In Defence of Actuarialism: Interrogating the Logic of Risk in Social Work Practice

References

• Barry, M. (2007). Effective approaches to risk assessment in social work: An international literature review. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
   Google Scholar
• Case, S., & Haines, K. (2009). Understanding youth offending: Risk factor research, policy and practice. Cullompton: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Castel, R. (1991). From dangerousness to risk. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 281–298). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deering, J. (2011). Probation practice and the new penology. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T., & Hardy, M. (2010). Evidence and knowledge for practice. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Firestein, S. (2012). Ignorance: How it drives science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Firestein, S. (2015). Failure: Why science is so successful. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgibbon, D. W. (2007). Risk analysis and the new practitioner. Punishment & Society, 9(1), 87–97.10.1177/1462474507070554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgibbon, D. W. (2011). Probation and social work on trial. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230343337
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J. (2002). Social work: A critical approach to practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Franko Aas, K. (2005a). Sentencing in the age of information: From faust to macintosh. London: The GlassHouse Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franko Aas, K. (2005b). The ad and the form: Punitiveness and technological culture. In J. Pratt, D. Brown, M. Borwn, S. Hallsworth, & W. Morrison (Eds.), The new punitiveness: Trends, theories, perspectives (pp. 150–166) Cullompton: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, D. (2009). A Brief Introduction to Social Work Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmilan.10.1007/978-0-230-36523-0
   Google Scholar
• Howe, D. (2015). The compleat social worker. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J., & Plowman, C. (2005). Risk assessment: A multidisciplinary approach to estimating harmful behaviour in mentally disordered offenders. In S. Wix & M. Humphreys (Eds.), Multidisciplinary working in forensic mental health (pp. 133–150). London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, G., & Macdonald, C. (2006). Introduction: Reframing social policy analysis. In G. Marston & C. Macdonald (Eds.), Analysing social policy (pp. 1–18). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Monahan, J. (1981). Predicting violent behaviour. Beverley Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (1996). Social work, risk and the ‘blaming system’. In N. Parton (Ed.), Social theory, social change and social work (pp. 98–114). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (1998). Risk, advanced liberalism and child welfare: The need to rediscover uncertainty and ambiguity. British Journal of Social Work, 28, 5–27.10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2008). Changes in the form of knowledge in social work: From the social to the ‘informational’? British journal of social work, 38, 253–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N., & Kirk, S. (2010). The nature and purposes of social work. In I. Shaw, K. Briar-Lawson, J. Orme, & R. Ruckdeschel (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social work research (pp. 23–36). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., Boaz, A., Grayson, L., Long, A., & Barnes, C. (2003). Types and quality of knowledge in social care. London: SCIE.
   Google Scholar
• Peay, J. (2003). Decisions and dilemmas: Working with mental health law. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, J. (2016). Risk control, rights and legitimacy in the limited liability state. British journal of criminology, 57(6), 1322–1339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/10304-000
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, G. (2003). Technicality and indeterminacy in probation practice: A case study. British Journal of Social Work, 35, 593–610.10.1093/bjsw/33.5.593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1996). The death of the social? Reconfiguring the territory of government. Economy and Society, 25, 327–356.10.1080/03085149600000018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1998). Governing risky individuals: The role of psychiatry in new regimes of control. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 5, 177–195.10.1080/13218719809524933
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511488856
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (2002). Society, madness and control. In A. Buchanan (Ed.), Care of the mentally disordered offender in the community (pp. 3–25). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schinkel, W. (2011). Pre-pression: The actuarial archive and new technologies of security. Theoretical Criminology, 15(4), 365–380.10.1177/1362480610395366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford, S. (2008). Taking a stand or playing it safe?: Resisting the moral conservatism of risk in social work practice. European Journal of Social Work, 11, 209–220.10.1080/13691450802075063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, T., & Colombo, A. (2008). Risk. In R. Tummey & T. Turner (Eds.), Critical issues in mental health (pp. 161–175). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S. (2006). Social Work in a Risk Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-0-230-21442-2
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S. (2009). Risk, governmentality and insurance: The actuarial recasting of social work. In H. W. Otto, A. Polutto, & H. Ziegler (Eds.), Evidence based practice: Modernising the knowledge base of social work (pp. 211–226).
   Google Scholar
• Witkin, S. L. (2017). Transforming social work. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zedner, L. (2006). Pre-crime and post criminology. Theoretical criminology, 11(2), 261–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar