‘It’s an illusion, but it looks real!’ Consumer affective, cognitive and behavioural responses to augmented reality applications

References

• Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694. doi:10.2307/3250951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(6), 34–47. doi:10.1109/38.963459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billinghurst, M., & Kato, H. (2002). Collaborative augmented reality. Communications of the ACM, 45(7), 64–70. doi:10.1145/514236.514265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blascovich, J., & Bailenson, J. (2011). Infinite reality: Avatars, eternal life, new worlds, and the dawn of the virtual revolution. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brignull, H., & Rogers, Y. (2003). Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. In Proceedings of INTERACT (pp. 17–24). IOS Press. doi:10.1.1.129.603
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, J., & Oliver, M. B. (Eds.). (2009). Media effects: Advances in theory and research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K., & Chidambaram, L. (1999). How much bandwidth is enough? A longitudinal examination of media characteristics and group outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 23(4), 557–579. doi:10.2307/249489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought-listing technique. In T. V. Merluzzi, C. R. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.), Cognitive assessment (pp. 309–342). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmigniani, J., & Furht, B. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview. In B. Furht (Ed.), Handbook of augmented reality (pp. 3–46). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carmigniani, J., Furht, B., Anisetti, M., Ceravolo, P., Damiani, E., & Ivkovic, M. (2011). Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 51, 341–377. doi:10.1007/s11042-010-0660-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, H., & Schwarz, N. (2012). I like your product when i like my photo: Misattribution using interactive virtual mirrors. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 235–243. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2012.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, J. R., & Thorson, E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 65–77. doi:10.1080/00913367.2001.10673646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cyr, D., Head, M., & Ivanov, A. (2009). Perceived interactivity leading to e-loyalty: Development of a model for cognitive–affective user responses. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(10), 850–869. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daugherty, T., Li, H., & Biocca, F. (2008). Consumer learning and the effects of virtual experience relative to indirect and direct product experience. Psychology & Marketing, 25(7), 568–586. doi:10.1002/mar.20225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, G. S. (1998). Organizing for interactivity. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 12(1), 47–53. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6653(199824)12:1<47::AID-DIR5>3.0.CO;2-B
   Google Scholar
• Deighton, J., & Kornfeld, L. (2009). Interactivity’s unanticipated consequences for marketers and marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(1), 4–10. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2008.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, C., Brakus, J., & Alamanos, E. (2013). The wallpaper matters: Digital signage as customer-experience provider at the Harrods (London, UK) department store. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(3–4), 338–355. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2013.766628
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, C., Merrilees, B., Jayawardhena, C., & Wright, L. T. (2009). E-consumer behaviour. European Journal of Marketing, 43(9/10), 1121–1139. doi:10.1108/03090560910976393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dix, A. (2009). Human-computer interaction. In L. Liu, & M. T. Ozsu (Eds.), Encyclopedia of database systems (pp. 1327–1331). New York, NY: Springer US. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_192
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P. (2003). A “Mix of Attributes” approach to the study of media effects and new communication technologies. Journal of Communication, 53(3), 395–410. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02598.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faiola, A., Newlon, C., Pfaff, M., & Smyslova, O. (2013). Correlating the effects of flow and telepresence in virtual worlds: Enhancing our understanding of user behavior in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1113–1121. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fei, Y., Kryze, D., & Melle, A. (2012). Tavola: Holographic user experience. In ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference, SIGGRAPH’12, Los Angeles, CA. doi:10.1145/2343456.2343477.
   Google Scholar
• Fiore, A. M., Kim, J., & Lee, H.-H. (2005). Effect of image interactivity technology on consumer responses toward the online retailer. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(3), 38–53. doi:10.1002/dir.20042
   Google Scholar
• FitzGerald, E., Ferguson, R., Adams, A., Gaved, M., Mor, Y., & Thomas, R. (2013). Augmented reality and mobile learning: The state of the art. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 5(4), 43–58. doi:10.4018/IJMBL
   Google Scholar
• Forsythe, S., Liu, C., Shannon, D., & Gardner, L. C. (2006). Development of a scale to measure the perceived benefits and risks of online shopping. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 20(2), 55–75. doi:10.1002/dir.20061
   Google Scholar
• Fortin, D. R., & Dholakia, R. R. (2005). Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 387–396. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00106-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabisch, J. (2011). Virtual world brand experience and its impact on real world purchasing behavior. Journal of Brand Management, 19(1), 18–32. doi:10.1057/bm.2011.29
   Google Scholar
• Gao, Q., Rau, P.-L. P., & Salvendy, G. (2009). Perception of interactivity: Affects of four key variables in mobile advertising. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25(6), 479–505. doi:10.1080/10447310902963936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartson, R. (2003). Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(5), 315–338. doi:10.1080/01449290310001592587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50. doi:10.2307/1251841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2009). Flow online: Lessons learned and future prospects. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(1), 23–34. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2008.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132–140. doi:10.1086/jcr.1982.9.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, E. (2012). Online experiences and virtual goods purchase intention. Internet Research, 22(3), 252–274. doi:10.1108/10662241211235644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, T.-L., & Hsu Liu, F. (2014). Formation of augmented-reality interactive technology’s persuasive effects from the perspective of experiential value. Internet Research, 24(1), 82–109. doi:10.1108/IntR-07-2012-0133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, T.-L., & Liao, S. (2015). A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology: The moderating role of cognitive innovativeness. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 269–295. doi:10.1007/s10660-014-9163-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javornik, A. (2014). Classifications of augmented reality uses in marketing. In IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented realities 2014. Munich: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ISMAR-AMH.2014.6935441.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, S. A., & Bolebruch, J. (2009). Avatar-based advertising in Second life: The role of presence and attractiveness of virtual spokespersons. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10(1), 51–60. doi:10.1080/15252019.2009.10722162
   Google Scholar
• Jin, S.-A.-A. (2009). The roles of modality richness and involvement in shopping behavior in 3D virtual stores. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(3), 234–246. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2009.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Forsythe, S. (2008a). Adoption of virtual try-on technology for online apparel shopping. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22(2), 45–59. doi:10.1002/dir.20113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Forsythe, S. (2008b). Sensory enabling technology acceptance model (SE-TAM): A multiple-group structural model comparison. Psychology & Marketing, 25(9), 901–922. doi:10.1002/mar20245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media & Society, 4(3), 355–383. doi:10.1177/146144480200400303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 205–223. doi:10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. C., & Chung, N. (2008). Empirical analysis of consumer reaction to the virtual reality shopping mall. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(1), 88–104. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Daugherty, T., & Biocca, F. (2002). Impact of 3-D advertising on product knowledge, brand attitude, and purchase intention: The mediating role of presence. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 43–57. doi:10.1080/00913367.2002.10673675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T., & Meshkova, Z. (2013). Examining the impact of rich media on consumer willingness to pay in online stores. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(6), 449–461. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. J. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 53–64. doi:10.1080/00913367.2002.10673685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, P., Morris, R., Rogers, Y., Kreitmayer, S., Davies, M., & Keynes, M. (2011). Rethinking ’Multi-user ’: An in-the-wild study of how groups approach a walk-up-and-use tabletop interface. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM (pp. 3033–3042). Vancouver, BC: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mathwick, C., & Rigdon, E. (2004). Play, flow, and the online search experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 324–332. doi:10.1086/422111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J.-S. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity: An exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 29–42. doi:10.1080/00913367.2002.10673674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321–1329.
   Google Scholar
• Mollen, A., & Wilson, H. (2010). Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: Reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 63(9–10), 919–925. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, J., & Kim, Y. (2001). Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Information & Management, 38, 217–230. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nah, F. F., Eschenbrenner, B., & Dewester, D. (2011). Enhancing brand equity through flow and telepresence: A comparison of 2D and 3D virtual. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nel, D., Van Niekerk, R., Berthon, J.-P., & Davies, T. (1999). Going with the flow: Web sites and customer involvement. Internet Research, 9(2), 109–116. doi:10.1108/10662249910264873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43. doi:10.1145/301153.301168
   Google Scholar
• Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Duhachek, A. (2003). The influence of goal-directed and experiential activities on online flow experiences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1–2), 3–16. doi:10.1207/S15327663JCP13-1&2_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papagiannidis, S., Pantano, E., See-To, E. W., & Bourlakis, M. (2013). Modelling the determinants of a simulated experience in a virtual retail store and users’ product purchasing intentions. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(13–14), 1462–1492. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2013.821150
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., Stoel, L., & Lennon, S. J. (2008). Cognitive, affective and conative responses to visual simulation: The effects of rotation in online product presentation. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7(1), 72–87. doi:10.1002/cb.237
   Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preece, J., Sharp, H., & Rogers, Y. (2015). Interaction design - beyond human-computer interaction. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. Sage Annual Review of Communication Research: Advancing Communication Science, 16, 110–134.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y. (2012). HCI theory: Classical, modern, and contemporary. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, 5(2), 1–129. doi:10.2200/S00418ED1V01Y201205HCI014
   Google Scholar
• Saren, M., Harwood, T., Ward, J., & Venkatesh, A. (2013). Marketing beyond the frontier? Researching the new marketing landscape of virtual worlds. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(13–14), 1435–1442. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2013.833776
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, B. (1999). Experiential marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(1–3), 53–67. doi:10.1362/026725799784870496
   Google Scholar
• Song, J. H., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2008). Determinants of perceived web site interactivity. Journal of Marketing, 72(2), 99–113. doi:10.1509/jmkg.72.2.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality : Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73–93. doi:10.1111/jcom.1992.42.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. W., & Pavlou, P. A. (2009). The effects of media on marketing communications. In J. Bryant, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 362–401). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2004). Theorizing interactivity’s effects. The Information Society, 20(5), 385–389. doi:10.1080/01972240490508072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Jia, H., Waddell, T. F., & Huang, Y. (2015). Toward a theory of interactive media effects (TIME). In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 47–86). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Xu, Q., & Dou, X. (2012). Role of technology in online persuasion. A MAIN model perspective. In S. Rodgers, & E. Thorson (Eds.), Advertising theory (pp. 355–372). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Krevelen, D. W. F., & Poelman, R. (2010). A survey of augmented reality technologies, applications and limitations. The International Journal of Virtual Reality, 9(2), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Van Noort, G., Voorveld, H. A. M., & van Reijmersdal, E. A. (2012). Interactivity in brand web sites: cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses explained by consumers’ online flow experience. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 223–234. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2011.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorveld, H. A., Neijens, P. C., & Smit, E. G. (2011). The relation between actual and perceived interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 40(2), 77–92. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367400206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorveld, H. A. M., Neijens, P. C., & Smit, E. G. (2009). Consumers’ responses to brand websites: An interdisciplinary review. Internet Research, 19(5), 535–565. doi:10.1108/10662240910998887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J., Trevino, L. K., & Ryan, L. (1993). The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 9(4), 411–426. doi:10.1016/0747-5632(93)90032-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2014). Marketing in computer-mediated environments: research synthesis and new directions. Journal of Marketing, 78, 20–40. doi:10.1509/jm.12.0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakhlef, A. (2015). Customer experience within retail environments: An embodied, spatial approach. Marketing Theory, 15, 545–564. doi:10.1177/1470593115569016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar