Age- and Child-Friendly Cities and the Promise of Intergenerational Space

References

• Arizona State University Herberger Center for Design Excellence (2005) Livable Communities: An Evaluation Guide, AARP Public Policy Institute, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Ballve, T. (2013). http://territorialmasquerades.net/spectacle-and-the-production-of-space.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, S. (2002) ‘Building better cities with children and youth’, Environment and Urbanization, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessant, J. (2011) ‘Accounting for future generations: intergenerational equity in Australia’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 143–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, S. (1999) ‘The “blurring” of the lifecourse: narrative, memory and the question of authenticity’, Journal of Ageing and Identity, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 209–221.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, S. (1999a) The Mature Imagination, Open University Press, Buckingham.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, S. & Lowenstein, A. (2011) Generational Intelligence, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, S. (2004) ‘New ageism: age imperialism, personal experience and ageing policy’, in Ageing and Diversity, eds S.-O.Daatland & S.Biggs, Policy Press, Bristol, pp. 95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, S., Carstensen, L. & Hogan, P. (2012) ‘Social capital, lifelong learning and social participation’, in Global Agenda Council on Aging Society, Global Population Ageing: Peril or Promise, World Economic Forum (WEF), Cologny/Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, C. & Elias, A. (2010) ‘Future proofing our environments for an ageing population’, in Designs on Our Future: 3rd International Urban Design Conference, ed. S.Hoekwater, AST Management Pty Ltd, Canberra, pp. 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Buffel, T., Phillipson, C. & Scharf, T. (2012) ‘Ageing in urban environments: developing ‘age-friendly’ cities’, Critical Social Policy, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 597–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, A., Kimberley, H. & Biggs, S. (2013) Child-Friendly Cities and Age-Friendly Cities: Discussion paper prepared for Hobsons Bay City Council, Working Paper, Brotherhood of St Laurence, Fitzroy, Vic.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, P. & O'Brien, M. (2002) Children in the City: Home, Neighbourhood and Community, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• City of New York (2010) Active Design Guidelines, City of New York, New York.
   Google Scholar
• COAG Reform Council & McClintock, P. (2012) Review of Capital City Strategic Planning Systems: Report to the Council of Australian Governments, COAG Reform Council, Sydney, NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia (2006) A Community for All Ages −  Building the Future, Department of Health and Ageing, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, ACT.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Australian Governments (COAG) (2009) Investing in the Early Years – A National Early Childhood Development Strategy, COAG, Commonwealth of Australia, Barton, ACT.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2004) ‘Planet of slums’, New Left Review, vol. 26, pp. 5–34.
   Google Scholar
• Debord, G. (1955) ‘Introduction to a critique of urban geography’. http://library.nothingness.org/articles/SI/en/display/2.
   Google Scholar
• Debord, G. (1967) The Society of the Spectacle, translation (1970) by Fredy Perlman and Jon Supak, Black & Red, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Work and Pensions (2009) Building a Society for all Ages, Department for Work and Pensions, TSO, Norwich.
   Google Scholar
• Fredvang, M. & Biggs, S. (2012) , Social Policy Working Paper no. 16, Brotherhood of St Laurence & Centre for Public Policy, University of Melbourne ‘The rights of older persons: protection and gaps under human rights law’
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. (2007) ‘Why it remains important to take children's rights seriously’, International Journal of Children's Rights, vol. 15, pp. 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B. (2001) ‘Disability and the open city’, Urban Studies, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 251–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, R. (2002) ‘Containing children: some lessons on planning for play from New York City’, Environment and Urbanization, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 135–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastenbaum, R. (1993) ‘Encrusted elders: Arizona and the political spirit of post modern aging’, in Voices and Visions of Aging, ed. T.Cole, Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, M. (1985) ‘Die Institutionalisierung des Lebenslaufs: Historische Befunde und theoretische Argumente [The institutionalization of the life course: Historical findings and theoretical arguments]’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, vol. 37, pp. 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M. (1977) Maggie Kuhn on Aging, Westminster Press, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Laws, G. (1995) ‘Embodiment and emplacement’, International Journal of Aging & Human Development, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 253–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1991 [1968]) The Production of Space, translated by D. Nicholson-Smith, Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1996) Writings of cities, selected, translated and introduced by E Kofman and E LebasOxford.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. & Annesley, A. (2011) Re-Positioning Age Friendly Communities: Opportunities to Take AFC Mainstream, Canadian Urban Institute, Toronto, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, T. & Biggs, S. (2013) ‘International and European policy on work and retirement: Reinventing critical perspectives on active ageing and mature subjectivity’, Human Relations, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 23–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of Area Agencies on Aging (2007) A Blueprint for Action: Developing a Livable Community for All Ages, National Association of Area Agencies on Aging and Partners for Livable Communities, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Noyes, J. (2001) Designing for Humans, Taylor and Francis Group, East Sussex, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2004) Sustainable Cities and the Ageing Society, Brook Lyndhurst Ltd, London.
   Google Scholar
• Parliament of Victoria (2012) Inquiry into Opportunities for Participation of Victorian Seniors, Family & Community Development Committee, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. (2003) ‘Citizenship and the right to the global city: reimagining the capitalist world order’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 564–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggio, E. (2002) ‘Child friendly cities: good governance in the best interests of the child’, Environment and Urbanization, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 45–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. (2000) ‘New frontiers facing urban sociology at the Millennium’, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 143–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SatterthwaiteD. (1999) The Earthscan Reader on Sustainable Cities, Earthscan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Scharf, T., Phillipson, C., Smith, A. & Kingston, P. (2002) Growing Older in Socially Deprived Areas: Social Exclusion in Later Life, Help the Aged, London.
   Google Scholar
• Scharlach, A. E. (2009) ‘Creatign ageing-friendly communities’, Generations, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 5–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharlach, A. E. & Lehning, A. J. (2013) ‘Ageing-friendly communities and social inclusion in the United States of America’, Ageing and Society, vol. 33, no. Special Issue 01, pp. 110–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. E. (2009) Ageing in Urban Environments: Place Attachment and Social Exclusion, Policy Press, Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Tranter, P. & Sharpe, S. (2007) ‘Children and Peak Oil: An Opportunity in Crisis’, International Journal of Children's Rights, vol. 15, pp. 181–197.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre (2004) Building Child Friendly Cities: A Framework for Action, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, International Secretariat for Child Friendly Cities, Florence.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF (2010) ‘The Children Left Behind: A league table of inequality in child well-being in the world's rich countries’, in Innocenti Report Card 9, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (2012) World Urbanisation Prospects: The 2011 Revision, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, Population Estimates and Projections Section, New York.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) (2007) The State of World Population 2007, United Nations Population Fund, New York.
   Google Scholar
• van Vliet, W. (2011) ‘Intergenerational Cities: A Framework for Policies and Programs’, Journal of Intergenerational Relations, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 348–365.
   Google Scholar
• Wade-Benzoni, K. & Tost, L. (2009) ‘The egoism and the altruism of generational behaviour’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 165–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl, H-W. & Oswald, F. (2010) ‘Environmental perspectives on ageing’, in The SAGE Handbook of Social Gerontology, eds D.Dannefer & C.Phillipson, Sage Publications, London.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, A. (2009) ‘Commentary: the emergence and application of active aging in Europe’, Journal of Aging & Social Policy, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 75–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, C. (1978) The Child in the City, The Architectural Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1964) The Child, the Family and the Outside World, Pelican, London.
   Google Scholar
• Woolcock, G., Gleeson, B. & Randolph, B. (2010) ‘Urban research and child-friendly cities: a new Australian outline’, Children's Geographies, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 177–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO) (2002) Active Ageing: A Policy Framework, WHO, Noncommunicable Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Ageing and the Life Course, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO) (2007) Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide, WHO Press, WHO, Geneva.
   Google Scholar