Reading for meaning: the effects of Developmental Education on motivation and achievement in reading informative texts in primary school

References

• Aarnoutse, C., and G. Schellings. 2003. “Een onderzoek naar de stimulering van leesstrategieën en leesmotivatie in probleemgestuurde leeromgevingen.” [A Study of the Enhancement of Reading Strategies and Reading Motivation in Problem-oriented Learning Environments.] Pedagogische Studiën 80 (2): 110–126.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L. 2002. “What I’ve Learned About Effective Reading Instruction: From a Decade of Studying Exemplary Elementary Classroom Teachers.” Phi Delta Kappan 83 (10): 740–747.10.1177/003172170208301007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babayiğit, S. 2014. “The Role of Oral Language Skills in Reading and Listening Comprehension of Text: A Comparison of Monolingual (L1) and Bilingual (L2) Speakers of English Language.” Journal of Research in Reading 37 (S1), S22–S47.10.1111/jrir.v37.S1
   Google Scholar
• Brand-Gruwel, S. 1995. “Onderwijs in tekstbegrip.” [Education in Text Comprehension.] Doctoral diss., Nijmegen: Radboud University.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. E. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• De Milliano, I. 2013. “Literacy Development of Low-achieving Adolescents: The Role of Engagement in Academic Reading and Writing.” Doctoral diss., Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• De Naeghel, J., and H. Van Keer. 2013. “The Relation of Student and Class-level Characteristics to Primary School Students’ Autonomous Reading Motivation: A Multilevel Approach.” Journal of Research in Reading 36 (4): 351–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijsselbloem, J. 2008. Tijd voor onderwijs [ Time for Education]. ‘s-Gravenhage: Sdu. Accessed September 18, 2013. http://www.parlement.com/9291000/d/th31007_6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Droop, M., W. Van Elsäcker, R. Voeten, and L. Verhoeven. 2012. Effecten van de BLIKSEM-aanpak in groep 5 & 6 van het basisonderwijs [ Effects of the BLIKSEM-approach in Grades 3 & 4 of Primary Education]. DenHaag: Expertisecentrum Nederlands/HCO. Accessed July 7, 2013. http://www.expertisecentrumnederlands.nl/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Rapport-onderzoek-BLIKSEM_eindversie.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Droop, M., W. van Elsäcker, R. Voeten, and L. Verhoeven. 2016. “Long-term Effects of Strategic Reading Instruction in the Intermediate Elementary Grades.” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 9 (1): 77–102. doi:10.1080/19345747.2015.1065528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Förrer, M., & K. Van de Mortel. 2010. Lezen … denken … begrijpen! Handboek begrijpend lezen in het basisonderwijs [Reading … Thinking … Understanding! Manual for Reading Comprehension in Primary Education]. Amersfoort: CPS.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T. 2010. Motivations for Reading Questionnaire. Accessed September 24, 2013. http://www.cori.umd.edu/measures/MRQ.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., and S. L. Klauda. 2014. “Effects of Classroom Practices on Reading Comprehension, Engagement, and Motivations for Adolescents.” Reading Research Quarterly 49 (4): 387–416. doi:10.1002/rrq.81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., A. McRae, and S. L. Klauda. 2007. “Contributions of Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction to Knowledge About Interventions for Motivations in Reading.” Educational Psychologist 42 (4): 237–250.10.1080/00461520701621087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., and A. Wigfield. 2000. “Engagement and Motivation in Reading.” In Reading Research Handbook. Vol. III, edited by M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, and R. Barr, 403–424. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., A. Wigfield, P. Barbosa, K. C. Perencevich, A. Taboada, M. H. Davis, and S. Tonks. 2004. “Increasing Reading Comprehension and Engagement Through Concept-oriented Reading Instruction.” Journal of Educational Psychology 96 (3): 403–423.10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., A. Wigfield, and W. You. 2012. “Instructional Contexts for Engagement and Achievement in Reading.” In Handbook of Research on Students Engagement, edited by S. Christensen, A. Reschly, and C. Wylie, 601–634. New York, NY: Springer Science.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
   Google Scholar
• Heesters, K. S., K. van Berkel, F. van der Schoot, and B. Hemker. 2007. Balans van het leesonderwijs aan het einde van de basisschool 4 [Balance of Reading Instruction at the End of Primary School], 33. Arnhem: Cito, PPON-reeks nr.
   Google Scholar
• Hornstra, L., I. van der Veen, T. Peetsma, and M. Volman. 2013. “Developments in Motivation and Achievement During Primary School: A Longitudinal Study on Group-specific Differences.” Learning and Individual Differences 23: 195–204.10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. 1995. Applied Multilevel Analysis. Amsterdam: TT-Publikaties.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D., and P. Smagorinski. 2000. Vygotskian Perspectives on Literacy Research. Constructing Meaning Through Collaborative Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., and S. S. Hurley. 2009. “Design Sensitivity: Statistical Power for Applied Experimental Research.” In The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, edited by L. Bickman and D. J. Rog, 44–76. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781483348858
   Google Scholar
• McKeown, M. G., I. L. Beck, and R. G. K. Blake. 2009. “Rethinking Reading Comprehension Instruction: A Comparison of Instruction for Strategies and Content Approaches.” Reading Research Quarterly 44 (3): 218–253.10.1598/RRQ.44.3.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., M. O. Martin, A. M. Kennedy, and P. Foy. 2007. PIRLS 2006 International Report: IEA’s Progress in International Reading Literacy Study in Primary Schools in 40 Countries. Boston, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
   Google Scholar
• NICHHD (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development). 2000. Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read. Accessed July 7, 2013. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/Pages/smallbook.aspx
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2010. PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do - Student performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science (Volume 1). doi:10.1787/9789264091450-en.
   Google Scholar
• Pompert, B. 2004. Thema’s en taal. Ontwikkelingsgericht onderwijs in de bovenbouw [ Themes and Language. Developmental Education in the Upper Grades]. Assen: Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Pompert, B. 2012. “Teaching Reading by Writing.” In Developmental Education for Young Children, edited by B. van Oers, 239–252. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-4617-6
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J., J. C. Raven, and J. H. Court. 2000. Standard Progressive Matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U., E. Schaffner, J. Möller, and A. Wigfield. 2012. “Dimensions of Reading Motivation and Their Relation to Reading Behavior and Competence.” Reading Research Quarterly 47 (4): 427–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selya, A. S., J. S. Rose, L. C. Dierker, D. Hedeker, and R. J. Mermelstein. 2012. “A Practical Guide to Calculating Cohen’s f2, a Measure of Local Effect Size, from PRO MIXED.” Front Psychology 3 (111). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.0111.
   Google Scholar
• Sijtsma, K. 2009. “On the Use, Misuse and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha.” Psychometrika 74 (1): 107–120.10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. 2002. Reading for Understanding. Toward a Research and Development Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2001. Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Tellegen, S., and J. Frankhuisen. 2002. Waarom is lezen plezierig? [Why is Reading Pleasant?]. Delft: Stichting lezen/Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2006. International Standard Classification of Education: ISCED 1997. Accessed July 7, 2013. http://www.uis.unesco.org/Library/Documents/isced97-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Elsäcker, W. 2002. “Development of Reading Comprehension. The Engagement Perspective.” Doctoral diss., Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oers, B. 2009. “Developmental Education: Improving Participation in Cultural Practices.” In Childhood Studies and the Impact of Globalization: Policies and Practices at Global and Local Levels, edited by M. Fleer, M. Hedegaard and J. Tudge, 213–229. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oers, B., W. Wardekker, E. Elbers, and R. Van der Veer, eds. 2008. The Transformation of Learning. Advances in Cultural-historical Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rijk, Y., M. Volman, D. De Haan, and B. Van Oers. Forthcoming. Maximizing Meaning: Creating a Learning Environment for Reading Comprehension of Informative Texts from a Vygotskian Perspective.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, L. 1995. Handleiding Drie-Minuten-Toets [ Guide fot the Three-minutes-test]. Arnhem: Cito.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, L., and A. Vermeer. 1995. Handleiding Leeswoordenschat [ Guide for Reading Vocabulary]. Arnhem: Cito.
   Google Scholar
• Wardekker, W. 2012. “Responsible Teaching.” In Developmental Education for Young Children, edited by B. van Oers, 27–39. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-4617-6
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (2000). “Dialogic Inquiry in Education. Building on the Legacy of Vygotsky”. In Vygotskian Perspectives on Literacy Research, edited by C. D. Lee and P. Smagorinsky, 51–85. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G., and G. Claxton, eds. 2002. Learning for Life in the 21st Century. Sociocultural Perspectives on the Future of Education, 84–96. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• West, B. T., K. B. Welch, and A. T. Galecki. 2007. Linear Mixed Models: A Practical Guide Using Statistical Software. New York, NY: Chapman Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., J. T. Guthrie, K. C. Perencevich, A. Taboada, S. L. Klauda, A. McRae, and P. Barbosa. 2008. “Role of Reading Engagement in Mediating Effects of Reading Comprehension Instruction on Reading Outcomes.” Psychology in the Schools 45 (5): 432–445.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. 2002. “Becoming a Self-regulated Learner: An Overview.” Theory Into Practice 41 (2): 64–70. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar