   Google Scholar
• BaldwinM. (2013) The Use of Self in Therapy, Routledge, Hove.
   Google Scholar
• BerghA. & BjørnskovC. (2011) ‘Historical trust levels predict the current size of the welfare state’, Kyklos, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BionW. R. (1962 [1991]) Learning from Experience, Jason Aronson, Northvale, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• BoudD. (1999) ‘Avoiding the traps: seeking good practice in the use of self assessment and reflection in professional courses’, Social Work Education, vol. 18, pp. 121–132.
   Google Scholar
• BowerM. (2005) Psychoanalytic Theories for Social Work: Thinking Under Fire, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• BrittonR. (1998) Naming and containing. In Belief and imagination. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ChristensenT. & LægreidP. (2011) The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, Ashgate Publishing Limited, England.
   Google Scholar
• ClarkeJ., GewirtzS. & McLaughlinE. (2000) New Managerialism, New Welfare, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• CooperA. (2010) ‘What future? organisational forms, relationship-based social work practice and the changing world order’, in Relationship-Based Social Work, eds G.Ruch, D.Turney & A.Ward, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, pp. 229–244.
   Google Scholar
• CooperA. & LousadaJ. (2005) Borderline Welfare: Feeling and Fear of Feeling in Modern Welfare, Karnac Books, London.
   Google Scholar
• DaviesL. & LeonardP. (2004) ‘Introduction’ in Social Work in a Corporate Era: Practices of Power and Resistance, Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, pp. ix–xvii.
   Google Scholar
• DeberR. B., KraetschmerN., UrowitzS. & SharpeN. (2005) ‘Patient, consumer, client, or customer: what do people want to be called?’, Health Expectations, vol. 8, pp. 345–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DominelliL. (1996) ‘De-professionalising social work: anti-oppressive practice, competencies and post-modernism’, British Journal of Social Work, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 153–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DominelliL. (1997) Sociology for Social Work, Palgrave/Macmillan, Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• DominelliL. (2002) Anti-Oppressive Social Work Theory and Practice, Basingstoke, Palgrave/Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-AndersenG. (2006) ‘Three worlds of welfare capitalism’, in The Welfare State Reader, eds C.Pierson & F. C.Castles. 2nd ed.Polity Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• FawcettB. & FeatherstoneB. (1995) ‘On no! not more ‘isms’: feminism, post-modernism and post-structuralism in social work education’, Social Work Education, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 25–43.
   Google Scholar
• FergusonH. (2005) ‘Working with violence, the emotions and the psycho-social dynamics of child protection: reflections on the victoria climbie case’, Social Work Education, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 781–795.
   Google Scholar
• FergusonH. (2010) ‘Walks, home visits and atmospheres: risk and the everyday practices and mobilities of social work and child protection’, British Journal of Social Work, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1100–1117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FergusonI., LavaletteM. & MooneyG. (2002) Re-Thinking Welfare: A Critical Perspective, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• FookJ. (2002) Social Work: Critical Theory and Practice, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• FookJ. (2007) ‘Uncertainty: the defining characteristic of social work?’, in Social Work a Companion to Learning, eds M.Lymbery & K.Postle, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• FookJ., WhiteS. & GardnerF. (2006) ‘Critical reflection: a review of contemporary literature and understandings’, in Critical Reflection in Health and Social Care, eds S.White, J.Fook & F.Gardner, Open University Press, Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• FosterA. (2001) ‘The duty to care and the need to split’, Journal of Social Work Practice, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FreshwaterD., Horton-DeutschS., SherwoodG. & TaylorB. (2005) Resource Paper: The Scholarship of Reflective Practice . Available through Sigma Theta Tau International website. http://www.nursingsociety.org/Pages/SearchResultsPrimary.aspx?k = reflective%20practice%20paper&cs = This%20Site&u = http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nursingsociety.org.
   Google Scholar
• FroggettL. (2002) Love, Hate and Welfare. Psychosocial Approaches to Policy and Practice, The Policy Press, Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• FroggettL. & BriggsS. (2012) ‘Practice near and practice distant methods in human services research’, Journal of Qualitative Research, vol. 8, no. 2, http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/318/276.
   Google Scholar
• FroggettL. & HollwayW. (2010) ‘Psychosocial research analysis and scenic understanding’, Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 281–301.
   Google Scholar
• FroggettL. & SapeyB. (1997) ‘Communication, culture and competence in social work education’, Social Work Education, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• FrostE. (2008) ‘Why teach social work students psychosocial studies?’, Social Work Education, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 243–261.
   Google Scholar
• GrahamJ. R., SwiftK. J. & DelaneyR. (2011) Canadian Social Policy: An Introduction. 4th ed.Pearson Education, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• HagenK. P. & SchroyenF. (2009) ‘Helseforsikring i velferdsstaten – historikk og prinsipper’ [Health research in the welfare state – history and principles], inEt Helsevesen uten grenser? [Health services without boarders?], edsK.Haug, T. E.Olsen & O.Kaarbøe, Cappelen Akademisk Forlag, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Hingley JonesH. (2009) ‘Developing practice-near social work research to explore the emotional worlds of severely learning disabled adolescents in ‘transition’ and their families’, Journal of Social Work Practice, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 413–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoggettP. (2000) Emotional Life and the Politics of Welfare, MacMillan, Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• HoggetP. (2008) ‘Relational thinking and welfare practice’, in Object Relations and Social Relations: The Implication of the Relational Turn in Psychoanalysis, eds S.Clarke, H.Hahn & P.Hoggett, Karnac, London, pp. 65–85.
   Google Scholar
• HollwayW. (2001) ‘The psycho-social subject in “evidence-based practice”’, Journal of Social Work Practice, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 9–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HollwayW. (2009) ‘Applying the “experience-near” principle to research: psychoanalytically informed methods 1’, Journal of Social Work Practice, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 461–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HollwayW. & FroggettL. (2012) ‘Researching in-between experience and Reality’, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, vol. 13, no. 3, http://www.qualitative research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1899/3428.
   Google Scholar
• IxerG. (1999) ‘There's no such thing as reflection’, British Journal of Social Work, vol. 29, pp. 513–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JonesC. (1983) State Social Work and the Working Class, MacMillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• JonesC. & NovakT. (1999) Poverty, Welfare and the Disciplinary State, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• KadushinA. & HarknessD. (2002) Supervision in Social Work. 4th ed.Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• KleinM. (1959 [1985]) ‘Our adult world and its roots in infancy’, in Group Relations Reader 2, eds A. D.Colman & M. H.Geller, A.K. Rice Institute Series, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• KolbD. A. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• KondratM. (1999) ‘Who is the “self” in self-aware: professional self-awareness from a critical theory perspective’, Social Service Review, vol. 73, pp. 451–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LawM. & MacDermidJ. (2008) Evidence-based rehabilitation: a guide to practice. 2nd ed.SLACK Incororated, USA.
   Google Scholar
• LayK. & McGuireL. (2010) ‘Building a lens for critical reflection and reflexivity in social work education’, Social Work Education, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 539–555.
   Google Scholar
• LianO. S. (2007) Når helse blir en vare. Medikalisering og markedsorientering i helsetjenesten [When health becomes a commodity. Medicalization and market economy in the health services]. 2nd ed.Høyskoleforlaget, Kristiansand.
   Google Scholar
• LianO. S. (2008) ‘Pasienten som kunde’ [The patient as a customer], inDen moderne pasienten [The modern patient], ed.A.Tjora, Gyldendal Akademisk, Oslo, pp. 34–56.
   Google Scholar
• MartinsenK. (2005) Samtalen, skjønnet og evidensen [The conversation, interpretation and evidence], Akribe, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• MartinsenK. & ErikssonK. (2009) Å se og å innse. Om ulike former for evidens [To look and gain insight. About different kinds of evidence], Akribe, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• McCleanS. & FrostL. (2011) Psychosocial Approaches to Human Growth and Development: A Critical Introduction for Social Welfare and Health Professionals, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• McGloughlinK. (2005) ‘From ridicule to institutionalisation: anti-oppression, the state and social work’, Critical Social Policy, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 283–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlaughlinH. (2009) ‘What's in a name: client, patient, customer, consumer, expert-by experience, service user – what's next?’, British Journal of Social Work, vol. 39, pp. 1101–1117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGloughlinK. (2007) ‘Regulation and risk in social work: the general social care council and the social care register in context’, British Journal of Social Work, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1263–1277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MenziesLyth (1988 [1959]) ‘The functioning of social systems as a defense against anxiety’, in Containing Anxiety in Institutions, vol.1.Free Association Books, London.
   Google Scholar
• NicholsonC. (2009) ‘Researcher emotions: a way into the experiences of frail older people’, Journal of Social Work Practice, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 451–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PartonN. (2002) ‘Postmodern and social constructionist approaches to social work’, in Social Work: Themes, Issues and Critical Debates, Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp. 237–246.
   Google Scholar
• PartonN. (2009) ‘Postmodern and constructionist approaches to social work’, in Critical Practice in Social Work. 2nd ed.Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• PartonN. & O'ByrneP. (2000) ‘What do we mean by constructive social work?’, Critical Social Work, vol. 1, no. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Preston-ShootM. & AgassR. (1990) Making Sense of Social Work: Psychodynamics, Systems and Practice, MacMillan, Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• RamviE. (2007) Læring av erfaring? Et psykoanalytisk blikk på læreres læring [Learning from experience? A psychoanalytic perspective on teachers' learning]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Roskilde, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• RamviE. (2011) ‘The risk of entering relationships: experiences from a norwegian hospital’, Journal of Social Work Practice, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 285–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RamviE. & DaviesL. (2010) ‘Gender, mothering and relational work’, Journal of Social Work Practice, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 445–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReupertA. (2009) ‘Student's use of self: teaching implications’, Social Work Education, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 765–777.
   Google Scholar
• RichmondM. (1917) Social Diagnosis, Free Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• RuchG., TurneyD. & WardA. (2010) Relationship-Based Social Work: Getting to the Heart of Practice, Jessica Kingsley, London.
   Google Scholar
• RugkåsaM. (2011) ‘Mellom omsorg og politikk. profesjonsutøveres dilemma’, in Profesjon, kjønn og etnisitet, eds A.Leseth & K. N.Solbrække, Cappelen Damm Akademisk, Oslo, pp. 229–243.
   Google Scholar
• RushM. & KeenanM. (2013) ‘The social politics of social work: anti-oppressive welfare dilemmas in twenty-first century welfare regimes’, British Journal of Social Work, Advance Access February 28, pp. 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchönD. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner, Basic Books, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• StennerP., & TaylorD. (2008) ‘Psychosocial welfare: reflections on an emerging field’, Critical Social Policy, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 415–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TrevithickP. (2003) ‘Effective relationship-based practice: a theoretical explanation’, Journal of Social Work Practice, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 163–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TrevithickP. (2012) Social Work Skills ad Knowledge: A Practice Handbook (2012). 3rd ed.Open University Press, Maidenhead.
   Google Scholar
• VetlesenA. J. (2010) ‘Empati under press’, Sykepleien, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 60–63.
   Google Scholar
• WalkerdineV. (2008) ‘Contextualizing debates about psychosocial studies’, Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 341–345.
   Google Scholar
• WardA. (2008) ‘Beyond the instructional mode: creating a holding environment for learning about the use of self’, Journal of Social Work Practice, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 67–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WardA. (2010) ‘The use of self in relationship-based practice’, in Relationship-Based Social Work, eds G.Ruch, D.Turney & A.Ward, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, pp. 46–69.
   Google Scholar
• WhiteM. (1999) ‘Neoliberalism and the rise of the citizen as consumer from board’, in Citizens or Consumers, ed. D.Antony, Fernwood Publishing, Halifax.
   Google Scholar
• WhiteS., BroadhurstK., WastellD., PeckoverS., HallC. & PithouseA. (2009) ‘Whither practice-near research in the modernization programme? Policy blunders in children's services’, Journal of Social Work Practice, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 401–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WinnicottD. W. (1971) Playing and Reality, Tavistock, London.
   Google Scholar
• WosketV. (1999) The Therapeutic Use of Self: Counselling Practice, Research and Supervision, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar