Upper secondary school students’ perspectives on un/fairness in group work assessment

References

• AERA, APA, and NCME. 2014. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. 2017. Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Baines, E., P. Blatchford, and P. Kutnick. 2016. “Promoting Effective Group Work Int Theprimary Classroom.” In A Handbook for Teachers and Practioners, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315730363.
   Google Scholar
• Bala Gaur, S., and T. Gupta. 2013. “Is Group Assessment a Bane or Boon in Higher Education? A Students–Teacher Perspective.” International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education 6 (3): 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2013.795610.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, N., & S. E. Naumann. 2005. “Withholding Effort at Work: Understanding Andpreventing Shirking, Job Neglect, Social Loafing, and Free Riding.” In Managing Organizational Deviance, edited by R. E. Kidwell & C. L. Martin, 113–130. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & V. Clarke. 2021. “To Saturate or Not to Saturate? Questioning Data Saturation As a Useful Concept for Thematic Analysis and Sample-size Rationales.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise & Health 13 (2): 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2022. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S., and S. Kvale. 2014. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. 2013. Grading and Group Work. Washington, DC: ASCD Arias.
   Google Scholar
• Caple, H., and M. Bogle. 2013. “Making Group Assessment Transparent: What Wikis Can Contribute to Collaborative Projects.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (2): 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.618879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chory-Assad, R. M. 2002. “Classroom Justice: Perceptions of Fairness As a Predictor of Student Motivation, Learning, and Aggression.” Communication Quarterly 50 (1): 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370209385646.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. 1949. “An Experimental Study of the Effects of Co-Operation and Competition Upon Group Process.” Human Relations 2 (3): 199–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674900200301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doran, K. M., K. T. Ragins, C. P. Gross, and S. Zerger. 2013. “Medical Respite Programs for Homeless Patients: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 24 (2): 499–524. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2013.0053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsell, J., K. Forslund Frykedal, and E. Hammar Chiriac. 2020. “Group Work Assessment: Assessing Social Skills at Group Level.” Small Group Research 51 (1): 87–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496419878269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsell, J., K. Forslund Frykedal, E. Hammar Chiriac, and S. K. F. Hui. 2021. “Teachers’ Perceived Challenges in Group Work Assessment.” Cogent Education 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1886474.
   Google Scholar
• Forslund Frykedal, K., and E. Hammar Chiriac. 2011. “Assessment of Students’ Learning When Working in Groups.” Educational Research 53 (3): 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2011.598661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forslund Frykedal, K., and E. Hammar Chiriac. 2017. “To Make the Unknown Known: Assessment in Group Work Among Students.” Journal of Education Research 10 (2): 149–162.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, J., and A. Fontana. 1991. “The Group Interview in Social Research.” The Social Science Journal 28 (2): 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-3319(91)90003-M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedamu, A. D., and G. L. Shewangezaw. 2019. “Selected Secondary School students’ Perspective of their Teachers’Group Work Assessment Practices.” Ethiopian Journal of Business and Social Science 2 (2): 38–56. https://doi.org/10.59122/73402tY.
   Google Scholar
• Gedamu, A. D., and G. L. Shewangezaw. 2020. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices of Cooperative Group Work Assessment: Selected Secondary School Teachers in Focus.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 45 (11): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.202v45n11.1.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. 2016. “Cooperative Learning. Review of Research and Practice.” Australian Journal of Educationa L Research 41 (3): 39–54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3.
   Google Scholar
• Hammar Chiriac, E., and K. Forslund Frykedal. 2023. “Individual Group Work Assessment in Cooperative Learning: Possibilities and Challenges.” In Contemporary Global Perspectives on Cooperative Learning Applications Across Educational Contexts, edited by R. Gillies, N. A. Davidson, and B. Mills, 94–108. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hammar Chiriac, E., and K. Granström. 2012. “Teachers’ Leadership and students’ Experience of Group Work.” Teachers & Teaching 18 (3): 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2012.629842.
   Google Scholar
• Hassanien, A. 2006. “Student Experience of Group Work and Group Assessment in Higher Education.” Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism 6 (1): 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1300/J172v06n01_02.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M., and G. Vaughan. 2018. Social psychology. 8th ed. New York: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Holmgren, J. L., and S. Bolkan. 2014. “Instructor Responses to Rhetorical Dissent: Student Perceptions of Justice and Classroom Outcomes.” Communication Education 63 (1): 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2013.833644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, X. 2012. “A Comparative Study of Effectiveness of Peer Assessment of individuals’ Contributions to Group Projects in Undergraduate Construction Management Core Units.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (5): 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.557147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., and R. T. Johnson. 2004. Assessing Students in Groups. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M., and M. Burns. 2013. “The Argument-Based Approach to Validation.” School Psychology Review 42 (4): 448–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karau, S. J., and J. W. Hart. 1998. “Group Cohesiveness and Social Loafing: Effects of a Social Interaction Manipulation on Individual Motivation within Groups.” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research & Practice 2 (3): 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.2.3.185.
   Google Scholar
• Karau, S. J., and A. J. Wilhau. 2020. “Social Loafing and Motivation Gains in Groups: An Integrative Review.” In Individual Motivation within Groups: Social Loafing and Motivation Gains in Work, Academic, and Sports Teams, edited by S. J. Karau, 3–51. Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-849867-5.00001-X.
   Google Scholar
• Karau, S. J., and K. D. Williams. 1993. “Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration.” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 65 (4): 681–706. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidwell, R. E., and N. Bennett. 1993. “Employee Propensity to Withhold Effort: A Conceptual Model to Intersect Three Avenues of Research.” Academy of Management Review 18 (3): 429–456. https://doi.org/10.2307/258904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, A. 2019. Bedömning, betyg och lärande. [Assessment, grades and learning]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Kravitz, D. A., and B. Martin. 1986. “Ringelmann Rediscovered: The Original Article.” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 50 (5): 936–941. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotan, R. A. 2003. “Group-Worthy Tasks.” Educational Leadership 60 (6): 72–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H. 2018. Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective Standard-Based Instruction. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, H., R. Hoekstra, J. Brouwer, and J. Strijbos. 2020. “Unfolding Collaborative Learning Assessment Literacy: A Reflection on Current Assessment Methods in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (8): 1222–1240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1729696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. 1989. “Validity.” In Educational Measurement, edited by R. L. Linn, 13–104. 3rd ed. New York: American Council on education and Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, S. 2010. “Collaborating or Fighting for the Marks? Students’ Experiences of Group Work Assessment in the Creative Arts.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003632357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon, J. K. L. 2011. “Students’ Perceptions of Peer Evaluation in Project Work.” ACE’11: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Australasian Computing Education Conference. CR-PIT, vol. 114, 87–94. Perth, Australia: Australian Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Rasooli, A., H. Zandi, and C. DeLuca. 2019. “Conceptualising Fairness in Classroom Assessment: Exploring the Value of Organizational Justice Theory.” Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice 26 (5): 584–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1593105.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A., C. Rolheiser, and A. Hogaboam‐Gray. 1998. “Student Evaluation in Co‐Operative learning: Teacher Cognitions.” Teachers & Teaching 4 (2): 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354060980040207.
   Google Scholar
• Selghed, B. 2004. Ännu icke godkänt: Lärares sätt att erfara betygsystemet och dess tillämpning i yrkesutövningen. [Not Yet Passed: Teachers’ Way of Experiencing the Grading System and Its Application in Professional Practice] Malmö: Malmö Högskola.
   Google Scholar
• Shiu, A. T., C. W. Chan, P. Lam, J. Lee, and A. N. Kwong. 2012. “Baccalaureate Nursing students’ Perceptions of Peer Assessment of Individual Contributions to a Group Project: A Case Study.” Nurse Education Today 32 (3): 214–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.03.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2011. Läroplan för gymnasieskolan 2011, examensmål och gymnasiegemensamma ämnen. [Curriculum, Degree Objectives and Upper Secondary School Subjects 2011] Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., and N. A. Madden. 2021. “Student Team Learning and Sucess for All: A Personal History and Overview.” In Pioneering Perspectives in Cooperative Learning, edited by N. Davidson, 128–145. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., and J. Rogers. 2014. “Understanding Nursing students’ Perspectives on the Grading of Group Work Assessments.” Nurse Education in Practice 14 (2): 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2013.07.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J. W. 2011. “Assessment of (Computer-Supported) Collaborative Learning.” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 4 (1): 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2010.37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J. W. 2016. “Assessment of Collaborative Learning.” In Handbook of Social and Human Conditions in Assessment, edited by G. T. L. Brown and L. Harris. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, R. D. 2013. “Fairness in Classroom Assessment.” In SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment, edited by J. H. McMillan, 125–144. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., J. Shay Schumm, and J. Sinagub. 1996. Focus Group Interviews in Education and Psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet.2017. God forskningssed. Vetenskapsrådet. [ Good research practice].
   Google Scholar
• Waldow, F. 2014. “Conceptions of Justice in the Examination Systems of England, Germany, and Sweden: A Look at Safeguards of Fair Procedure and Possibilities of Appeal.” Comparative Education Review 58 (2): 322–343. https://doi.org/10.1086/674781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. 1997. “Assessing Students in Small Collaborative Groups.” Theory into Practice 36 (4): 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849709543770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikström, C. 2009. “National Curriculum Assessment in England: A Swedish Perspective.” Educational Research 51 (2): 255–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880902891925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar