Learners’ attitudes to mixed-attainment grouping: examining the views of students of high, middle and low attainment

References

• Abraham, J. 1995. Divide and School: Gender and Class Dynamics in Comprehensive Education. London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abraham, John. 2008. “Pupils’ Perceptions of Setting and Beyond – A Response to Hallam and Ireson.” British Educational Research Journal 34 (6): 855–863. doi:10.1080/01411920802044511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams-Byers, Jan, Sara Squiller Whitsell, and Sidney M. Moon. 2004. “Gifted Students’ Perceptions of the Academic and Social/Emotional Effects of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Grouping.” Gifted Child Quarterly 48 (1): 7–20. doi:10.1177/001698620404800102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L. 2003. Race, Masculinity and Schooling: Muslim Boys and Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, L., B. Francis, S. Miller, B. Taylor, A. Tereshchenko, A. Mazenod, D. Pepper, and M.-C. Travers. 2018. “The Symbolic Violence of Setting: A Bourdieusian Analysis of Mixed Methods Data on Secondary Students’ Views about Setting.” British Educational Research Journal 44 (1): 119–140. doi:10.1002/berj.3321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 1981. “The Teaching Nexus: A Case of Mixed Abilty.” In Schools, Teachers and Teaching, edited by Len Barton and Stephen Walker, 159–175. Basingstoke: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Howard, Blanche Geer, and E. Hughes. 1968. Making the Grade. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bixby, Janet. 2006. “Authority in Detracked High School Classrooms: Tensions among Individualism, Equity, and Legitimacy.” In Classroom Authority: Theory, Research, and Practice, edited by Judith L. Pace and Annette Hemmings, 113–134. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, Jo. 1997. “When Even the Winners Are Losers: Evaluating the Experiences of Top Set’ Students.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 29 (2): 165–182. doi:10.1080/002202797184116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, Jo. 2006. “How a Detracked Mathematics Approach Promoted Respect, Responsibility, and High Achievement.” Theory into Practice 45 (1): 40–46. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4501_6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, Jo. 2008. “Promoting ‘Relational Equity’ and High Mathematics Achievement through an Innovative Mixed-Ability Approach.” British Educational Research Journal 34 (2): 167–194.10.1080/01411920701532145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, Jo, Dylan Wiliam, and Margaret Brown. 2000. “Students' Experiences of Ability Grouping – Disaffection, Polarisation and the Construction of Failure.” British Educational Research Journal 26 (5): 631–648.10.1080/713651583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burris, Carol Corbett, Edd Willey, Kevin Welner, and John Murphy. 2008. “Accountability, Rigor, and Detracking: Achievement Effects of Embracing a Challenging Curriculum as a Universal Good for All Students.” Teachers College Record 110 (3): 571–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmielewski, Anna K. 2014. “An International Comparison of Achievement Inequality in within- and between-School Tracking Systems.” American Journal of Education 120 (3): 293–324. doi:10.1086/675529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbishley, P., J. Evans, C. Kenrick, and B. Davies. 1981. “Teacher Strategies and Pupil Identities in Mixed Ability Curricula: A Note on Concepts and Some Examples from Maths.” In Schools, Teachers and Teaching, edited by Len Barton and Stephen Walker, 177–195. Basingstoke: The Farmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Domina, T., P. Hanselman, N. Hwang, and A. McEachin. 2016. “Detracking and Tracking up.” American Educational Research Journal 53 (4): 1229–1266.10.3102/0002831216650405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dracup, T. 2014. “The Politics of Setting.” https://giftedphoenix.wordpress.com/2014/11/12/the-politics-of-setting/.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, B. 2000. Boys, Girls and Achievement: Addressing the Classroom Issues. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, Becky, Louise Archer, Jeremy Hodgen, David Pepper, Becky Taylor, and Mary-Claire Travers. 2017. “Exploring the Relative Lack of Impact of Research on ‘Ability Grouping’ in England: A Discourse Analytic Account.” Cambridge Journal of Education 47 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2015.1093095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garmoran, Adam. 2009. “Tracking and Inequality: New Directions for Research and Practice.” In The Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Education, edited by Michael W. Apple, Stephen J. Ball, and Luis Armando Gandin, 213-228 Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gillborn, David, and Deborah Youdell. 2000. Rationing Education: Policy, Practice, Reform, and Equity. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallam, Susan, and Judith Ireson. 2005. “Secondary School Teachers’ Pedagogic Practices When Teaching Mixed and Structured Ability Classes.” Research Papers in Education 20 (1): 3–24.10.1080/0267152052000341318
   Google Scholar
• Hallam, Susan, and Judith Ireson. 2006. “Secondary School Pupils’ Preferences for Different Types of Structured Grouping Practices.” British Educational Research Journal 32 (4): 583–599.10.1080/01411920600775274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallam, Susan, and Judith Ireson. 2007. “Secondary School Pupils’ Satisfaction with Their Ability Grouping Placements.” British Educational Research Journal 33 (1): 27–45.10.1080/01411920601104342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, Lorna. 2002. “Constructing Pupil Identity: Personhood and Ability.” British Educational Research Journal 28 (4): 591–602. doi:10.1080/0141192022000005841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, Susan. 1992. “Differentiation. Part of the Problem or Part of the Solution?” The Curriculum Journal 3 (2): 131–142. doi:10.1080/0958517920030203.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, Susan, et al. 2004. Learning without Limits. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, S., M. Katsipataki, R. Coleman, P. Henderson, L. Major, R. Coe, and D. Mason. 2015. The Sutton Trust – Education Endowment Foundation Teaching and Learning Toolkit. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgen, J., B. Taylor, B. Francis, L. Archer, A. Mazenod, A. Tereshchenko. forthcoming. “Resisting Homogeneous ‘Ability’ Grouping Practices: How Some Schools Buck the Trend and Implement Mixed Attainment Teaching”.
   Google Scholar
• Ireson, Judith, and Susan Hallam. 2001. Ability Grouping in Education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kerckhoff, Alan C. 1986. “Effects of Ability Grouping in British Secondary Schools.” American Sociological Review 51 (6): 842–858. doi:10.2307/2095371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, Chen-Lin C., and James A. Kulik. 1982. “Effects of Ability Grouping on Secondary School Students: A Meta-Analysis of Evaluation Findings.” American Educational Research Journal 19 (3): 415–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutnick, P., J. Sebba, P. Blatchford, M. Galton, J. Thorp, H. MacIntyre, and L. Berdondini. 2005. The Effects of Pupil Grouping: Literature Review. London: DCSF.
   Google Scholar
• Kutscher, Bilha, and Liora Linchevski. 2000. “Moving between Mixed-Ability and Same-Ability Settings: Impact on Learners.” 24th Conference of the International. Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Hiroshima, Japan, July 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Loveless, T. 2009. Tracking and Detracking: High Achievers in Massachusetts Middle Schools. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, Rachel. 2016. Ability-Grouping in Primary Schools: Case Studies and Critical Debates. Northwich: Critical Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, Herbert W. 1984. “Self-Concept, Social Comparison, and Ability Grouping: A Reply to Kulik and Kulik.” American Educational Research Journal 21 (4): 799–806.10.3102/00028312021004799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazenod, Anna, Becky Francis, Louise Archer, Jeremy Hodgen, Becky Taylor, Antonina Tereshchenko, and David Pepper. 2018. “Nurturing Learning or Curtailing Independence? Teacher Constructions of Students in Lower Attainment Groups in English Secondary Schools.” Cambridge Journal of Education. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2018.1441372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modica, M. 2015. “‘My Skin Color Stops Me from Leading’: Tracking, Identity, and Student Dynamics in a Racially Mixed School.” International Journal of Multicultural Education 17 (3): 76–90.10.18251/ijme.v17i3.1030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, Jenny, Amy Stuart Wells, Makeba Jones, and Amanda Datnow. 1997. “Detracking: The Social Construction of Ability, Cultural Politics, and Resistance to Reform.” Teachers College Record 98 (3): 482–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. PISA 2012 Results: What Makes Schools Successful? Resources, Policies and Practices (Volume IV). PISA: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OFSTED. 2015. “The Most Able Students: An Update on Progress since June 2013.” Manchester. www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted.
   Google Scholar
• Punch, Samantha. 2002. “Research with Children: The Same or Different from Research with Adults?” Childhood 9 (3): 321–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, Diane, and Dylan Wiliam. 1999. “‘I’ll Be a Nothing’: Structure, Agency and the Construction of Identity through Assessment.” British Educational Research Journal 25 (3): 343–354. doi:10.1080/0141192990250305.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, Diane, Gill Crozier, and David James. 2011. White Middle-Class Identities and Urban Schooling. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230302501
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Jenny. 2016. “The ‘More Capable Peer’: Approaches to Collaborative Learning in a Mixed-Ability Classroom.” Changing English 23 (1): 42–51. doi:10.1080/1358684X.2015.1133765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, James E. 1999. “If Tracking is Bad, is Detracking Better?” American Educator 47 (4): 24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, B. 2008. “Detracking in Context: How Local Constructions of Ability Complicate Equity-Geared Reform.” Teachers College Record 110 (3): 647–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, Beth C. 2003. “Unpacking Detracking: When Progressive Pedagogy Meets Students’ Social Worlds.” American Educational Research Journal 40 (2): 539–573. doi:10.3102/00028312040002539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, Lexie. 2016. “‘I am Not Clever, They Are Cleverer than Us’: Children Reading in the Primary School.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 37 (3): 389–407. doi:10.1080/01425692.2014.948989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, Carolyn M. 2002. “A Comparison Study of Student Attitudes and Perceptions in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Classrooms.” Roeper Review 24 (3): 115–119. doi:10.1080/02783190209554146.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, Robert E. 1990. “Achievement Effects of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis.” Review of Educational Research 60: 471–499. doi:10.3102/00346543060003471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, Robert E. 1996. “Research on Cooperative Learning and Achievement: What We Know, What We Need to Know.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 21 (1): 43–69.10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen-Hu, S., M. Makel, P. Olszewski-Kubilius. 2016. “What One Hundred Years of Research Says About the Effects of Ability Grouping and Acceleration on K–12 Students’ Academic Achievement.” Review of Educational Research 86 (4): 849–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Becky, Mary-Claire Travers, Becky Francis, Jeremy Hodgen, and Claudia Sumner. 2015. Best Practice in Mixed-Attainment Grouping. London: Education Endowment Foundation/King’s College London.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Becky, Becky Francis, Louise Archer, Jeremy Hodgen, David Pepper, Antonina Tereshchenko, and Mary-Claire Travers. 2017. “Factors Deterring Schools from Mixed Attainment Teaching Practice.” Pedagogy, Culture and Society 25 (3): 327–345. doi:10.1080/14681366.2016.1256908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatakrishnan, Hamsa, and Dylan Wiliam. 2003. “Tracking and Mixed-Ability Grouping in Secondary School Mathematics Classrooms: A Case Study 1.” British Educational Research Journal 29 (2): 189–204. doi:10.1080/0141192032000060939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls, Fiona. 2009. Mathematical Subjects: Children Talk about Their Mathematics Lives. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-0597-0
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. 1999. “How Useful Are Focus Groups in Feminist Research?” In Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice, edited by S. Barbour Rosaline and J. Kitzinger. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yonezawa, Susan, and Makeba Jones. 2006. “Students Perspectives on Tracking and Detracking.” Theory into Practice 45 (1): 15–23. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4501_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonezawa, Susan, Amy Stuart Wells, and Irene Serna. 2002. “Choosing Tracks: ‘Freedom of Choice’ in Detracking Schools.” American Educational Research Journal 39 (1): 37–67. doi:10.3102/00028312039001037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youdell, Deborah. 2006. Impossible Bodies, Impossible Selves: Exclusion and Student Subjectivities. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar