Evidence-based teaching of essay writing: Intervention at primary school

References

• Andrell Education. (n.d.) What is big writing? Retrieved August 31, 2018, from http://www.andrelleducation.com/big-writing/
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Boscolo, P., & Ascorti, K. (2004). Effects of collaborative revision on children’s ability to write understandable narrative texts. In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 157–170). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1997). Research methods in education (5th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• De La Paz, S. (1999). Self-regulated strategy instruction in regular education settings: Improving outcomes for students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14(2), 92–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/sldrp1402_3
   Google Scholar
• Draper, S. W. (n.d.) Effect size. Retrieved April 6, 2018, from //www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/best/effect.html
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). EU high level group of experts on literacy final report. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/96d782cc-7cad-4389-869a-bbc8e15e5aeb
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidalgo, R., Torrance, M., & Garcia, J. (2008). The long-term effects of strategy-focused writing instruction for grade six students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 672–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2016). A path to better writing: Evidence-based practices in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 69(4), 359–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grix, J. (2002). Introducing students to the generic terminology of social research. Politics, 22(3), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.00173
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2009). Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Premises, evolution, and the future. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II: No. 6. Teaching and Learning Writing, 1(1, Pt. 2), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1348/978185409X422542
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organisation of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 29–55). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 1–27). Erlbauam.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jampole, E. S., Mathews, F. N., & Konopak, B. C. (1994). Academically gifted students’ use of imagery for creative writing. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 28(1), 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1994.tb00715.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster, M., Tribushinina, E., De Jong, P. F., & Van den Bergh, B. (2015). Teaching children to write: A meta-analysis of writing intervention research. Journal of Writing Research, 7(2), 249–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2015.07.02.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learning and Teaching Scotland. (2012). Curriculum for excellence: Experiences and outcomes. Retrieved April 26, 2015, from http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/learningandteaching/thecurriculum/howisthecurriculumorganised/experiencesandoutcomes/
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, P., Torrance, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Fidalgo, R. (2017). Effects of direct instruction and strategy modeling on upper-elementary students’ writing development. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:1054. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01054
   Google Scholar
• Lowther, D. L., Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. M. (2003). When each one has one: The influences on teaching strategies and student achievement of using laptops in the classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(3), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdams, R. (2016). Evaluating universal infant free school meals, Scotland: Second monitoring report of school-meal uptake. NHS Health Scotland. Retrieved November 9, 2017, from http://www.healthscotland.scot/media/1186/28354-universal-free-school-meals-report_oct_english.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McCutchen, D. (2011). From novice to expert: Implications of language skills and writing-relevant knowledge for memory during the development of writing skill. Journal of Writing Research, 3(1), 51–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2011.03.01.3
   Google Scholar
• Rietdijk, S., Janssen, T., Weijen, D., Van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2017). Improving writing in elementary schools through a comprehensive writing programme. Journal of Writing Research, 9(2), 173–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2017.09.02.04
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, L. A., & Graham, S. (2008). A meta-analysis of single subject design writing intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 879–906. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.4.879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saretsky, G. (1972). The OEO P.C. experiment and the. John Henry Effect. Phi Delta Kappan, 53(9), 579–581. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20373317
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32(4), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3204_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2016). National improvement framework for Scottish education: Achieving excellence and equity. https://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/3000/https://www.gov.scot/Resource/0049/00491758.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2019). Achievement of curriculum for excellence (CfE) levels 2018/19. https://www.gov.scot/publications/achievement-curriculum-excellence-cfe-levels-2018-19/
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2020). Achieving excellence and equity: 2020 national improvement framework and improvement plan. https://www.gov.scot/publications/2020-national-improvement-framework-improvement-plan/
   Google Scholar
• Stemler, S. E., & Tsai, J. (2008). 3 best practices in interrater reliability three common approaches. In J. Osborne (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 29–50). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, M., Fidalgo, R., & García, J. N. (2007). The teachability and effectiveness of cognitive self-regulation in sixth grade writers. Learning and Instruction, 17(3), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. (2012). Big writing: Raising writing standards: A powerful and effective whole-school approach. Oxford University Press. Retrieved April 27, 2016, from http://www.andrelleducation.com/product/raising-writing-standards-introduction/
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(1), 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar