Effects of individualised and small-group guided oral reading interventions on reading skills and reading attitude of poor readers in grades 2–4

References

• Aarnoutse, C. A. J., and T. J. Kapinga. 2005. Handleiding Technisch Lezen 345678 [Fluency of Word Reading 345678 Manual]. Ridderkerk: Onderwijs Advisering.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. 2001. What Really Matters for Struggling Readers? Designing Research-based Programs. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, P. G., and E. Newby-Clark. 2002. “The Role of Naming Speed within a Model of Reading Acquisition.” Reading and Writing 15: 109–126.10.1023/A:1013820421199
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, P. G., and M. Wolf. 1993. “Theoretical Links among Naming Speed, Precise Timing Mechanisms and Orthographic Skill in Dyslexia.” Reading and Writing 5: 69–85.10.1007/BF01026919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, P. F., and A. van der Leij. 2003. “Developmental Changes in the Manifestation of a Phonological Deficit in Dyslexic Children Learning to Read a Regular Orthography.” Journal of Educational Psychology 95: 22–40.10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., L. M. Dunn, and D. M. Dunn. 1997. The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. 3rd ed. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H. 2003. Quick Reads. Parsippany, NJ: Pearson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Jongen, I., and R. Krom. 2009. DMT en AVI [Three-minutes Test and AVI]. Arnhem: Cito.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, J. R., A. Ball, B. K. Geier, R. Parrila, and L. Wade-Woolley. 2011. “The Development of Reading Interest and Its Relation to Reading Ability.” Journal of Research in Reading 34: 263–280.10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01439.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauda, S. L., and J. T. Guthrie. 2008. “Relationships of Three Components of Reading Fluency to Reading Comprehension.” Journal of Educational Psychology 100: 310–321.10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krom, R., S. van Berkel, and I. Jongen. 2006–10. Begrijpend Lezen groep 4 – 6 [Reading Comprehension Grades 2–4]. Arnhem: Cito.
   Google Scholar
• Krom, R., I. Jongen, N. Verhelst, F. Kamphuis, and F. Kleintjes. 2010. DMT en AVI; groep 3 tot en met 8 [DMT and AVI; Grades 1 to 6]. Arnhem: Cito.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M. 2004. “Helping Students Become Accurate, Expressive Readers: Fluency Instruction for Small Groups.” The Reading Teacher 58: 338–344.10.1598/RT.58.4.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M. R., and S. A. Stahl. 2003. “Fluency: A Review of Developmental and Remedial Practices.” Journal of Educational Psychology 95: 3–21.10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., and J. Samuels. 1974. “Toward a Theory of Automatic Information Processing in Reading.” Cognitive Psychology 6: 293–323.10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landerl, K., H. Wimmer, and U. Frith. 1997. “The Impact of Orthographic Consistency on Dyslexia: A German–English Comparison.” Cognition 63: 315–334.10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00005-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, M. C., D. J. Kear, and R. A. Ellsworth. 1995. “Children’s Attitudes toward Reading: A National Survey.” Reading Research Quarterly 30: 934–956.10.2307/748205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrett, F., and S. Thorpe. 1996. “How Important is the Praise Element in the Pause, Prompt and Praise Tutoring Procedures for Older Low‐progress Readers?” Educational Psychology 16: 193–206.10.1080/0144341960160208
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. 2000. Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and its Implications for Reading Instruction (Reports of the Subgroups). Washington, DC: National Institute for Child Health and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, R. E., H. L. Swanson, and C. Geraghty. 2010. “Improvement in Reading Rate under Independent and Difficult Text levels: Influences on Word and Comprehension Skills.” Journal of Educational Psychology 102: 1–19.10.1037/a0017488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, R. E., A. White, and H. L. Swanson. 2007. “Repeated Reading versus Continuous Reading: Influences on Reading Fluency and Comprehension.” Exceptional Children 74: 31–46.10.1177/001440290707400102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. 1985. Reading Ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petscher, Y. 2010. “A Meta-analysis of the Relationship between Student Attitudes Towards Reading and Achievement in Reading.” Journal of Research in Reading 33: 335–355.10.1111/jrir.2010.33.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. 2000. “An Achievement Goal Theory Perspective on Issues in Motivation Terminology, Theory, and Research.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 92–104.10.1006/ceps.1999.1017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasbash, J., F. Steele, W. J. Browne, and H. Goldstein. 2009. A User’s Guide to MLwiN ( version 2.10). Bristol: University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Schlichting, L. 2005. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test III-NL. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Therrien, W. J. 2004. “Fluency and Comprehension Gains as a Result of Repeated Reading: A Meta-analysis.” Remedial and Special Education 25: 252–261.10.1177/07419325040250040801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadasy, P. F., and E. A. Sanders. 2008a. “Benefits of Repeated Reading Intervention for Low-achieving Fourth- and Fifth-grade Students.” Remedial and Special Education 29: 235–249.10.1177/0741932507312013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadasy, P. F., and E. A. Sanders. 2008b. “Repeated Reading Intervention: Outcomes and Interactions with Readers’ Skills and Classroom Instruction.” Journal of Educational Psychology 100: 272–290.10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadasy, P. F., and E. A. Sanders. 2009. “Supplemental Fluency Intervention and Determinants of Reading Outcomes.” Scientific Studies of Reading 13: 383–425.10.1080/10888430903162894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Bergen, E., P. F. de Jong, A. Plakas, B. Maassen, and A. van der Leij. 2011. “Child and Parental Literacy Levels within Families with a History of Dyslexia.” The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 53: 28–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, J., S. Vaughn, M. Edmonds, and C. K. Reutebuch. 2008. “A Synthesis of Fluency Interventions for Secondary Struggling Readers.” Reading and Writing 21: 317–347.10.1007/s11145-007-9085-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheldall, K., F. Merrett, and S. Colmar. 1987. “Pause, Prompt and Praise for Parents and Peers: Effective Tutoring of Low Progress Readers.” Support for Learning 2: 5–12.10.1111/sufl.1987.2.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Wiederholt, J., and B. Bryant. 2001. Gray Oral Reading Tests. 4th ed. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., J. S. Eccles, K. S. Yoon, R. D. Harold, A. Arbreton, C. Freedman-Doan, and P. C. Blumenfeld. 1997. “Change in Children’s Competence Beliefs and Subjective Task Values Across the Elementary School Years: A 3-year Study.” Journal of Educational Psychology 89: 451–469.10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. 1991. “Naming Speed and Reading: The Contribution of the Cognitive Neurosciences.” Reading Research Quarterly 26: 123–141.10.2307/747978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M., P. G. Bowers, and K. Biddle. 2000. “Naming Speed Processes.” Timing, and Reading: A Conceptual Review, Journal of Learning Disabilities 33: 387–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M., A. Goldberg, G. A. O’Rourke, C. Gidney, M. Lovett, P. Cirino, and R. Morris. 2002. “The Second Deficit: An Investigation of the Independence of Phonological and Naming-speed Deficits in Developmental Dyslexia.” Reading and Writing 15: 43–72.10.1023/A:1013816320290
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., D. Bertrand, D. Toth, V. Csepe, A. Reis, L. Faisca, N. Saine, H. Lyytinen, A. Vaessen, and L. Blomert. 2010. “Orthographic Depth and Its Impact on Universal Predictors of Reading: A Cross-language Investigation.” Psychological Science 21: 551–559.10.1177/0956797610363406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar