How teachers’ practices and students’ attitudes towards technology affect mathematics achievement: results and insights from PISA 2012

References

• Biagi, F., and M. Loi. 2013. “Measuring ICT Use and Learning Outcomes: Evidence from Recent Econometric Studies.” European Journal of Education 48: 28–42. doi:10.1111/ejed.12016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bietenbeck, J. 2014. “Teaching Practice and Cognitive Skills.” Labour Economics 30: 143–153.10.1016/j.labeco.2014.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro, M., E. Expósito-Casas, E. López-Martín, L. Lizasoain, E. Navarro, and J. L. Gaviria. 2015. “Parental Involvement on Student Academic Achievement: A Meta-analysis.” Educational Research Review 14: 33–46. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., J. N. Friedman, and J. Rockoff. 2014. “Measuring the Impact of Teachers I: Evaluating, and Perseverance: Critical Factors for Success in Teacher Value-added Estimates.” American Economic Review 104 (9): 2593–2632. doi:10.1257/aer.104.9.2593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayson, D. E. 2008. “Student Evaluations of Teaching: Are They Related to What Student Learn? A Meta-analysis and Review of the Literature.” Journal of Marketing Education 31 (1): 16–30.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, J. M., and J. A. C. Hattie. 2015. “Teachers as Evaluators: An Empowerment Evaluation Approach.” In Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tool for Self-Assessment, Evaluation Capacity Building, and Accountability, edited by D. Fetterman, S. Kaftarian, and A. Wandersman, 86–111. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. New York: Routledge Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Delen, E., and O. Bulut. 2011. “The Relationship between Students’ Exposure to Technology and Their Achievement in Science and Math.” Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET) 10: 311–317.
   Google Scholar
• Echazarra, A., D. Salinas, I. Méndez, V. Denis, and G. Rech. 2016. “How Teachers Teach and Students Learn: Successful Strategies for School.” OECD Education Working Papers, 130. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/19939019.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, P. W., D. W. Leonard, and W. W. Beatty. 1975. “Student Ratings of Instruction: Validation Research.” American Educational Research Journal 12: 435–444.10.3102/00028312012004435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaviria, J. L., and M. Castro. 2005. Los modelos jerárquicos lineales [Hierarchical Linear Models]. Madrid: La Muralla.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2012. Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2015. “The Applicability of Visible Learning to Higher Education.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 1: 79–91. doi:10.1037/stl0000021.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77: 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, V. E. 2003. Grade Inflation: A Crisis in College Education. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., and D. B. Wilson. 2001. Practical Meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McKeachie, W. J. 1987. “Can evaluating instruction improve teaching?” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 1987: 3–7. doi:10.1002/tl.37219873103.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2009. PISA 2006 Technical Report. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/42025182.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2010. Mathematics Teaching and Learning in PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264039520-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264190511-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. PISA Technical Report 2012. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/PISA-2012-technical-report-final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rodin, M., and B. Rodin. 1972. “Student evaluations of teachers.” Science 177: 1164–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T., and R. Bosker. 2009. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A. M., and G. R. Skanes. 1974. “Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching and the Characteristics of Successful Instructors.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 584–590.10.1037/h0036929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, S., and L. De Bortoli. 2007. PISA 2003 Australia: ICT Use Familiarity at School and Home. Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) Research Monograph, 62. https://www.acer.edu.au/files/Mono_62_PISA-ICT_Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, B. A., B. M. Fleisher, and M. Hashimoto. 2007. Evaluating Methods for Evaluating Instruction: The Case of Higher Education. (NBER Working Paper No. 12844). http://www.nber.org/papers/w12844.10.3386/w12844
   Google Scholar
• Willms, J. D. 2010. “School Composition and Contextual Effects on Student Outcomes.” Teachers College Record 112: 1008–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar