A categorisation of teacher feedback in the classroom: a field study on feedback based on routine classroom assessment in primary school

References

• Atkinson, P., and W. Housley. 2003. Interactionism. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849209274
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. S. 2014. “Quality of Data Analysis.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, edited by U. Flick, 496–509. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446282243
   Google Scholar
• Björklund Boistrup, L. 2015. “Governing through Implicit and Explicit Assessment Acts: Multimodality in Mathematics Classrooms.” In Negotiating Spaces for Literacy Learning: Multimodality and Governmentality, edited by M. Hamilton, R. Heydon, K. Hibbert, and R. Stooke, 131–148. London: Bloomsbury Books.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5: 7–74.10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 2011. “Assessment for Learning in the Classroom.” In Assessment and Learning. 2nd ed., edited by J. Gardner, 11–32. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charon, J. M. 2009. Symbolic Interactionism: An Introduction, an Interpretation, an Integration. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M., and A. Sinclair. 2014. “Socratic Questioning in the Paideia Method to Encourage Dialogical Discussions.” Research Papers in Education 29: 20–43.10.1080/02671522.2012.742132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, D. 2011. “Reflection and Learning: Characteristics, Obstacles, and Implications.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 43: 838–852.10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00600.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, I. 1999. Grounding Grounded Theory: Guidelines for Qualitative Inquiry. London: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012214640-4/50011-5
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C., and M. Waring. 2011. “Exploring Students’ Perceptions of Feedback in Relation to Cognitive Styles and Culture.” Research Papers in Education 26 (2): 171–190.10.1080/02671522.2011.561976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, H. 2014. “Using Pupil Perspective in the Primary Classroom: An Exploration of Some of the Potential Issues.” Research Papers in Education 29: 390–409.10.1080/02671522.2013.776624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frelin, A. 2010. “Teachers’ Relational Practices and Professionality.” Dissertation, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, J., W. Harlen, L. Hayward, G. Stobart, and M. Montgomery. 2010. Developing Teacher Assessment. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gielen, S., L. Tops, F. Dochy, and P. Onghena. 2010. “A Comparative Study of Peer and Teacher Feedback and of Various Peer Feedback Forms in a Secondary School Writing Curriculum.” British Educational Research Journal. 36: 143–162.10.1080/01411920902894070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. 1998. Doing Grounded Theory. San Francisco, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 2007. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, E., B. McCallum, and C. Gipps. 2000. “Teacher Feedback Strategies in Primary Classrooms – New Evidence.” In Feedback for Learning, edited by S. Askew, 21–31. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harrop, A., and J. Swinson. 2007. “The Behavioural Approach in Schools: A Time for Caution Revisited.” Educational Studies 33: 41–52.10.1080/03055690600948174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77: 81–112.10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havnes, A., K. Smith, O. Dysthe, and K. Ludvigsen. 2012. “Formative Assessment and Feedback: Making Learning Visible.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 38: 21–27.10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, J. P., and D. Shulman. 2011. Self and Society: A Symbolic Interactionist Social Psychology. 11th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, C., and M. Abedin. 2013. “Classroom Dialogue: A Systematic Review across Four Decades of Research.” Cambridge Journal of Education 43: 325–356.10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, S. 2009. “A Pluralist View of Generalization in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 32: 25–38.10.1080/17437270902759931
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and Y.-S. Lee. 2013. “Effects of Testing.” In International Guide to Student Achievement, edited by J. Hattie and E. M. Anderman, 416–418. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mameli, C., and L. Molinari. 2013. “Interactive Micro-processes in Classroom Discourse: Turning Points and Emergent Meanings.” Research Papers in Education 28: 196–211.10.1080/02671522.2011.610900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, B., and M. J. Drummond. 2006. “How Teachers Engage with Assessment for Learning: Lessons from the Classroom.” Research Papers in Education 21 (2): 133–149.10.1080/02671520600615638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinari, L., and C. Mameli. 2013. “Process Quality of Classroom Discourse: Pupil Participation and Learning Opportunities.” International Journal of Educational Research 62: 249–258.10.1016/j.ijer.2013.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. 2000. “Better Assessment in Mathematics Education? A Social Perspective.” In Multiple Perspectives on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, edited by J. Boaler, 225–242. Westport, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Nsibande, R. N., and M. M. Modiba. 2012. “‘I just do as expected’: Teachers’ Implementation of Continuous Assessment and Challenges to Curriculum Literacy.” Research Papers in Education 27: 629–645.10.1080/02671522.2011.560961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M., K. Handley, J. Millar, and B. O’Donovan. 2010. “Feedback : All That Effort, but What is the Effect?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35: 277–289.10.1080/02602930903541007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 1998. “Formative Assessment: Revisiting the Territory.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5: 77–84.10.1080/0969595980050104
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A. 2000. The Role of Classroom Assessment in Teaching and Learning ( CSE Tech. Rep. 517). Los Angeles, CA: CRESST/University of Colorado at Boulder.
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. 2008. “Focus on Formative Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 78: 153–189.10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinson, J., and R. Knight. 2007. “Teacher Verbal Feedback Directed towards Secondary Pupils with Challenging Behaviour and Its Relationship to Their Behaviour.” Educational Psychology in Practice 23: 241–255.10.1080/02667360701507327
   Google Scholar
• Thornberg, R. 2010. “School Democratic Meetings: Pupil Control Discourse in Disguise.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26: 924–932.10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. 2013. “Feedback.” In International Guide to Student Achievement, edited by J. Hattie and E. M. Anderman, 402–404. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H., and J. Pryor. 1998. Investigating Formative Assessment: Teaching Learning and Assessment in the Classroom. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tunstall, P., and C. Gipps. 1996. “Teacher Feedback to Young Children in Formative Assessment: A Typology.” British Educational Research Journal 22: 389–404.10.1080/0141192960220402
   Google Scholar
• Twiner, A., K. Littleton, C. Coffin, and D. Whitelock. 2013. “Meaning Making as an Interactional Accomplishment: A Temporal Analysis of Intentionality and Improvisation in Classroom Dialogue.” International Journal of Educational Research 63: 94–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar