The changing face of community work: from radicalism to networking. A European perspective

References

• Adams, R., Dominelli, L., & Payne, M. (2009). Social Work – themes, issues and critical debates (3rd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Autès, M. (2004). Les paradoxes du travail social ( 2è édition). Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Autès, M. (2019). Participation et démocratie dans le travail social. Le Sociographe, 68(4), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.3917/graph.068.0033
   Google Scholar
• Baillergeau, E. (2002). L’opbouwwerk, la promotion de la participation des habitants aux Pays-Bas entre militantisme et pratique professionnelle, thèse de doctorat. Université Grenoble-II.
   Google Scholar
• Baillergeau, E. (2007). L’émergence de l’intervention sociale de quartier en Europe. In E. Baillergeau & C. (Dir) Bellot (Eds.), Les Transformations de l’intervention sociale (pp. 155–179). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Barclay, P. M. (1982). Social Workers: Their Role and Tasks. London: Bedford Square Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bochel, C., Bochel, H., Somerville, P., & Worley, C. (2007). Marginalized or enabled voices? User participation in policy and practice. Social Policy and Society, 7(2), 201–210.
   Google Scholar
• Caré, S., & Chaton, G. (2016). Néolibéralisme(s) et démocratie(s). Revue de Philosophie Économique, 17(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.3917/rpec.171.0003
   Google Scholar
• Chiodo, E., & De Marco, T. (2019). Il laboratorio dei educativa territoriale dei centro « La Tenda ». Prospettive Sociali E Sanitarie, 2019(n1), 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R., Fawcett, B., & Meagher, G. (2009). Neoliberalism, New Public Management and the human service professions. Journal of Sociology, the Australian Sociological Association, 45(4), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783309346472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for communities and local government. (2006). Strong and Prosperous Communities White Paper. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/272357/6939.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Donzelot, J. (2011). Un Etat qui rend capable. In S. (Dir) Paugam (Ed.), Repenser la solidarité (pp. 87–109). PUF collection Quadriges.
   Google Scholar
• Folgheraiter, F. (2007). Relational social work: principles and practices. Social Policy and Society, 6(2), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746406003526
   Google Scholar
• Gouguet, J.-J. (1991). Le Travail de réseaux: undefined point de vue d’un économiste. In P. Yvonnick (Dir) (Ed.), L’intervention de réseaux: 20 ans d’expérience (pp. 137–153). Les Cahiers de l’ARPE n°3.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, E., & Saurugger, S. (2012). Les Groupes d’intérêts: Actions collectives et stratégies de représentation. Armand Colin collection U.
   Google Scholar
• The Gulbenkian Study Group. (1968). Community Work and Social Change. London: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. (1950). Community Organization and Planning. Macmillan Co.
   Google Scholar
• Jobert, B. (1994). Le Tournant néo-libéral en Europe. L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Kozel, A., & Sili, M. (2017). Introduction: Les modulations récentes du développement. Cahiers des Amériques Latines, 2017(85), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.4000/cal.8268
   Google Scholar
• Laurain, J. (1978). L’éducation populaire ou la vraie révolution: L’expérience des maisons des jeunes et de la culture. Paris: éditions de l’Adels.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence Neuman, W. (2014). Social research methods: Pearson new international edition: qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Lebon, F., & de Lescure, E. (2016). L’education Populaire au tournant du XXIè siècle. Editions du Croquant.
   Google Scholar
• Ledwith, M. (2011). Community Development: A critical approach (2nd ed.). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, W. (1994). Social Work in a changing Europe. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, C. (2010). Editorial. Journal of Social Work Practice, 24(3), 247–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2010.500116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, M. (2014). Modern social work theory (4th ed.). MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Quimet, G., & Rousseau, R. (1987). L’intervention sociale de réseaux: Une approche au service des réseaux sociaux: Introduction. In Y. Pinçon, Travail social, chemin des paradoxes. Cahiers de l’A.R.P.E, 1, 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, M. (1955). Community organization: Theory, principles and practice. Harper International edition.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, J. (2001). Approaches to community intervention. In J. Rothman, J. L. Erlich, & J. E. Tropman (Eds.), Strategies of community intervention (6th ed., pp. 27–64). F.E. Peacock Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sanicola, L. (1994). L’intervention de réseaux. Bayard.
   Google Scholar
• Seebohm Commission. (1968). Report of the Interdepartmental Committee on Local Authority and Allied Personal Services. The Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Secretary of State for Education and Science, the Minister of Housing and Local Government, and the Minister of Health. Accessed 20 September 2022, from: http://filestore.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pdfs/small/cab-129-138-c-88.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Soulet, M.-H. (1985). La Recherche en sciences sociales: undefined l’utilité pragmatique à l’universalisation de la rationalité instrumentale. L’homme Et la Société, 75-76, 31–49. https://doi.org/10.3406/homso.1985.2186
   Google Scholar
• Turunen, P. (2009). Chapter 2: Nordic Community of in Transition. In G. S. Hutchison (Ed.), Community Work in the Nordic Countries (pp. 38–63). Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, J. (1991). Social report for the Nordic countries, Living conditions and Inequality in the late 1980s. The Statistical Nordic Secretariat.
   Google Scholar