Activity theory: a framework for understanding multi-agency working and engaging service users in change

References

• Ajmal, Y., & Rees, I. (2001). Solutions in schools. Creative applications of solution focused brief therapy with young people and adults. London: BT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, M., Wilkin, A. Scott, A., & Kinder, K. (2001). Multi–agency activity: An audit of activity. Local government association research, report 17. Slough: National Foundation for Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhurst, D. (2009). Reflections on activity theory. Educational Review, 61, 197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaver, R. (1996). Educational psychology casework. A practice guide. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Booker, R. (2005). Integrated children’s services – implications for the profession. Educational and Child Psychology, 22, 127–142.
   Google Scholar
• Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, R. J. (2006). Educational psychology: The distinctive contribution. Educational Psychology in Practice: Theory, Research and Practice in Educational Psychology, 22, 289–304.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2003). Every child matters. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2004). Every child matters: Change for children. DfES: HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2004). The new multi–agency working: Collaborating to prevent the social exclusion of children and families. Journal of Integrated Care, 12, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., & Fox, C. (2005). Using activity theory to evaluate a complex response to social exclusion. Educational and Child Psychology, 22, 51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Prienta-Konsultit Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Engestrom, Y. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S. (2005). The development of a group consultation approach to service delivery. Educational Psychology in Practice: Theory, Research and Practice in Educational Psychology, 21, 131–146.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, P., Woods, K., Lewis, S., Rooney, S., Squires, G., & O’Connor, M. (2006). A review of the functions and contribution of educational psychologists in England and Wales in the light of “every child matters: change for children”, research report RR 792. London: DfES.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M., Martin, P., & Green, G. (2007). Doing practitioner research. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M., Miller, C., & Ross, N. (2002). The impact of individual philosophies of teamwork on multiprofessional practice and the implications for education. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 14, 237–247.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, S., & Leadbetter, J. (2009). Educational psychologists and multi–agency working: Exploring professional identity. Educational Psychology in Practice: Theory, Research and Practice in Educational Psychology, 25, 97–111.
   Google Scholar
• Glasser, W. (1999). Choice theory: A new psychology for personal freedom. New York: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Halsey, K., Gulliver, C., Johnson, K. M., & Kinder, K. (2005). Evaluation of behaviour and education support teams, research report RR 706. London: DfES.
   Google Scholar
• Hartnell, N. (2010). Multi-disciplinary approaches to pupil behaviour in school – the role of evaluation in service delivery. Educational Psychology in Practice: Theory, Research and Practice in Educational Psychology, 26, 187–203.
   Google Scholar
• Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC). (2010). Standards of proficiency – practitioner psychologists. London: HCPC.
   Google Scholar
• HMSO. (2003). The Victoria Climbie inquiry: Report of an inquiry by Lord Laming. London: Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G.A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs: vols. 1 & 2. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leadbetter, J. (2005). Activity theory as a conceptual framework and analytical tool within the practice of educational psychology. Educational & Child Psychology, 22, 18–28.
   Google Scholar
• Leadbetter, J., Daniels, H., Edwards, A., Martin, D., Middleton, D., Popova, A., Warmington, P., Apostolov, A., & Brown, S. (2007). Professional learning within multi-agency children’s services: Researching into practice. Educational Research, 49, 83–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, D., Burman, E., & Parker, I. (1995). Collaborative research into education case conferences. Educational Psychology in Practice: Theory, Research and Practice in Educational Psychology, 11, 41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C., & Ahmad, Y. (2000). Collaboration and partnership: An effective response to complexity and fragmentation or solution built on sand? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 20, 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Norgate, R., Trail, M., & Osborne, C. (2008). Educational psychologists’ involvement in multi-disciplinary work in relation to fostering and adoption. In investigations into the work of educational psychologists in children’s services authorities in England. Durham: AEP.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, C. (1999). Education, exclusion and citizenship. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, J. (1998). The attractions of joined up thinking. Adults Learning, 10, 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Roaf, C. (2002). Coordinating services for included children. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M., Anning, A., & Frost, N. (2005). “When is a teacher not a teacher?”: Knowledge creation and the professional identity of teachers within multi-agency teams. Studies in Continuing Education, 27, 175–191.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M., & Cottrell, D. (2005). Health professionals in multi-disciplinary and multi-agency teams: Changing professional practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19, 547–560.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sloper, P. (2004). Facilitators and barriers for co-ordinated multi-agency services. Child Care: Health and Development, 30, 571–580.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. A. (2003). Secret practices: Interdisciplinary work in child welfare. Leicester: Upfront Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar